Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 6:43 pm



Reply to topic  [ 148 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
 Friday Numbers - UPDATED with BOM Numbers 
Author Message
Site Owner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
Post 
See box,

I absolutly love the music, have bought the CD, love that too. I don't get why so many people hate it the way they do.

KJ


Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:19 am
Profile WWW
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:47 pm
Posts: 3917
Location: Las Vegas
Post 
Box, to make a long story short, you are saying Phantom of the Upma sucks bad and should be avoided like the diarrea. This is based on experience and not necessarily watching the movie :rofl:

But I agree with your theory. People do it all the time.

Joel Schumacher, didn't he almost kill the Batman franchise? That is another important criteria in choosing to watch a movie.

_________________
Dr. RajKumar 4/24/1929 - 4/12/2006
The Greatest Actor Ever.
Thanks for The Best Cinematic Memories of My Life.


Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:22 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
If you predeterming the fact that you will like it, then why bothering to see it?.



Well, most of the time I just watch a film for the heck of it, but seeing how I don't generally go to the movies a lot to begin with, I want to make informed choices.


But mistakes happen; I mean, I fully expected Shrek 2 to be a very good film, and it was horrendous.


Heh, to each their own. I just wanted to make it clear that I have my reasons for liking or disliking a film, and that it is often possible to determine that without having watched it entirely. I mean, everything I've been told about TPOTO is pointing towards a truly agonizing viewing experience.


Oh, and I liked Beauty and the Beast a lot, just to clarify that I do not dislike those types of films by virtue of their genre.

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:26 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
jb007 wrote:
Box, to make a long story short, you are saying Phantom of the Upma sucks bad and should be avoided like the diarrea. This is based on experience and not necessarily watching the movie :rofl:



You're making something necessarily complicated unnecessarily simple

Image


One interesting thing that one of my profs said: his collegeaus who are in the film department and film experts, have a hard time staying awake during most films that they watch because they know what is going to happen next. I think some of the critics are pretty much in that same situation; I'm positive that's one of the major reasons behind the cruel treatment films like TDAT receive.

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:31 am
Profile WWW
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:47 pm
Posts: 3917
Location: Las Vegas
Post 
Box, for eg. lot of people saw the trailers of let's say a Catwoman and decided not to watch that movie.

With TDAT the same did not apply. Even though it was very predictable it was a summer popcorn movie and a lot people liked it.

The Phantom of the Umbrella is another issue.

Lot of people have seen the play and that is not necessarily good for the movie.
Joel Schumacher :P
A musical with nobodies. Chicago had lot of good stars.
Horrible reviews. For platform release you need good reviews.

It was a very easy decision for the majority to avoid this.

_________________
Dr. RajKumar 4/24/1929 - 4/12/2006
The Greatest Actor Ever.
Thanks for The Best Cinematic Memories of My Life.


Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:41 am
Profile WWW
Christian's #1 Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
Post 
Guess I was the only one who absolutly hated TDAT? I mean hated it. Almost walked out of the theater during it!

_________________
See above.


Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:46 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
How dare you call the great Minnie Driver a nobody

Image


Moulin Rouge did bad even with big stars, a lot of publicity (Kidman's divorce, premiere in Cannes, etc.). And the film was very well received (I liked it as well, it's got spunk).


Oh, and I think TPOTO will surpass Moulin Rouge's gross, but will be extremely lucky to gross half of Chicago's total. This might be an indication that the musical is not quite ready for a comeback just yet.

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:48 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
RogueCommander wrote:
Guess I was the only one who absolutly hated TDAT? I mean hated it. Almost walked out of the theater during it!



:shock: :?:


I just said I fast-forwarded most of it :lol:

So obviously I'm not favourably disposed towards it either, at all!!!

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:49 am
Profile WWW
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
22 movies over 1m for the first time ever this wknd oh yeah 8) well it may not be the first time ever but 22 films oh yeah 8)

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:51 am
Profile WWW
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
box_2005 wrote:
Moulin Rouge did bad even with big stars, a lot of publicity (Kidman's divorce, premiere in Cannes, etc.). And the film was very well received (I liked it as well, it's got spunk).

Moulin Rouge also had quite a lot of time to sink in with its audience before it was accepted. It is also a film that is nearly brilliant.

However, I myself loved it from the get go, and yes, I was one of the fortunate few who saw it in the theater.

Quote:
Oh, and I think TPOTO will surpass Moulin Rouge's gross

I wouldn't disagree but the one thing that these two FILMS (not plays, but films) will have a problem with is that in 10 years people will really only remember Moulin Rouge! and remember Chicago more for its Best Picture status than the film itself. That's what really counts.

Phantom of the Opera will probably forever be thought of, first and foremost, as a stage show, not a film.

Personally, I think part of the reason why I don't want to see Phantom of the Opera film is that without Michael Crawford the music just... well... it isn't Phantom of the Opera. I'm afraid his performance/voice is forever tied to the stage show for me. I downloaded some samples and a few full songs on streaming and I have to tell you... the film cast has no grasp on the material.


Last edited by andaroo1 on Sun Jan 02, 2005 1:02 am, edited 1 time in total.



Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:58 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
BJ wrote:
22 movies over 1m for the first time ever this wknd oh yeah 8) well it may not be the first time ever but 22 films oh yeah 8)



3-Day Weekend, I don't think we've ever had that (BOM's data pre-1999 is only for top 12), but, Weekend 7 of 1999, we had 22 $1m films, but that was a 4-Day Weekend:



1 Message in a Bottle $18,852,976 ( - | 2,538 | $7,428 | $18,852,976 )
2 Payback $17,719,502 ( -16.50% | 2,751 | $6,441 | $44,054,084 )
3 My Favorite Martian $11,181,043 ( - | 2,275 | $4,914 | $11,181,043 )
4 She's All That $10,040,576 ( -13.80% | 2,654 | $3,783 | $42,649,931 )
5 Blast from the Past $9,160,263 ( - | 2,542 | $3,603 | $9,160,263 )
6 Shakespeare in Love $9,050,029 ( 161.30% | 1,956 | $4,626 | $46,663,122 )
7 Saving Private Ryan $3,952,491 ( 9.50% | 1,140 | $3,467 | $199,915,673 )
8 Rushmore $3,739,133 ( 103.00% | 573 | $6,525 | $6,274,480 )
9 Patch Adams $3,570,665 ( -19.00% | 2,101 | $1,699 | $127,005,430 )
10 Varsity Blues $3,147,635 ( -18.10% | 2,036 | $1,545 | $48,190,950 )
11 Life is Beautiful $2,830,316 ( 237.90% | 644 | $4,394 | $21,634,804 )
12 The Thin Red Line $1,866,991 ( -2.40% | 1,301 | $1,435 | $33,032,012 )
13 A Civil Action $1,765,313 ( -42.60% | 1,403 | $1,258 | $54,089,852 )
14 The Prince of Egypt $1,535,837 ( -20.10% | 1,408 | $1,090 | $95,354,781 )
15 Waking Ned Devine $1,278,004 ( -4.60% | 482 | $2,651 | $20,257,348 )
16 Stepmom $1,277,565 ( -49.20% | 1,564 | $816 | $89,158,694 )
17 The Rugrats Movie $1,254,878 ( 146.70% | 840 | $1,493 | $96,174,410 )
18 A Simple Planà $1,221,786 ( -10.60% | 675 | $1,810 | $13,717,155 )
19 You've Got Mail $1,170,708 ( -46.50% | 1,601 | $731 | $112,763,180 )
20 Elizabethà $1,084,428 ( 101.30% | 483 | $2,245 | $22,673,802 )
21 A Bug's Life $1,069,012 ( -24.60% | 979 | $1,091 | $157,267,797 )
22 The Waterboy $1,058,915 ( -1.10% | 721 | $1,468 | $158,012,801 )
23 Simply Irresistible $997,177 ( -55.30% | 1,353 | $737 | $3,713,570 )
24 Mighty Joe Young $717,883 ( -33.70% | 802 | $895 | $47,841,489 )
25 Enemy of the State $662,328 ( -15.50% | 618 | $1,071 | $109,198,670 )
26 T-Rex: Back to the Cretaceous (IMAX) $587,323 ( 73.50% | 28 | $20,975 | $5,722,606 )
27 Little Voice $533,960 ( 4.90% | 215 | $2,483 | $3,495,950 )
28 Central Station $505,237 ( 97.50% | 102 | $4,953 | $2,491,808 )
29 Hilary and Jackie $493,731 ( -6.80% | 300 | $1,645 | $3,228,335 )
30 At First Sight $479,393 ( -67.30% | 895 | $535 | $21,577,205 )

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:59 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
andaroo wrote:
box_2005 wrote:
Moulin Rouge did bad even with big stars, a lot of publicity (Kidman's divorce, premiere in Cannes, etc.). And the film was very well received (I liked it as well, it's got spunk).

Moulin Rouge also had quite a lot of time to sink in with its audience before it was accepted. It is also a film that is nearly brilliant.




That's a great point you bring up, because it wasn't until quite a bit after its release that I decided to look into it, and was surprised at how much I liked it.


I makes me wish Luhrman's Alexander was in release right now and not Stone's :) I hope he still goes ahead with it; he could give us a masterpiece.

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Sun Jan 02, 2005 1:01 am
Profile WWW
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
I also think the popularity of stage shows like Phantom of the Opera are really hard to gauge with the box office. Does anybody think a cinema production of Cats would do well these days? Or a real movie version of A Chorus Line? Arguably they are far more popular and well known than Phanom of the Opera.

What about Rent? Do we think it can do $100 million? Chicago had loads of big stars and Miramax so it had a lot going for it. It also had the benefit of being a much less known production.

Phantom is unknowns with a questionable director, with a studio who doesn't seem to care (lack of ads, Million Dollar Baby, etc.), under the weight of 16+ years of history with more impressive casts.


Sun Jan 02, 2005 1:07 am
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
box_2005 wrote:
andaroo wrote:
box_2005 wrote:
Moulin Rouge did bad even with big stars, a lot of publicity (Kidman's divorce, premiere in Cannes, etc.). And the film was very well received (I liked it as well, it's got spunk).

Moulin Rouge also had quite a lot of time to sink in with its audience before it was accepted. It is also a film that is nearly brilliant.




That's a great point you bring up, because it wasn't until quite a bit after its release that I decided to look into it, and was surprised at how much I liked it.


I makes me wish Luhrman's Alexander was in release right now and not Stone's :) I hope he still goes ahead with it; he could give us a masterpiece.


I don't think that after Stone's fiasco anyone will dare to bring Alexander to the big screen anytime soon.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Jan 02, 2005 1:07 am
Profile WWW
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
box_2005 wrote:
BJ wrote:
22 movies over 1m for the first time ever this wknd oh yeah 8) well it may not be the first time ever but 22 films oh yeah 8)



3-Day Weekend, I don't think we've ever had that (BOM's data pre-1999 is only for top 12), but, Weekend 7 of 1999, we had 22 $1m films, but that was a 4-Day Weekend:



1 Message in a Bottle $18,852,976 ( - | 2,538 | $7,428 | $18,852,976 )
2 Payback $17,719,502 ( -16.50% | 2,751 | $6,441 | $44,054,084 )
3 My Favorite Martian $11,181,043 ( - | 2,275 | $4,914 | $11,181,043 )
4 She's All That $10,040,576 ( -13.80% | 2,654 | $3,783 | $42,649,931 )
5 Blast from the Past $9,160,263 ( - | 2,542 | $3,603 | $9,160,263 )
6 Shakespeare in Love $9,050,029 ( 161.30% | 1,956 | $4,626 | $46,663,122 )
7 Saving Private Ryan $3,952,491 ( 9.50% | 1,140 | $3,467 | $199,915,673 )
8 Rushmore $3,739,133 ( 103.00% | 573 | $6,525 | $6,274,480 )
9 Patch Adams $3,570,665 ( -19.00% | 2,101 | $1,699 | $127,005,430 )
10 Varsity Blues $3,147,635 ( -18.10% | 2,036 | $1,545 | $48,190,950 )
11 Life is Beautiful $2,830,316 ( 237.90% | 644 | $4,394 | $21,634,804 )
12 The Thin Red Line $1,866,991 ( -2.40% | 1,301 | $1,435 | $33,032,012 )
13 A Civil Action $1,765,313 ( -42.60% | 1,403 | $1,258 | $54,089,852 )
14 The Prince of Egypt $1,535,837 ( -20.10% | 1,408 | $1,090 | $95,354,781 )
15 Waking Ned Devine $1,278,004 ( -4.60% | 482 | $2,651 | $20,257,348 )
16 Stepmom $1,277,565 ( -49.20% | 1,564 | $816 | $89,158,694 )
17 The Rugrats Movie $1,254,878 ( 146.70% | 840 | $1,493 | $96,174,410 )
18 A Simple Planà $1,221,786 ( -10.60% | 675 | $1,810 | $13,717,155 )
19 You've Got Mail $1,170,708 ( -46.50% | 1,601 | $731 | $112,763,180 )
20 Elizabethà $1,084,428 ( 101.30% | 483 | $2,245 | $22,673,802 )
21 A Bug's Life $1,069,012 ( -24.60% | 979 | $1,091 | $157,267,797 )
22 The Waterboy $1,058,915 ( -1.10% | 721 | $1,468 | $158,012,801 )
23 Simply Irresistible $997,177 ( -55.30% | 1,353 | $737 | $3,713,570 )
24 Mighty Joe Young $717,883 ( -33.70% | 802 | $895 | $47,841,489 )
25 Enemy of the State $662,328 ( -15.50% | 618 | $1,071 | $109,198,670 )
26 T-Rex: Back to the Cretaceous (IMAX) $587,323 ( 73.50% | 28 | $20,975 | $5,722,606 )
27 Little Voice $533,960 ( 4.90% | 215 | $2,483 | $3,495,950 )
28 Central Station $505,237 ( 97.50% | 102 | $4,953 | $2,491,808 )
29 Hilary and Jackie $493,731 ( -6.80% | 300 | $1,645 | $3,228,335 )
30 At First Sight $479,393 ( -67.30% | 895 | $535 | $21,577,205 )


well than we are about to see that many over a 3 day 8)

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Sun Jan 02, 2005 1:32 am
Profile WWW
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
BJs wknd outlook 8)

1.Meet the Fockers - 44.52m (-4% from last Wknd)
2.Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events - 17.61m (+40% from last Wknd)
3.The Aviator - 15.26m (+77% from last Wknd)
4.Fat Albert - 14.93m (+49% from last Wknd)
5.Ocean's Twelve - 11.05m (+31.5% from last Wknd)
6.National Treasure - 8.24m (+108% from last Wknd)
7.Spanglish - 7.27m (+55.5%% from last Wknd)
8.The Polar Express - 7.00m (+7% from last Wknd)
9.The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou - 5.81m (+28% from last Wknd)
10.The Phantom of the Opera - 5.44m (+35.5% from last Wknd)
11.The Incredibles - 4.53m (+85% from last Wknd)
12.Darkness - 4.27m (-32% from last Wknd)

Top Ten Total: 137.13m
Top Twelve Total: 146m

8)

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Last edited by BJ on Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:48 am, edited 2 times in total.



Sun Jan 02, 2005 1:46 am
Profile WWW
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
BJ wrote:
Meet the Fockers:

Fri: 11.80m -1%

Sat: 30.68m +160%

Sun: 19.64m -34%

Wknd: 62.12m +39%


New

Fri: 11.80m -1%

Sat: 27.14m +130%

Sun: 17.64m -35%

Wknd: 56.58m + 22.5%

Even Newer

Fri: 11.80m -1%

Sat: 17.70m +50%

Sun: 15.02m -15%

Wknd: 44.52m -4%

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Last edited by BJ on Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:43 am, edited 1 time in total.



Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:10 am
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
Meet the Fockers

Friday: $11.80 million (-1%)
Saturday: $21.24 million (+80%)
Sunday: $13.38 million (-37%)

Weekend: $46.42 million (+1%)
Total Gross: $166.87 million

If the weekend goes like that, it will have passed Meet the Parents, which grossed $166,244,045. That's very close. :D


Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:17 am
Profile
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
Meet the Fockers

Friday: $11.80 million (-1%)
Saturday: $21.24 million (+80%)
Sunday: $13.38 million (-37%)

Weekend: $46.42 million (+1%)
Total Gross: $166.87 million

If the weekend goes like that, it will have passed Meet the Parents, which grossed $166,244,045. That's very close. :D


lower the sunday drop to around 10%-15% just looke at some movies from 93 and 82 not one had a sunday drop over 15% that I looked at

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:37 am
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68308
Post 
BJ wrote:
BJs wknd outlook 8)

1.Meet the Fockers - 44.52m (-4% from last Wknd)
2.Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events - 17.61m (+40% from last Wknd)
3.The Aviator - 15.26m (+77% from last Wknd)
4.Fat Albert - 14.93m (+49% from last Wknd)
5.Ocean's Twelve - 11.05m (+31.5% from last Wknd)
6.National Treasure - 8.24m (+108% from last Wknd)
7.Spanglish - 7.27m (+55.5%% from last Wknd)
8.The Polar Express - 7.00m (+7% from last Wknd)
9.The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou - 5.81m (+28% from last Wknd)
10.The Phantom of the Opera - 5.44m (+35.5% from last Wknd)
11.The Incredibles - 4.53m (+85% from last Wknd)
12.Darkness - 4.27m (-32% from last Wknd)

Top Ten Total: 137.13m
Top Twelve Total: 146m

8)


Why would movies increase this weekned coming?

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Sun Jan 02, 2005 7:49 am
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
BJ wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
Meet the Fockers

Friday: $11.80 million (-1%)
Saturday: $21.24 million (+80%)
Sunday: $13.38 million (-37%)

Weekend: $46.42 million (+1%)
Total Gross: $166.87 million

If the weekend goes like that, it will have passed Meet the Parents, which grossed $166,244,045. That's very close. :D


lower the sunday drop to around 10%-15% just looke at some movies from 93 and 82 not one had a sunday drop over 15% that I looked at


I'm almost positive that movies from 1993 and 1982 will have the same box office patterns as 2004/2005.


Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:00 pm
Profile
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
BJ wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
Meet the Fockers

Friday: $11.80 million (-1%)
Saturday: $21.24 million (+80%)
Sunday: $13.38 million (-37%)

Weekend: $46.42 million (+1%)
Total Gross: $166.87 million

If the weekend goes like that, it will have passed Meet the Parents, which grossed $166,244,045. That's very close. :D


lower the sunday drop to around 10%-15% just looke at some movies from 93 and 82 not one had a sunday drop over 15% that I looked at


I'm almost positive that movies from 1993 and 1982 will have the same box office patterns as 2004/2005.


they did thouout the wk. Infact the movies now are droping the same as they did then so I expect samll sunday drops 8)

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:02 pm
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
BJ wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
I wonder if Meet the Fockers can pass $450 million worldwide :shock:

@BJ

Why the heck would Lemony Snicket's increase 70% tomorrow, even though back in 1999 the family movies increased only by 30-50% on Saturday and that DESPITE bigger Friday drops.


Acualy it probably will Lecter :wink:

Lemony Snicket Increased 53% last saturday than another 27% on sunday. The fact that it increased that much on saturday should be reason enough Lecter. In 99 no kids film increased more than 30% on saturday, infact they had large sunday increases. This film is performing more like Bicentennial Man and Galaxy Quest so I asumed that over the wknd it would perform more like they did. Is there something wrong with that :?:


:wink:

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Mon Jan 03, 2005 12:23 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 148 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.