In Sanford,FL that would be a fact 99.99% of the time sadly

First jury vote was split 3-3. I guess the jury got caught up in the media spin

Um. No Chip. They went over the evidence and realized the prosecution failed. Why is that so hard for you people to get...enough already.

So after hearing all of the trial firsthand, three of the jurors thought he was guilty. After seeing all of the evidence and having it presented to them, they thought he was guilty.

Jurors don't hear news from the media.

6 Indecisive Ladies

It seems that they understood the facts of the case better than you.

Yes I agree with that. I am just pointing out things to posters who are commenting with nonsense talk.

So they know the case better than anyone here. Yet three of them still thought he was guilty.

Interesting.

on Day 1, Not on Day 2, after they reviewed the evidence.

Keep Up Please as that is a Clown Question Bro!

Yeah that proves your point. But it is better than hearing you talk.

This is why we don't get many new members. Because they're usually like you and annoying as hell.

Also, you can't use an image twice like your clown one. It might've been funny the first time, but now not so much.

Chippy, are you sure it isn't because of the quality of posts by the long term members here?

Well, as the other one was posted in another forum section, I wanted to show this forum section that, as it is funny as hell. And Spot on!

Most don't get it. Also, I didn't ask a question. Also, you SAID it, and then posted a picture with the exact same statement.

Fail.

Ok Chippy, I don't want to put down or fight with one of KJ's most honored and respected members, especially if this thread. So I won't comment on that anymore but I think all but you got it, Bro.

Anyways...

The jury let him go because they were all middle aged white women who don't understand that Zimmerman following Trayvon was racial profiling. One of them even said "his heart was in the right place" which is basically saying that anybody has the right to feel threatened by a young black man simply because he is black. It was a racist crime and him walking free is racist.

This case reflects wider social issues which is that black people are assumed to be dangerous and criminal and are never given the benefit of the doubt while white or white-passing individuals are, and are assumed to be righteous by default. And letting him go basically makes it legal for anyone to murder a black person in Florida because they were threatened by them simply because they were black.

So you really think he slammed his head against the pavement and was beating him to a pulp, and then Zimmerman went to the police station with no lasting or serious injuries being perfectly fine a couple hours later?

And did Trayvon not have a right to defend himself from somebody FOLLOWING HIM AROUND WITH A GUN? Why doesn't the Stand Your Ground law apply to Trayvon? Why didn't he have a right to defend himself? Didn't he have WAY more reason to fear for his life?

A black woman was just sentenced to 20 years in prison for firing a warning shot trying to escape from her abusive husband. Nobody was injured, nothing was harmed. But she's going to spend the next 20 years in prison. Black people are third class citizens in the US.

Incorrect. Zimmerman started the confrontation by FOLLOWING TRAYVON AT NIGHT WITH A GUN.

There is PLENTY of evidence that shows Zimmerman acted with malice including:

- Saying a racial slur on the phone directed at Trayvon while talking to the police

- Having previously reported numerous "suspicious" black people in his neighbourhood which shows he is a racist wannabe vigilante

- Having been thrown out of university due to be a danger to the campus which shows he is violent and reckless


I'm treating Zimmerman like black people get treated. No benefit of the doubt.