Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 6:28 pm



Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
 The Wall-E Prediction Thread. 
Author Message
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post The Wall-E Prediction Thread.
Why not start now?

I really don't think Ratatouille is going to affect how this is perceived.

The opening should be a general Pixar opening: $70 mil. There is no way it doesn't open with at least $60 mil, but I do think it will be tough to get anything above $75 mil, even with inflation.

Now, the legs. From what we've heard so far, it's going to be one of the most amazing animated films of all time. I do think a 4 multiplier is guaranteed, even if it's only a decent movie. Which would amount to a minimum of $280 mil. But if it's as good as we think it's going to be, then a 5 multiplier is definitely in play.

So, as my prediction stands now:

Opening Weekend: $75,200,000
Second Weekend: $52,600,000 (-30%)

Total: $391,040,000

Multiplier: 5.2

Take your time :happy:

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Mon May 28, 2007 1:17 am
Profile
Stanley Cup
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
Post Re: The Wall-E Prediction Thread.
Megatron wrote:
Why not start now?

I really don't think Ratatouille is going to affect how this is perceived.

The opening should be a general Pixar opening: $70 mil. There is no way it doesn't open with at least $60 mil, but I do think it will be tough to get anything above $75 mil, even with inflation.

Now, the legs. From what we've heard so far, it's going to be one of the most amazing animated films of all time. I do think a 4 multiplier is guaranteed, even if it's only a decent movie. Which would amount to a minimum of $280 mil. But if it's as good as we think it's going to be, then a 5 multiplier is definitely in play.

So, as my prediction stands now:

Opening Weekend: $75,200,000
Second Weekend: $52,600,000 (-30%)

Total: $391,040,000

Multiplier: 5.2

Take your time :happy:


:rofl:


Mon May 28, 2007 1:18 am
Profile
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22190
Location: Places
Post 
prediction=not. a. lot.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Mon May 28, 2007 1:45 am
Profile
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post 
What's the plot for this?


Mon May 28, 2007 1:45 am
Profile
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 3217
Post Re: The Wall-E Prediction Thread.
Megatron wrote:
Why not start now?

I really don't think Ratatouille is going to affect how this is perceived.

The opening should be a general Pixar opening: $70 mil. There is no way it doesn't open with at least $60 mil, but I do think it will be tough to get anything above $75 mil, even with inflation.

Now, the legs. From what we've heard so far, it's going to be one of the most amazing animated films of all time. I do think a 4 multiplier is guaranteed, even if it's only a decent movie. Which would amount to a minimum of $280 mil. But if it's as good as we think it's going to be, then a 5 multiplier is definitely in play.

So, as my prediction stands now:

Opening Weekend: $75,200,000
Second Weekend: $52,600,000 (-30%)

Total: $391,040,000

Multiplier: 5.2

Take your time :happy:



The assumption being that Ratatouille will somehow hurt Wall-E? Either way, I doubt there will be a runoff effect. It'll be a new year and a totally different movie. It'll gross $250-$300m. I'm too lazy to look at the competition during the surrounding weeks...

_________________
I believe in God as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.

I was blind, but now I see.


Mon May 28, 2007 10:38 am
Profile
Vagina Qwertyuiop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
Post 
It'll be the most critically acclaimed Pixar movie... but also the least successful.

$50m/$160m


Mon May 28, 2007 11:24 am
Profile
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post 
Snrub wrote:
It'll be the most critically acclaimed Pixar movie... but also the least successful.

$50m/$160m


Why?


Mon May 28, 2007 11:25 am
Profile
Jordan Mugen-Honda
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13403
Post 
Joe wrote:
Snrub wrote:
It'll be the most critically acclaimed Pixar movie... but also the least successful.

$50m/$160m


Why?


Because World War 3 will break out in the middle of its 3rd week.

_________________
Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message


Mon May 28, 2007 11:26 am
Profile
Stanley Cup
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
Post 
Joe wrote:
Snrub wrote:
It'll be the most critically acclaimed Pixar movie... but also the least successful.

$50m/$160m


Why?


because its so different and wont have the same mass appeal.


Mon May 28, 2007 12:00 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post 
Some don't realize that Pixar is guaranteed to open above $60 mil. It's not even a question

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Mon May 28, 2007 12:28 pm
Profile
Vagina Qwertyuiop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
Post 
Jayhawk wrote:
Joe wrote:
Snrub wrote:
It'll be the most critically acclaimed Pixar movie... but also the least successful.

$50m/$160m


Why?


because its so different and wont have the same mass appeal.


That's my feeling. It's difficult to say without having seen any of it yet, but the plot description sounds a little bit too out there to catch on with mass audiences.


Mon May 28, 2007 12:29 pm
Profile
Baaaaa!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 10:31 am
Posts: 1011
Location: Lookin for mah bukkit
Post 
Right now, I'm getting the feeling that this will be an absolutely amazing film, but mainstream audiences won't latch onto it and it will severly underperform. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess $110 million total.

_________________
Image


Mon May 28, 2007 12:37 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post 
arsibaba wrote:
Wall E will be the greatest animated flick ever made in the history of man

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Mon May 28, 2007 1:25 pm
Profile
Star Trek XI
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 2:40 pm
Posts: 331
Post 
There's no talking animals. In fact there's not much talking at all. The Pixar name will help, but it won't get this to 250m.


Mon May 28, 2007 1:59 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post 
$60/240 is guaranteed.

There is no question about it.

Since it's opening in the summer, a 4 multiplier is guaranteed.

If it's better than Nemo, then a 5 multiplier will be likely.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Mon May 28, 2007 2:09 pm
Profile
The Antichrist
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:04 am
Posts: 1742
Location: Calisota
Post 
Megatron wrote:
Some don't realize that Pixar is guaranteed to open above $60 mil. It's not even a question

Ratatouille could easily fall under that mark. And Cars' OW was just 100K above 60M. Last year people even said that Cars would have reached 500M WW, just because it was a Pixar movie.

_________________
Image


Mon May 28, 2007 3:11 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
Cant wait to see how this turns out, it could really be something special.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Mon May 28, 2007 3:27 pm
Profile
Vagina Qwertyuiop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
Post 
Omni wrote:
Megatron wrote:
Some don't realize that Pixar is guaranteed to open above $60 mil. It's not even a question

Ratatouille could easily fall under that mark. And Cars' OW was just 100K above 60M. Last year people even said that Cars would have reached 500M WW, just because it was a Pixar movie.


Cars had the goodwill of 6 stellar films beforehand to bump up its OW gross. I remember saying at the time I didn't think it would come close to previous Pixar films because the subject matter (Cars) wasn't as universal as toys, fish, monsters and superheroes. I failed to take into account just how trusted the Pixar brand had become. But it still disappointed, both critically and at the box office (especially overseas).

I don't think it's done much to tarnish the Pixar brand, and Ratatouille looks like a return to form, so it should perform well. But I can't help but think Wall-E is another Cars waiting to happen - only on a larger scale. A post-apocalyptic world with silent robots? How many seven-year-old girls can you imagine begging their parents to take them to see that?


Mon May 28, 2007 3:36 pm
Profile
Baaaaa!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 10:31 am
Posts: 1011
Location: Lookin for mah bukkit
Post 
I still don't get how Cars disappointed people. Quality-wise it is easily one of Pixar's best (with the exception of The Incredibles and maybe Toy Story).

_________________
Image


Mon May 28, 2007 3:56 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post 
Cars disappointed because because it's a movie we've seen a hundred times beforehand, only this time it's CGI.


Mon May 28, 2007 3:58 pm
Profile
Vagina Qwertyuiop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
Post 
That is also true. Watching the trailer I remember thinking "that looks an awful lot like Doc Hollywood". Actually watching the film made me think the makers of Doc Hollywood should sue.


Mon May 28, 2007 4:03 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
Pixar was always about taking a basic idea and adding their touch of originiality and imagination, they missed that boat with Cars.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Mon May 28, 2007 4:10 pm
Profile
Baaaaa!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 10:31 am
Posts: 1011
Location: Lookin for mah bukkit
Post 
I think a lot of the reason why Cars struck a chord with me lies in the fact that my town is a lot like the one in the movie. That just kind of made it appeal to me more and allowed me to overlook some of the unoriginality (although originality is not something I always require of films, as long as they're good).

_________________
Image


Mon May 28, 2007 4:14 pm
Profile
Vagina Qwertyuiop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
Post 
El Pollo Loco wrote:
Pixar was always about taking a basic idea and adding their touch of originiality and imagination, they missed that boat with Cars.


Exactly. I'm sure there are films with similar themes to Toy Story, Monsters, Inc., and Finding Nemo. Hell, even films with similar plots. But Cars was so similar to Doc Hollywood in particular that it may as well have been labelled a remake.


Mon May 28, 2007 4:17 pm
Profile
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 23317
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post 
Well Cars was a success - it had a 4.1 multiplier so WOM was definitely on the good side.

As for WALL-E - can we really tell until we see a trailer? Even if it is critically acclaimed - doesnt mean it will be huge at the box office. Look at the Iron Giant (I know its not Pixar but still).

I'd say at this stage the standard - $50-60m opening, $180-$220m finish.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Mon May 28, 2007 8:09 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 71 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.