Author |
Message |
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm Posts: 16054
|
Two bad serves by Federer in the tie-break. That should seal it for Nadal
|
Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:14 pm |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Levy wrote: Two bad serves by Federer in the tie-break. That should seal it for Nadal
There must be a lot of mind games stuff going through RF head with those couple of bad forehand shots > WTF is happening?
Point match, come RF.........still want a 5th set.
|
Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:18 pm |
|
 |
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm Posts: 16054
|
Finito. A bit disappointing match. There were a few good points, but overall I hoped for more out of this matchup
|
Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:19 pm |
|
 |
Ripper
2.71828183
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm Posts: 7827 Location: please delete me
|
Federer is the most frustrating player to watch when he plays Nadal. I mean why does Roger put on his stupid hat when playing Nadal?
|
Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:19 pm |
|
 |
Squee
Squee
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm Posts: 13270 Location: Yuppieville
|
Oh well. Federer will win the French eventually. Barring any freaks of occurence, like a bad injury or if he pulls an Agassi for a couple of years.
_________________Setting most people on fire is wrong.Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee." 
|
Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:20 pm |
|
 |
Ripper
2.71828183
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm Posts: 7827 Location: please delete me
|
Squee wrote: Oh well. Federer will win the French eventually. Barring any freaks of occurence, like a bad injury or if he pulls an Agassi for a couple of years.
He'll win the French if someone else beats Nadal at the rate Federer is going becuase whenever he plays Nadal he suddenly has the mental toughness of Amelie Mauresmo.
|
Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:30 pm |
|
 |
Squee
Squee
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm Posts: 13270 Location: Yuppieville
|
Ripper wrote: Squee wrote: Oh well. Federer will win the French eventually. Barring any freaks of occurence, like a bad injury or if he pulls an Agassi for a couple of years. He'll win the French if someone else beats Nadal at the rate Federer is going becuase whenever he plays Nadal he suddenly has the mental toughness of Amelie Mauresmo.
At least it isnt the mental toughness of Daniella Hantchucova. Even Mauresmo managed to win a grand slam.
_________________Setting most people on fire is wrong.Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee." 
|
Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:39 pm |
|
 |
Ripper
2.71828183
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm Posts: 7827 Location: please delete me
|
Squee wrote: Ripper wrote: Squee wrote: Oh well. Federer will win the French eventually. Barring any freaks of occurence, like a bad injury or if he pulls an Agassi for a couple of years. He'll win the French if someone else beats Nadal at the rate Federer is going becuase whenever he plays Nadal he suddenly has the mental toughness of Amelie Mauresmo. At least it isnt the mental toughness of Daniella Hantchucova. Even Mauresmo managed to win a grand slam.
I still consider that some sort of anomaly, I mean both her and Clisters managed to win, and Myskina has a slam as well, what the hell is wrong with the world?
|
Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:50 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40463
|
Gah, the one time I was cheering for Federer, and he loses.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sun Jun 11, 2006 3:19 pm |
|
 |
dar
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 9:01 pm Posts: 1702
|
Ripper wrote: Federer is the most frustrating player to watch when he plays Nadal. I mean why does Roger put on his stupid hat when playing Nadal?
Well, Nadal uses an incredible topspin that makes life really hard for all his opponents on clay... but he also seems to get a little bit under Federer´s skin. He also beated him this year on hard (Dubai)
But before people start trashing Roger, some scary stats: Nadal has not lost one single match in RG. Two times he played the tournament, two victories. Even more so, if I remember correctly, no player has taken him to 5 sets in Paris. And he has won 60 games in a row on clay. He truly is the best on clay, no doubt about it. Federer is number two, I´d say.
_________________You Are a Strawberry Daiquiri
What Mixed Drink Are You?
http://www.blogthings.com/whatmixeddrinkareyouquiz/
|
Sun Jun 11, 2006 3:58 pm |
|
 |
Squee
Squee
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm Posts: 13270 Location: Yuppieville
|
I don't see how anyone can really trash someone who has won 3 of the last 4 grandslams and 7 in the last 3 seasons.
_________________Setting most people on fire is wrong.Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee." 
|
Sun Jun 11, 2006 5:48 pm |
|
 |
Ripper
2.71828183
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm Posts: 7827 Location: please delete me
|
dar wrote: Ripper wrote: Federer is the most frustrating player to watch when he plays Nadal. I mean why does Roger put on his stupid hat when playing Nadal? Well, Nadal uses an incredible topspin that makes life really hard for all his opponents on clay... but he also seems to get a little bit under Federer´s skin. He also beated him this year on hard (Dubai) But before people start trashing Roger, some scary stats: Nadal has not lost one single match in RG. Two times he played the tournament, two victories. Even more so, if I remember correctly, no player has taken him to 5 sets in Paris. And he has won 60 games in a row on clay. He truly is the best on clay, no doubt about it. Federer is number two, I´d say.
I love Roger, that's why I am so damn mad, I know he can beat Nadal, its mental. Nadal is aweso eon Clay, but Roger never brings his A game against Nadal, never. He had Nadal on a clay match this year and blew it, and today after the first set he all but disappeared except for a few points. You can't attack a serve from 20 feet behind the baseline. I mean, Roger doens;t play like he thinks he can beat Nadal, its maddening.
|
Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:45 pm |
|
 |
Squee
Squee
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm Posts: 13270 Location: Yuppieville
|
2 reasons why I am rooting for Federer, despite him being so dominant.
1. I want Pete Samprass to no longer be thought of by many to be the best ever, as if Federer does what I think he will do, win all 4 slams and shatter Samprass' overall slam record, no one will be able to deny Federer. Who, despite him being uninteresting at times, is still more charasmatic than Samprass.
2. One of the reasons I hated Samprass was that he beat my two favorite players, Ivanesovic and Agassi like... every time he faced them. With Federer's dominance, he really isnt beating anyone I find all that interesting
_________________Setting most people on fire is wrong.Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee." 
|
Sun Jun 11, 2006 8:41 pm |
|
 |
AgentX
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm Posts: 2303 Location: 905
|
Wimbledon Ladies Seeds
1 Amelie Mauresmo (FRA)
2 Kim Clijsters (BEL)
3 Justine Henin-Hardenne (BEL)
4 Maria Sharapova (RUS)
5 Nadia Petrova (RUS)
6 Svetlana Kuznetsova (RUS)
7 Venus Williams (USA) <-- Up 5 spots from World Ranking
8 Elena Dementieva (RUS)
9 Patty Schnyder (SUI)
10 Anastasia Myskina (RUS)
11 Nicole Vaidisova (CZE)
12 Francesca Schiavone (ITA)
13 Martina Hingis (SUI)
14 Anna-Lena Groenefeld (GER)
15 Dinara Safina (RUS)
16 Daniela Hantuchova (SVK)
17 Flavia Pennetta (ITA)
18 Maria Kirilenko (RUS)
19 Ai Sugiyama (JPN)
20 Ana Ivanovic (SCG)
21 Shahar Peer (ISR)
22 Katarina Srebotnik (SLO)
23 Nathalie Dechy (FRA)
24 Anabel Medina Garrigues (ESP)
25 Marion Bartoli (FRA)
26 Elena Likhovtseva (RUS)
27 Jelena Jankovic (SCG)
28 Li Na (CHN)
29 Sofia Arvidsson (SWE)
30 Tatiana Golovin (FRA)
31 Anna Chakvetadze (RUS)
32 Gisela Dulko (ARG)
Wimbledon Gentlemen's Seeding
1 Roger Federer (SUI)
2 Rafael Nadal (ESP)
3 Andy Roddick (USA) <-- Up 2
4 David Nalbandian (ARG)
5 Ivan Ljubicic (CRO)
6 Lleyton Hewitt (AUS) <-- Up 3
7 Mario Ancic (CRO) <-- Up 5
8 James Blake (USA)
9 Nikolay Davydenko (RUS)
10 Fernando Gonzalez (CHL)
11 Tommy Robredo (SPA)
12 Thomas Johansson (SWE) <-- Up 9
13 Tomas Berdych (CZE)
14 Radek Stepanek (CZE)
15 Sebastien Grosjean (FRA) <-- Up 11
16 Gaston Gaudio (ARG)
17 Robby Ginepri (USA)
18 Nicolas Kiefer (GER)
19 Marcos Baghdatis (CYP)
20 Tommy Haas (GER)
21 Dominik Hrbaty (SVK)
22 Gael Monfils (FRA)
23 Jarkko Nieminen (FIN)
24 David Ferrer (ESP)
25 Juan Carlos Ferrero (ESP)
26 Andre Agassi (USA) <-- Down 6
27 Olivier Rochus (BEL)
28 Dmitry Tursunov (RUS)
29 Fernando Verdasco (ESP)
30 Kristof Vliegen (BEL)
31 Nicolas Massu (CHL)
32 Paul-Henri Mathieu (FRA)
Last edited by AgentX on Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed Jun 21, 2006 1:27 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
How is Roddick still the third seed? How long has it been since he's won a Grand Slam tournament?
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Wed Jun 21, 2006 1:37 pm |
|
 |
AgentX
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm Posts: 2303 Location: 905
|
His only GS came at the 2003 US Open.
He actually got bumped up 2 spots, he usually does well at Wimbledon so I think it's a deserved bump.
|
Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:04 pm |
|
 |
AgentX
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm Posts: 2303 Location: 905
|
Projected Ladies Singles Draw R16
MAURESMO, Amelie FRA [1] vs SAFINA, Dinara RUS [14]
MYSKINA, Anastasia RUS [9] vs WILLIAMS, Venus USA [6]
SHARAPOVA, Maria RUS [4] vs PENNETTA, Flavia ITA [16]
SCHIAVONE, Francesca ITA [11] vs DEMENTIEVA, Elena RUS [7]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCHNYDER, Patty SUI [8] vs HINGIS, Martina SUI [12]
HANTUCHOVA, Daniela SVK [15] vs HENIN-HARDENNE, Justine BEL [3]
KUZNETSOVA, Svetlana RUS [5] vs VAIDISOVA, Nicole CZE [10]
GROENEFELD, Anna-Lena GER [13] vs CLIJSTERS, Kim BEL [2]
Looks like we're going to have a rematch of one of last years Semi's (I think it was SF) in the top half with Venus v Maria and another all Belgian SF looms in the bottom half unless Hingis can upset JHH.
|
Fri Jun 23, 2006 12:22 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40463
|
I predict Federer and JHH.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Fri Jun 23, 2006 12:28 pm |
|
 |
AgentX
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm Posts: 2303 Location: 905
|
Shack wrote: I predict Federer and JHH.
I see you're going out on a limb. 
|
Fri Jun 23, 2006 12:35 pm |
|
 |
AgentX
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm Posts: 2303 Location: 905
|
Gentlemen's Singles Projected R16
FEDERER, Roger SUI [1] vs. BERDYCH, Tomas CZE [13]
ROBREDO, Tommy ESP [11] vs. ANCIC, Mario CRO [7]
NALBANDIAN, David ARG [4] vs. STEPANEK, Radek CZE [14]
JOHANSSON, Thomas SWE [12] vs. BLAKE, James USA [7]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEWITT, Lleyton AUS [6] vs. GONZALEZ, Fernando CHI [10]
GROSJEAN, Sebastien FRA [15] vs. RODDICK, Andy USA [3]
LJUBICIC, Ivan CRO [5] vs. DAVYDENKO, Nikolay RUS [9]
GAUDIO, Gaston ARG [16] vs. NADAL, Rafael ESP [2]
Federer's got a tough draw to get to this point. He has Gasquet in the first and possibly Henman in the second. Roger hasn't been playing that well lately. He had to save multiple match points against Rochus in Halle, so if he continues to play like that I can see him losing rather quickly, but I think he'll pick up his game for The Championships.
|
Fri Jun 23, 2006 12:46 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40463
|
Roddick won't beat Federer, he's never even gotten close before. I think the closest he's came at Wimbledon was taking the first set in one of the finals, before Roger murdered him in the next 3. Nadal also isn't much away from Clay.
Federer has no real rival IMO. He's unstoppable.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Fri Jun 23, 2006 5:43 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40463
|
Yeah I know, I meant at Wimbledon he has no rival.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:57 am |
|
 |
Ripper
2.71828183
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm Posts: 7827 Location: please delete me
|
Magnus wrote: Shack wrote: Yeah I know, I meant at Wimbledon he has no rival. OH. That I agree. Which is why I want Roddick to win because I feel it would be good for tennis. Tennis is a sport that thrives on a good rivarly. In fact, when there is a rivarly, tennis is one of the best sports out there.
I've never taken to Roddick as a player, I'd much rather see James Blake make it far in the tournament.
|
Wed Jun 28, 2006 11:49 am |
|
 |
Squee
Squee
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm Posts: 13270 Location: Yuppieville
|
Roddick doesnt have the game to beat Federer. It's just that simple!
_________________Setting most people on fire is wrong.Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee." 
|
Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:01 pm |
|
 |
Squee
Squee
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm Posts: 13270 Location: Yuppieville
|
Well at least Henman will lose in the 2nd round this year instead of teasing the British fans and getting all the way to the Semis to choke it away.
_________________Setting most people on fire is wrong.Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee." 
|
Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:28 pm |
|
|