Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 3:19 pm



Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
 Nearly Half of British People Have Never Heard of Auschwitz 
Author Message
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15553
Location: Everywhere
Post 
andaroo wrote:
The world is full of facts, and full of names...

...what is important is the act, and not the names. It's rather selfish that we expect people to remember all this useless trivia when most of you couldn't really tell in what countries, around this world, right now, people are dying of mass geonocide and the like.


That's the really sad thing. War could be breaking out again in the Ivory Coast, thousands could get killed in Sudan, a war between several countries could be fought in Congo (Africa's so called "first world war") and yet the media would hardly let you know about it. In fact there was almost nothing in the media about the Taliban until after September 11th. On September 10th 2001 I bet that no more then 3% of Americans could have told you who the Taliban were. :roll:


Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:14 am
Profile ICQ
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15553
Location: Everywhere
Post 
box_2005 wrote:
dolcevita wrote:

Thanks. I knew you were either Coptic or Orthodox, and had moved around alot, but couldn't narrow it down beyond that. I guess I was off on both guesses. :oops:

So its an interesting scenario...asking me how I feel about Holocaust discussions, as in compared to how you feel about what is going on today? Do you identify with it differently at all?



I'm neither Coptic nor Orthodox, hehe. Eh, Assyrian Church, that's its name.

It's a pretty old tradition. We're more or less the last remainders of those old Babylonians and Summerians and Arameans and Assyrians and etc. Of course, they all disappeared by intermixing with others, so no clear line anywhere.


I read a bit about it before. Isn't there an Assyrian language?


Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:57 am
Profile ICQ
Wall-E
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:47 pm
Posts: 863
Post 
Unfortunately, most people are eventually indoctrinated into the cult of numb acceptance and will eventually be brainwashed by the state into tolerating anything. American soldiers torture and kill prisoners every day. Eventually, it will become so commonplace that it will occur on an increasingly larger scale, until it potentially rivals some of the abuses of the Nazis, or Stalin's thugs. Amazingly, some Israelis (of all people) turn a blind eye to the slaughter of 100,000 innocent Iraqis because they couldn't possibly care less. In fact, some may even sanction the use of genocide against the enemies of Israel.

_________________
(selah)


Sun Dec 05, 2004 2:46 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
DP07 wrote:

I read a bit about it before. Isn't there an Assyrian language?



Ya, but it's officially called Syriac-Chaldean or Aramaic or something like that.


It's the modern dialect of the Aramaic spoken in Palestine and the Middle East in general during Jesus' time.


Sun Dec 05, 2004 3:02 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
wertham wrote:
Unfortunately, most people are eventually indoctrinated into the cult of numb acceptance and will eventually be brainwashed by the state into tolerating anything. American soldiers torture and kill prisoners every day. Eventually, it will become so commonplace that it will occur on an increasingly larger scale, until it potentially rivals some of the abuses of the Nazis, or Stalin's thugs. Amazingly, some Israelis (of all people) turn a blind eye to the slaughter of 100,000 innocent Iraqis because they couldn't possibly care less. In fact, some may even sanction the use of genocide against the enemies of Israel.



You can find people like that in every country and culture. Simply because someone belongs to a certain group doesn't mean they all act or react the same to different situations.

There were people in the Nazi party or those who collaborated who you could group as relatively 'good' people. Schindler is probably the most famous example, but there were others (those all in all, a surprising and disturbing rarity). And in turn, there were Jews and other prisoners who helped the Nazis in order to save their own skin (though of course they too were gotten rid of as soon as they were deemed useless).

The point here isn't whether people accept this or not; the survey did not asl whether people accepted what happened in Auschwitz. It asked whether they knew what Auschwitz was. They're not blindly accepting anything, they are just blind. I'm not saying that ignorance is an excuse, it's not; I think it is actually a form of evil in of itself, though much different from someone knowing what Auschwitz refers to and accepting it.


Sun Dec 05, 2004 3:10 pm
Profile WWW
Wall-E
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:47 pm
Posts: 863
Post 
box_2005 wrote:
The point here isn't whether people accept this or not; the survey did not asl whether people accepted what happened in Auschwitz. It asked whether they knew what Auschwitz was.


Oh, I totally got that. It's just that MOST people fervently desire to be led by the nose by authority figures, and they would prefer to see people FORGET about the atrocities of WW II. (Don't even ASK about Dresden, as it was totally covered up... as no one wanted to create any sympathy for the Germans. They were the monsters, and the creators of US propaganda wanted everyone to believe it. Then, within a generation, they were our friends again, and so were the Japanese.

Americans have a limited sense of history. (They don't call them "The UNITED STATES of AMNESIA for nothing.) Americans remember what the media WANTS them to remember. Most of these sheep will never pick up another history book the moment the graduate from high school (or even college) because they prefer to graze in a state of comfortable numbness.

BTW: The true number to remember from the the camps is 12 million... but who speaks for the exterminated Gypsies, Commies and Gays?

_________________
(selah)


Sun Dec 05, 2004 3:22 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
wertham wrote:
BTW: The true number to remember from the the camps is 12 million... but who speaks for the exterminated Gypsies, Commies and Gays?



Well, 7-11m, but depending on how broad the definition is. I think the most specific would be 7m killed in concentration camps, 6m Jews, 1m others, but other actrocities were committed during the onslaught on Central and Eastern Europe, etc. you're right.


I agree about Americans being ignorant on a slew of issues, and not attention being paid to a lot of others as well. The Rape of Nanking, for example. How do you kill 300,000 people and end up with such a good image as Japan? The atrocities committed by them during WW2 rivsl that of the Nazis. Check out some of the gruesome images (or don't); I honestly wouldn;t be able to tell the difference between those and the ones in Europe.

But this is a general feature of many cultures and ages; the ignorance always disturbs me, and it always seems to be present.


Sun Dec 05, 2004 3:26 pm
Profile WWW
Wall-E
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:47 pm
Posts: 863
Post 
box_2005 wrote:
But this is a general feature of many cultures and ages; the ignorance always disturbs me, and it always seems to be present.


Of course. And one of the favourite quotes of conspiracy theorists reads as follows:

Quote:
"The dream of every leader, whether a tyrannical despot or a
benign prophet, is to regulate the behavior of his people."
-- Colin Blakemore ("Mechanics of the Mind")


Everything you "see" now is media manipulation. The recent "war" (=turkey shoot) in Iraq is a perfect example. Is it any wonder that so many Brits have forgotten about the camps. They've WILLED themselves into a state of oblivion, because they know that they're all expendable passengers on a runaway train... and they'd rather NOT know anything about the sleazy SOB at the throttle.

If we could turn back the clock to the 1930s, then look at the things that the USA is doing in the world, we'd regard them with the same contempt we once reserved for the Nazis. It's only a matter of time before the GOP nutcases seize power, and these are the same RW conservative sociopaths that led Germany to its ruination. These Republicans will eventually destroy the US as well, and most of the sheep instinctively sense it. But what the hell can they do now? And what the hell could the German people do about the camps in 1941? Not a god-damn thing.

_________________
(selah)


Sun Dec 05, 2004 4:04 pm
Profile WWW
2.71828183

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm
Posts: 7827
Location: please delete me
Post 
box_2005 wrote:
Most people don't know this, but Auschwitz wasn't the most feared camp. Mauthausen was:

http://www.remember.org/camps/mauthausen/

They did not make as extensive use of gassing because there were so many other ways to kill prisoners. The emphasis in the camp was in killing you in the most painful way possible. This goddamn camp gave me three straight weeks of nghtmares when I was young; I lived in Vienna, so less than 2 hours from it. The camp incidentally contained all kinds of prisoners. One of the key point to the Holocaust is that everyone was or would eventually be a victim. If there were none left, victims would have been invented, somehow (say, brown haired people, etc.)

Btw, recent documents just a few months ago revelaed that Mauthausen was groomed to be the next Auschwitz.


I mean, really:

http://www.remember.org/camps/mauthause ... table.html

http://www.remember.org/camps/mauthausen/mau-gas02.html

http://www.remember.org/camps/mauthause ... tairs.html

And REALLY:

http://www.remember.org/camps/mauthausen/mau-mcd.html

Tasteless.


You know no matter how many times I see this, it still makes me physiclly ill. We have a Holocaust museum very clsoe to me and several local Holocaust surviviors give talks about what they went through. I've listend to them all several times, and its never gets any easeier to hear them talk.


Sun Dec 05, 2004 4:12 pm
Profile
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15553
Location: Everywhere
Post 
box_2005 wrote:
DP07 wrote:

I read a bit about it before. Isn't there an Assyrian language?



Ya, but it's officially called Syriac-Chaldean or Aramaic or something like that.


It's the modern dialect of the Aramaic spoken in Palestine and the Middle East in general during Jesus' time.


Yeah, I figured it would be a semetic language. I actually used to know quite a bit of Aramaic, however, I'm not sure I remember much of it anymore. It's been almost 4 years since I got out of the Yeshiva (Jewish-religious high school). But there we would learn the Talmud in Aramaic every day.


Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:50 am
Profile ICQ
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.