Author |
Message |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
 Why couldnt Ray make 100mil?
Before anybody jumps on me for making a thread like this let me explain. 70mil is quite impressive, but why couldnt it get to 100mil and beyond? The movie was probably one of the most well recieved movies of the year ( it has a A- on Yahoo and 8.1 on IMDb ) yet it still had drops of around 40% each week, was it that the BO was just over saturated with movies or that people just didnt wanna see it no matter the wom?
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
Last edited by Joker's Thug #3 on Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:48 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
:-s I'm on to you...
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:49 pm |
|
 |
BacktotheFuture
I'm Batman
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:53 pm Posts: 5554 Location: Long Island
|
This might be the worst thread ever.
|
Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:50 pm |
|
 |
sako
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:07 pm Posts: 1684
|
Nothing went wrong. Not enough people were interested in it.
|
Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:50 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Ray was a very successful film, but it was somewhat fromloaded due to the hype surrounding it (yes, it was there) and the fact that urban flicks (this is somewhat of an urban flick) are usually frontloaded. If it gets nominated for Best Picture, expect a rerelease and it mght even hit $85-90 million then.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:54 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
I think it did okay. Nothing was really expected for this to be big.
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:58 pm |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Ray was a very successful film, but it was somewhat fromloaded due to the hype surrounding it (yes, it was there) and the fact that urban flicks (this is somewhat of an urban flick) are usually frontloaded. If it gets nominated for Best Picture, expect a rerelease and it mght even hit $85-90 million then. Wont happen, they decided to go to Dvd early ( Feb 1 ) and make more profit with that then just rerelease it on the big screen.
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:58 pm |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
Mr. X wrote: I think it did okay. Nothing was really expected for this to be big. I thought the wom would push it further.
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:59 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Killuminati510 wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Ray was a very successful film, but it was somewhat fromloaded due to the hype surrounding it (yes, it was there) and the fact that urban flicks (this is somewhat of an urban flick) are usually frontloaded. If it gets nominated for Best Picture, expect a rerelease and it mght even hit $85-90 million then. Wont happen, they decided to go to Dvd early ( Feb 1 ) and make more profit with that then just rerelease it on the big screen.
Oh...I thought it was coming out on DVD in March...
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:00 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
Killuminati510 wrote: Mr. X wrote: I think it did okay. Nothing was really expected for this to be big. I thought the wom would push it further.
What was the multiplier? 3.5? That isn't terrible. But it's coming out Feb. 1st? That is awfully rushed. You have some points, needn't worry there. But, I don't think this would ever appeal to a mass audience anyway. WOM can't carry a movie all the time.
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:01 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
I'm surprised it didn't. After a great opening and great PTA like that, plus the excellent WOM and hype, I was almost positive it would have great legs pushing it past $100 million. Just didn't happen, though.
|
Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:45 am |
|
 |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
It's fairly straight-forward:
I jinxed it.
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:51 am |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
box_2005 wrote: It's fairly straight-forward:
I jinxed it. [-(
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:51 am |
|
 |
Raffiki
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am Posts: 9966
|
It was released at an odd time to release this sort of film, but it still opened pretty decently.
then the influx of all the huge animated films and the start of the Oscar shuffle kinda downplayed it.
It still had an incredible run, 40% drops are nothing to complain about, anything under that would be more than awesome.
I think one of the problems was the theatre drop. In the month that Oscar buzz builds the most (December), Ray needed to keep its theatre count high. Also granted it never really hit a high theatre count, it may be one of the reasons why it maxed out where it did.
I think if it kept a theatre count of 1,200+ or at least 1,000+ all throughout December and a bump in the count after nods, it could have easily gone up to $85 million (those winter break weekdays would have helped it alot)
_________________ Top Movies of 2009 1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man
Top Anticipated 2009 1. Nine
|
Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:55 am |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
Killuminati510 wrote: Wont happen, they decided to go to Dvd early ( Feb 1 ) and make more profit with that then just rerelease it on the big screen.
There is a high likelyhood of Ray being announced as Best Picture contendor. Didn't Lost in Translation get a pretty big re-release like 2 weeks before its DVD... and didn't it make a decent amount too?
|
Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:52 am |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
andaroo wrote: Killuminati510 wrote: Wont happen, they decided to go to Dvd early ( Feb 1 ) and make more profit with that then just rerelease it on the big screen. There is a high likelyhood of Ray being announced as Best Picture contendor. Didn't Lost in Translation get a pretty big re-release like 2 weeks before its DVD... and didn't it make a decent amount too?
Considering the Oscar nominations are announced January 25, the studio behind Ray would have time to make a decision to postpone the video release if it scored some nominations. And, yes, I think Lost in Translation did make some post-Oscarnom money.
|
Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:58 am |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
Easy answer.
Ray's superpowers suck.
|
Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:21 pm |
|
|