Author |
Message |
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11015 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
THE END :xena:
_________________
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:30 am |
|
|
RAWSAW
Wall-E
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 3:15 am Posts: 810 Location: Somewhere
|
The Dark Shape wrote: Yeah, that's why I don't hold too much stock in adjusted numbers. They're fun, but if tickets cost $7 a pop back in '77, not nearly as many people would be running to the movie theaters.
You cant think of it like that. That 7 bucks is the same to me as maybe the 2 dollars was to my father back in '77'. Thats why its an adjusted number. When you saw a movie back in the seventies you either went to the theater to view it or waited YEARS for it to come on TV. Now you know that within 2-6months you can just get it on dvd or pay for view. So a good part of that movie going public just waits. Or they wont see a movie 20 times at the theater, they wait to see it at home on their big screen tv.......
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 6:18 am |
|
|
baumer72
Mod Team Leader
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm Posts: 7087 Location: Crystal Lake
|
I'm not going to comment on Algren's SW rant, but just saffice to say that SW was the second massive film to come along and the first massive series of films. Nothing can touch that.
_________________ Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.
Last edited by baumer72 on Wed Jul 27, 2005 7:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 6:40 am |
|
|
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am Posts: 22697 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
An interesting note:
Here are the original trilogy's adjusted grosses without the 1997 re-releases:
New Hope $695m
Empire $407m
Jedi $453m
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 7:03 am |
|
|
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
Perhaps to be really fair, we could just list/discuss the # of tickets sold - forget those inflation-clad $$$...
(Is there a source for # of tickets sold?)
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:01 am |
|
|
baumer72
Mod Team Leader
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm Posts: 7087 Location: Crystal Lake
|
bradley witherberry wrote: Perhaps to be really fair, we could just list/discuss the # of tickets sold - forget those inflation-clad $$$...
(Is there a source for # of tickets sold?)
Saddest thing is, Hollywood keeps that a secret.
_________________ Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:06 am |
|
|
Nazgul9
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm Posts: 11289 Location: Germany
|
bradley witherberry wrote: Perhaps to be really fair, we could just list/discuss the # of tickets sold - forget those inflation-clad $$$...
Tickets sold isn't fair either towards newer releases because movies which came out a few decades ago didn't have to compete with a whole bunch of alternative entertainment options and DVD's on top of everything.
_________________
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:29 am |
|
|
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11015 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
Lets just face it, I am sorry LOTR fans, I love your series, my third fav (behind SW OT, and of course James Bond) but SW is just more popular than LOTR, when SW was released look how many publicity stunts happened, how many spoofs happened, and how the public was completely in love with SW, that never happened with LOTR, in fact back in the sixties more people were obssessed with Bond because look at all of the spy spin-offs of Bond back in those times. I am not trying to put down LOTR, but SW is more loved by the general public, now LOTR is probably more liked in Europe, Austrailia, and Asia (besides Japan), but here in the US, and in Japan, SW is the number one most beloved series of all time.
_________________
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:29 pm |
|
|
Nazgul9
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm Posts: 11289 Location: Germany
|
Darth Indiana Bond wrote: I am not trying to put down LOTR, but SW is more loved by the general public, now LOTR is probably more liked in Europe, Austrailia, and Asia (besides Japan), but here in the US, and in Japan, SW is the number one most beloved series of all time.
Again, talking out of your ass and broad generalizations without facts to back them up...
_________________
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:55 pm |
|
|
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11015 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
Nazgul9 wrote: Darth Indiana Bond wrote: I am not trying to put down LOTR, but SW is more loved by the general public, now LOTR is probably more liked in Europe, Austrailia, and Asia (besides Japan), but here in the US, and in Japan, SW is the number one most beloved series of all time. Again, talking out of your ass and broad generalizations without facts to back them up...
Now look at you, you are a friggin LOTR/PJ fanatic, I on the other like Bond more than SW, by a lot, and I am saying SW is more popular.
How many spin-offs or spoofs of LOTR do you see?? Very few, in fact hardly any.
_________________
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:50 pm |
|
|
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 10915
|
Gone with the wind is the highest grossing film adjusted is it not?
I doubt any film will beat the numbers of tickets sold for that film.
And SW isnt the most beloved series in japan,That honor goes to Harry Potter where all 3 films have outgrossed all of star wars films.
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:54 pm |
|
|
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11015 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
They did
Oh well \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/
Damn Wizard boy
_________________
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:58 pm |
|
|
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11015 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
doiuble post
_________________
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:58 pm |
|
|
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11015 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
doublep psot
_________________
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:58 pm |
|
|
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11015 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
double post
_________________
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:58 pm |
|
|
Nazgul9
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm Posts: 11289 Location: Germany
|
Darth Indiana Bond wrote: Now look at you, you are a friggin LOTR/PJ fanatic Cheap argument. Darth Indiana Bond wrote: How many spin-offs or spoofs of LOTR do you see?? Very few, in fact hardly any.
How many there are for SW? I've seen quite a few allusions to LOTR and characters from it finding mention on TV though, if that means anything...
Look, i'm not claiming what's more popular or beloved between the two franchises (unlike you), what i'm saying is that such things are hard to gauge and it's not as clear cut as some of you might believe it is.
_________________
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 2:31 pm |
|
|
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11015 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
To honest you are ind of correct, the only LOTR spin-off I have sen is on South Park, but they do SW spin-offs left and right.
To be honest again, we won't really know who is more popular until 20 years from now, and see if LOTR is still being talked about.
_________________
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 2:36 pm |
|
|
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 10915
|
LOTR has been talked about for over 50 years,i think in 20 years it will still be talked about.
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 2:45 pm |
|
|
The Dark Shape
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am Posts: 12119 Location: Adrift in L.A.
|
Darth Indiana Bond wrote: To honest you are ind of correct, the only LOTR spin-off I have sen is on South Park, but they do SW spin-offs left and right.
To be honest again, we won't really know who is more popular until 20 years from now, and see if LOTR is still being talked about.
That's not a spin-off, it's a spoof.
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:01 pm |
|
|
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11015 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
The Dark Shape wrote: Darth Indiana Bond wrote: To honest you are ind of correct, the only LOTR spin-off I have sen is on South Park, but they do SW spin-offs left and right.
To be honest again, we won't really know who is more popular until 20 years from now, and see if LOTR is still being talked about. That's not a spin-off, it's a spoof.
That is what I ment
_________________
|
Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:19 pm |
|
|