Raving Christian shoots up a Planned Parenthood. Are we going to bar them from getting guns? Can we kick them out of the country?

No, you see christians were here first, except when they weren't. But of course the natives weren't able to keep them out of their lands in that case.

Wouldn't you prefer to put someone like that in jail?

Or are you advocating that we send raving Christians to other countries with their guns to murder people there?

Fucking racist. I guess you want them to #Christiansplain there. Why don't you check your fucking privilege and stop wanting to violate #SafeSpaces in poor countries.

If it doesn't matter what is written on a piece of paper why does the concept of "first" matter? What relevance to a coherent philosophical system or for determining property rights, which you have, no doubt, is that?

Please elaborate--and if you don't use a ton of jargon, I will be mightily annoyed. Mightily.

I was being facetious. The 'first' matters simply because the christians have the power to keep others out.

Although I'm guessing you were too. In which case, you're mocking me in response to a facetious post, which is a different context. But whatever.

You really have no clue how to troll.

Why don't you mansplain to someone that cares.

What you do is completely say something insane that is almost impossible to respond to. And then you think that's "winning".

Oh look another mass shooting. I am shocked.

Culling the Americans, from within.

One of the California-shooting suspects' names has been released: Sayeed Farook.

Measures to restrict gun ownership could reduce gun accessibility and much of impulsive gun violence that arises from that.

Yeah, but i.hope, you forgot that IT'S AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION!!!!! This is still important to dumb Americans for some reason.

There hasn't been an organized jihadi attack in North America since Boston if I remember correctly. The timing after Paris would seem a strange coincidence.

Luckily these terrorists weren't very smart. They failed in their attempt at mass casualties and I don't think they accomplished anything other than just being another shooting episode.

Do please shut up. I get that you are playing a character, but it just seems forced.

The Constitution is simply an expression for the Rule of Law, something that many think is the greatest gift the English bestowed upon the world.

Your argument is like saying "'murder is illegal' is just some dumb thing people say for some reason." I suppose if I broke into your home and stole from you, you would report it to the local police because you think I violated some local law in China and you think that law should be enforced? If the police said "fuck you!" I guess you would consider that legit?

What about the shooting at the military facilities in Tennessee over the summer? Was it not "organized"?

The point I was making is that the US constitution is outdated. The right to bear arms and all of that shit is not needed these days. Hasn't been needed for 100 years or more.

He worked for the organization that was having the party. I still suspect he had some beef with them. He either did it because he was mad at them or he is a lone wolf. I am sure he planned it but this isn't isis or anything. The target isn't big enough, I mean it is a holiday party and they didn't even try to go after another target.

The right to bear arms is idiotic. It was created because we didn't have a powerful military and the british were being assholes.

We now have a powerful military. We don't need civilians to be a "well regulated militia" that the right refuses to regulate.

You don't want a gun fine. Run away. Hide. Call 911. Do all that. Go under your desk.

Now for the other segment of the population that cares about the 2nd Amendment. It is their RIGHT. It's just as relevant as the rights to speech, press and blah blah. Just get over it. It will never be reversed in this country. Maybe after you and I are dead and all the illegals can vote but that's not happening for another 100+ years so you whining about it is just tiresome and boring.

Why was it needed 100 years ago and not today?

The Constitution has an Amendment process (same way the Second Amendment was added...). If people really want it removed, our elected officials and states should use the Amendment process and remove it. Note that for all the whining, nobody ever proposes that or tries to do jack besides stupid hashtags memes.

I am sure that is it, professor. I doubt it is ISIS but he may be sympathetic. He randomly had bombs and tactical gear and had no intent to use them until some holiday party set him and his wife (?) off.

"why were records needed 30 years ago and not now"

"why was myspace needed 10 years ago and not now"