Author |
Message |
El Maskado
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm Posts: 21572
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
Now Baba if you are talking about a certain someone who would go into the gaming forum with his bipolar disorder and spew crap like "HAHAHAHA Halo is kicking the shit out of GTA" or "HAHAHAHAH GTA is showing how shitty the HALO reviews are. I will not support Microsoft ever again" depending on how the reviews go one way or another, I would consider a ban for that particular person
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:51 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
i've provided a verbal warning to him just now in cinemania. official warnings and bannings are right around the corner for that individual.
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:55 pm |
|
 |
jujubee
Forum General
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 11:45 pm Posts: 6447
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
french man wrote: That's a good explanation, and I can't argue with that. But you have people searching, just waiting for him to say something they can consider offensive enough to ban him. It's the mentality some of the people here have. But I can't disagree with what you just said. That probably has to do with the way he was banned for acting the way he was and then allowed back to continue acting that way. It's possible that he was banned very quickly to begin with, which may not have been fair to him, but it gave everyone a reason to single him out when he was allowed back. I'm sure the mods/admins were trying to be fair to everyone, but it did end up sending mixed signals. I don't think the community is normally unwelcoming when faced with someone who knows how to behave in a forum.
_________________ ......
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:56 pm |
|
 |
getluv
i break the rules, so i don't care
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm Posts: 20411
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
bABA, btw, i don't agree with my warning. I sent Nebs the complaint form already. Looking forward to discussing it further.
...
Roid. i love you guys in the game forums.
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:57 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
jujubee wrote: french man wrote: That's a good explanation, and I can't argue with that. But you have people searching, just waiting for him to say something they can consider offensive enough to ban him. It's the mentality some of the people here have. But I can't disagree with what you just said. That probably has to do with the way he was banned for acting the way he was and then allowed back to continue acting that way. It's possible that he was banned very quickly to begin with, which may not have been fair to him, but it gave everyone a reason to single him out when he was allowed back. I'm sure the mods/admins were trying to be fair to everyone, but it did end up sending mixed signals. I don't think the community is normally unwelcoming when faced with someone who knows how to behave in a forum. here is where i will disagree with you and which is why it took this long for him to get banned. he came back and was posting fine everywhere, to an extent, even the watercooler. it went on for about 2 to 3 days but frenchie is right that people kept baiting. then he went back to being himself.
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:57 pm |
|
 |
getluv
i break the rules, so i don't care
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm Posts: 20411
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
bABA wrote: jujubee wrote: french man wrote: That's a good explanation, and I can't argue with that. But you have people searching, just waiting for him to say something they can consider offensive enough to ban him. It's the mentality some of the people here have. But I can't disagree with what you just said. That probably has to do with the way he was banned for acting the way he was and then allowed back to continue acting that way. It's possible that he was banned very quickly to begin with, which may not have been fair to him, but it gave everyone a reason to single him out when he was allowed back. I'm sure the mods/admins were trying to be fair to everyone, but it did end up sending mixed signals. I don't think the community is normally unwelcoming when faced with someone who knows how to behave in a forum. here is where i will disagree with you and which is why it took this long for him to get banned. he came back and was posting fine everywhere, to an extent, even the watercooler. it went on for about 2 to 3 days but frenchie is right that people kept baiting. then he went back to being himself. i disagree. i made an effort.
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:58 pm |
|
 |
El Maskado
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm Posts: 21572
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
Baba That fox shill really has an annoying personality. Hes like the New Delhi's version of Borat except hes not funny at all. But yeah although his acts arent like breaking any rules, his presence and posts are irritating and annoying to no end. I have to learn how to troll like him
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:59 pm |
|
 |
jujubee
Forum General
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 11:45 pm Posts: 6447
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
bABA wrote: jujubee wrote: french man wrote: That's a good explanation, and I can't argue with that. But you have people searching, just waiting for him to say something they can consider offensive enough to ban him. It's the mentality some of the people here have. But I can't disagree with what you just said. That probably has to do with the way he was banned for acting the way he was and then allowed back to continue acting that way. It's possible that he was banned very quickly to begin with, which may not have been fair to him, but it gave everyone a reason to single him out when he was allowed back. I'm sure the mods/admins were trying to be fair to everyone, but it did end up sending mixed signals. I don't think the community is normally unwelcoming when faced with someone who knows how to behave in a forum. here is where i will disagree with you and which is why it took this long for him to get banned. he came back and was posting fine everywhere, to an extent, even the watercooler. it went on for about 2 to 3 days but frenchie is right that people kept baiting. then he went back to being himself. I may be wrong. I was mostly not around when he showed up to begin with and banned. I was still mostly gone when he first came back as well. All I know is he was banned and when I first really noticed him, he seemed like all he wanted to do was bait everyone.
_________________ ......
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:01 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
dr getluv wrote: bABA, btw, i don't agree with my warning. I sent Nebs the complaint form already. Looking forward to discussing it further.
...
Roid. i love you guys in the game forums. oh well that changes everything. come to think of it, no one whose ever been warned, banned at the forum has ever agreed with it. maybe i should let them all back or unwarn them. The warning was not upto debate. it was a warning and the reasoning sent. it won't be reserved in anyway.
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:09 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
jujubee wrote: bABA wrote: jujubee wrote: french man wrote: That's a good explanation, and I can't argue with that. But you have people searching, just waiting for him to say something they can consider offensive enough to ban him. It's the mentality some of the people here have. But I can't disagree with what you just said. That probably has to do with the way he was banned for acting the way he was and then allowed back to continue acting that way. It's possible that he was banned very quickly to begin with, which may not have been fair to him, but it gave everyone a reason to single him out when he was allowed back. I'm sure the mods/admins were trying to be fair to everyone, but it did end up sending mixed signals. I don't think the community is normally unwelcoming when faced with someone who knows how to behave in a forum. here is where i will disagree with you and which is why it took this long for him to get banned. he came back and was posting fine everywhere, to an extent, even the watercooler. it went on for about 2 to 3 days but frenchie is right that people kept baiting. then he went back to being himself. I may be wrong. I was mostly not around when he showed up to begin with and banned. I was still mostly gone when he first came back as well. All I know is he was banned and when I first really noticed him, he seemed like all he wanted to do was bait everyone. initially, thats all he did which is why he was banned. however, after that, i spoke with him and he was very careful about his actions and even asked me if what he was about to do was acceptable. i took it all into account so hence, the man wasn't getting banned.
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:10 pm |
|
 |
getluv
i break the rules, so i don't care
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm Posts: 20411
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
bABA wrote: dr getluv wrote: bABA, btw, i don't agree with my warning. I sent Nebs the complaint form already. Looking forward to discussing it further.
...
Roid. i love you guys in the game forums. oh well that changes everything. come to think of it, no one whose ever been warned, banned at the forum has ever agreed with it. maybe i should let them all back or unwarn them. The warning was not upto debate. it was a warning and the reasoning sent. it won't be reserved in anyway. that's fine. next time someone accuses you of having sex with underage boys lets see how you handle it. ... oh and difference between the banned ones and me, is that i'm NOT banned. i can just be vocal about the horrible injustice i'm being served.
Last edited by getluv on Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:11 pm |
|
 |
getluv
i break the rules, so i don't care
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm Posts: 20411
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
bABA wrote: jujubee wrote: bABA wrote: jujubee wrote: french man wrote: That's a good explanation, and I can't argue with that. But you have people searching, just waiting for him to say something they can consider offensive enough to ban him. It's the mentality some of the people here have. But I can't disagree with what you just said. That probably has to do with the way he was banned for acting the way he was and then allowed back to continue acting that way. It's possible that he was banned very quickly to begin with, which may not have been fair to him, but it gave everyone a reason to single him out when he was allowed back. I'm sure the mods/admins were trying to be fair to everyone, but it did end up sending mixed signals. I don't think the community is normally unwelcoming when faced with someone who knows how to behave in a forum. here is where i will disagree with you and which is why it took this long for him to get banned. he came back and was posting fine everywhere, to an extent, even the watercooler. it went on for about 2 to 3 days but frenchie is right that people kept baiting. then he went back to being himself. I may be wrong. I was mostly not around when he showed up to begin with and banned. I was still mostly gone when he first came back as well. All I know is he was banned and when I first really noticed him, he seemed like all he wanted to do was bait everyone. initially, thats all he did which is why he was banned. however, after that, i spoke with him and he was very careful about his actions and even asked me if what he was about to do was acceptable. i took it all into account so hence, the man wasn't getting banned. That makes Jailbird look more pathetic, and it's all your fault. pre-approved posts. lmfao. I sense a bit of remorse coming from you bABA. i find it sad to be honest.
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:19 pm |
|
 |
paper
Artie the One-Man Party
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:53 pm Posts: 4632
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
dr getluv wrote: bABA wrote: dr getluv wrote: bABA, btw, i don't agree with my warning. I sent Nebs the complaint form already. Looking forward to discussing it further.
...
Roid. i love you guys in the game forums. oh well that changes everything. come to think of it, no one whose ever been warned, banned at the forum has ever agreed with it. maybe i should let them all back or unwarn them. The warning was not upto debate. it was a warning and the reasoning sent. it won't be reserved in anyway. that's fine. next time someone accuses you of having sex with underage boys lets see how you handle it.
... oh and difference between the banned ones and me, is that i'm NOT banned. i can just be vocal about the horrible injustice i'm being served. I think being told your going to drink someone else's piss from a urinal is a good enough example of shit bABA's already handled much better than you did.
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:31 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
french
take your own advice and stop arguing with him.
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:35 pm |
|
 |
paper
Artie the One-Man Party
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:53 pm Posts: 4632
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
I'M TAKING YOU ON TOO!!!!!!!
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:36 pm |
|
 |
getluv
i break the rules, so i don't care
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm Posts: 20411
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
french man wrote: dr getluv wrote: bABA wrote: dr getluv wrote: bABA, btw, i don't agree with my warning. I sent Nebs the complaint form already. Looking forward to discussing it further.
...
Roid. i love you guys in the game forums. oh well that changes everything. come to think of it, no one whose ever been warned, banned at the forum has ever agreed with it. maybe i should let them all back or unwarn them. The warning was not upto debate. it was a warning and the reasoning sent. it won't be reserved in anyway. that's fine. next time someone accuses you of having sex with underage boys lets see how you handle it.
... oh and difference between the banned ones and me, is that i'm NOT banned. i can just be vocal about the horrible injustice i'm being served. I think being told your going to drink someone else's piss from a urinal is a good enough example of shit bABA's already handled much better than you did. especially when mine is sarcastic. i've said much worse to baba and if baba actually believed i meant that then bABA really doesn't know me at all. oh and frenchy i find it hilarious how you can find the movie "I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry" offensive, and something Jailbird says hilarious. and here you are preaching shit about irony. lmfao. gtfo.
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:39 pm |
|
 |
getluv
i break the rules, so i don't care
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm Posts: 20411
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
french man wrote: I'M TAKING YOU ON TOO!!!!!!! you do not know how to pick your battles, do you?
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:41 pm |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
dr getluv wrote: I think over the past 12 months i've changed as a poster. I've been really nice to everyone over the past few months, including Munkey, Zingaling, MovieDude and Squee. I'd argue that you've never been anything more than civil with me, but I would actually agree that you're much less of a cunt than you used to be.  That said, if you have received a warning from the administrators, I'd personally suggest taking it a bit more seriously.
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:06 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
Just... who the hell is Jailbird??!!!??
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:13 pm |
|
 |
Squee
Squee
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm Posts: 13270 Location: Yuppieville
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
dr getluv wrote: I think over the past 12 months i've changed as a poster. I've been really nice to everyone over the past few months, including Munkey, Zingaling, MovieDude and Squee.
I didn't realize you were being mean to me before the past 12 months... 
_________________Setting most people on fire is wrong.Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee." 
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:13 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
I like getluv lately. He actually makes me laugh sometimes. 
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 6:04 pm |
|
 |
Barrabás
llegó a la casa vía marítima
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm Posts: 6325 Location: la gran casa de la esquina
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
I'm glad this problem got sorted out.
_________________ .
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 6:06 pm |
|
 |
Korrgan
problem?
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:52 am Posts: 15515 Location: Bait Shop
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
_________________
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 7:36 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
All the posters up for banning are on my foe list already, so....
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:18 pm |
|
 |
getluv
i break the rules, so i don't care
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm Posts: 20411
|
 Re: Shouldn't this be enough to ban him?
Squee wrote: dr getluv wrote: I think over the past 12 months i've changed as a poster. I've been really nice to everyone over the past few months, including Munkey, Zingaling, MovieDude and Squee.
I didn't realize you were being mean to me before the past 12 months... :huh: you actually annoy me because i love u too much.
|
Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:47 pm |
|
|