Author |
Message |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 The Wall-E Prediction Thread.
Why not start now?
I really don't think Ratatouille is going to affect how this is perceived.
The opening should be a general Pixar opening: $70 mil. There is no way it doesn't open with at least $60 mil, but I do think it will be tough to get anything above $75 mil, even with inflation.
Now, the legs. From what we've heard so far, it's going to be one of the most amazing animated films of all time. I do think a 4 multiplier is guaranteed, even if it's only a decent movie. Which would amount to a minimum of $280 mil. But if it's as good as we think it's going to be, then a 5 multiplier is definitely in play.
So, as my prediction stands now:
Opening Weekend: $75,200,000
Second Weekend: $52,600,000 (-30%)
Total: $391,040,000
Multiplier: 5.2
Take your time 
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Mon May 28, 2007 1:17 am |
|
 |
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
|
 Re: The Wall-E Prediction Thread.
Megatron wrote: Why not start now? I really don't think Ratatouille is going to affect how this is perceived. The opening should be a general Pixar opening: $70 mil. There is no way it doesn't open with at least $60 mil, but I do think it will be tough to get anything above $75 mil, even with inflation. Now, the legs. From what we've heard so far, it's going to be one of the most amazing animated films of all time. I do think a 4 multiplier is guaranteed, even if it's only a decent movie. Which would amount to a minimum of $280 mil. But if it's as good as we think it's going to be, then a 5 multiplier is definitely in play. So, as my prediction stands now: Opening Weekend: $75,200,000 Second Weekend: $52,600,000 (-30%) Total: $391,040,000 Multiplier: 5.2 Take your time 

|
Mon May 28, 2007 1:18 am |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22190 Location: Places
|
prediction=not. a. lot.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Mon May 28, 2007 1:45 am |
|
 |
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm Posts: 19747
|
What's the plot for this?
|
Mon May 28, 2007 1:45 am |
|
 |
lilmac
Veteran
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 12:07 am Posts: 3217
|
 Re: The Wall-E Prediction Thread.
Megatron wrote: Why not start now? I really don't think Ratatouille is going to affect how this is perceived. The opening should be a general Pixar opening: $70 mil. There is no way it doesn't open with at least $60 mil, but I do think it will be tough to get anything above $75 mil, even with inflation. Now, the legs. From what we've heard so far, it's going to be one of the most amazing animated films of all time. I do think a 4 multiplier is guaranteed, even if it's only a decent movie. Which would amount to a minimum of $280 mil. But if it's as good as we think it's going to be, then a 5 multiplier is definitely in play. So, as my prediction stands now: Opening Weekend: $75,200,000 Second Weekend: $52,600,000 (-30%) Total: $391,040,000 Multiplier: 5.2 Take your time 
The assumption being that Ratatouille will somehow hurt Wall-E? Either way, I doubt there will be a runoff effect. It'll be a new year and a totally different movie. It'll gross $250-$300m. I'm too lazy to look at the competition during the surrounding weeks...
_________________ I believe in God as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.
I was blind, but now I see.
|
Mon May 28, 2007 10:38 am |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
It'll be the most critically acclaimed Pixar movie... but also the least successful.
$50m/$160m
|
Mon May 28, 2007 11:24 am |
|
 |
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm Posts: 19747
|
Snrub wrote: It'll be the most critically acclaimed Pixar movie... but also the least successful.
$50m/$160m
Why?
|
Mon May 28, 2007 11:25 am |
|
 |
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am Posts: 13403
|
Joe wrote: Snrub wrote: It'll be the most critically acclaimed Pixar movie... but also the least successful.
$50m/$160m Why?
Because World War 3 will break out in the middle of its 3rd week.
_________________ Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
Mon May 28, 2007 11:26 am |
|
 |
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
|
Joe wrote: Snrub wrote: It'll be the most critically acclaimed Pixar movie... but also the least successful.
$50m/$160m Why?
because its so different and wont have the same mass appeal.
|
Mon May 28, 2007 12:00 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Some don't realize that Pixar is guaranteed to open above $60 mil. It's not even a question
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Mon May 28, 2007 12:28 pm |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
Jayhawk wrote: Joe wrote: Snrub wrote: It'll be the most critically acclaimed Pixar movie... but also the least successful.
$50m/$160m Why? because its so different and wont have the same mass appeal.
That's my feeling. It's difficult to say without having seen any of it yet, but the plot description sounds a little bit too out there to catch on with mass audiences.
|
Mon May 28, 2007 12:29 pm |
|
 |
Quint
Baaaaa!
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 10:31 am Posts: 1011 Location: Lookin for mah bukkit
|
Right now, I'm getting the feeling that this will be an absolutely amazing film, but mainstream audiences won't latch onto it and it will severly underperform. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess $110 million total.
_________________
|
Mon May 28, 2007 12:37 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
arsibaba wrote: Wall E will be the greatest animated flick ever made in the history of man
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Mon May 28, 2007 1:25 pm |
|
 |
The Steeeve
Star Trek XI
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 2:40 pm Posts: 331
|
There's no talking animals. In fact there's not much talking at all. The Pixar name will help, but it won't get this to 250m.
|
Mon May 28, 2007 1:59 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
$60/240 is guaranteed.
There is no question about it.
Since it's opening in the summer, a 4 multiplier is guaranteed.
If it's better than Nemo, then a 5 multiplier will be likely.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Mon May 28, 2007 2:09 pm |
|
 |
Omni
The Antichrist
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:04 am Posts: 1742 Location: Calisota
|
Megatron wrote: Some don't realize that Pixar is guaranteed to open above $60 mil. It's not even a question
Ratatouille could easily fall under that mark. And Cars' OW was just 100K above 60M. Last year people even said that Cars would have reached 500M WW, just because it was a Pixar movie.
_________________
|
Mon May 28, 2007 3:11 pm |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
Cant wait to see how this turns out, it could really be something special.
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Mon May 28, 2007 3:27 pm |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
Omni wrote: Megatron wrote: Some don't realize that Pixar is guaranteed to open above $60 mil. It's not even a question Ratatouille could easily fall under that mark. And Cars' OW was just 100K above 60M. Last year people even said that Cars would have reached 500M WW, just because it was a Pixar movie.
Cars had the goodwill of 6 stellar films beforehand to bump up its OW gross. I remember saying at the time I didn't think it would come close to previous Pixar films because the subject matter (Cars) wasn't as universal as toys, fish, monsters and superheroes. I failed to take into account just how trusted the Pixar brand had become. But it still disappointed, both critically and at the box office (especially overseas).
I don't think it's done much to tarnish the Pixar brand, and Ratatouille looks like a return to form, so it should perform well. But I can't help but think Wall-E is another Cars waiting to happen - only on a larger scale. A post-apocalyptic world with silent robots? How many seven-year-old girls can you imagine begging their parents to take them to see that?
|
Mon May 28, 2007 3:36 pm |
|
 |
Quint
Baaaaa!
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 10:31 am Posts: 1011 Location: Lookin for mah bukkit
|
I still don't get how Cars disappointed people. Quality-wise it is easily one of Pixar's best (with the exception of The Incredibles and maybe Toy Story).
_________________
|
Mon May 28, 2007 3:56 pm |
|
 |
The Dark Shape
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am Posts: 12119 Location: Adrift in L.A.
|
Cars disappointed because because it's a movie we've seen a hundred times beforehand, only this time it's CGI.
|
Mon May 28, 2007 3:58 pm |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
That is also true. Watching the trailer I remember thinking "that looks an awful lot like Doc Hollywood". Actually watching the film made me think the makers of Doc Hollywood should sue.
|
Mon May 28, 2007 4:03 pm |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
Pixar was always about taking a basic idea and adding their touch of originiality and imagination, they missed that boat with Cars.
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Mon May 28, 2007 4:10 pm |
|
 |
Quint
Baaaaa!
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 10:31 am Posts: 1011 Location: Lookin for mah bukkit
|
I think a lot of the reason why Cars struck a chord with me lies in the fact that my town is a lot like the one in the movie. That just kind of made it appeal to me more and allowed me to overlook some of the unoriginality (although originality is not something I always require of films, as long as they're good).
_________________
|
Mon May 28, 2007 4:14 pm |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
El Pollo Loco wrote: Pixar was always about taking a basic idea and adding their touch of originiality and imagination, they missed that boat with Cars.
Exactly. I'm sure there are films with similar themes to Toy Story, Monsters, Inc., and Finding Nemo. Hell, even films with similar plots. But Cars was so similar to Doc Hollywood in particular that it may as well have been labelled a remake.
|
Mon May 28, 2007 4:17 pm |
|
 |
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am Posts: 23317 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
Well Cars was a success - it had a 4.1 multiplier so WOM was definitely on the good side.
As for WALL-E - can we really tell until we see a trailer? Even if it is critically acclaimed - doesnt mean it will be huge at the box office. Look at the Iron Giant (I know its not Pixar but still).
I'd say at this stage the standard - $50-60m opening, $180-$220m finish.
_________________
What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934
|
Mon May 28, 2007 8:09 pm |
|
|