Author |
Message |
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
Algren wrote: He'll go down for it.
Isn't that what he's being charged for doing?
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com

|
Tue Feb 01, 2005 11:21 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
Mike Ventrella wrote: Algren wrote: He'll go down for it. Isn't that what he's being charged for doing?
touche
|
Tue Feb 01, 2005 11:22 pm |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
Mike Ventrella wrote: Algren wrote: He'll go down for it. Isn't that what he's being charged for doing?
[-(
|
Tue Feb 01, 2005 11:23 pm |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Do you guys actually think he's guilty or not? 
I think he's Guilty, but at the same time, there gonna treat this trial like the OJ Trial and he'll get off for being a Celebrity or his Race.. However, if for some reason unknown to God he were to be found Guilty and had to do time in Prison?? Then 1 of 2 things will happen: He'll either flee to Europe like Roman Polanski did for doing basically rhe same thing OR you'll read about his Body being found from Suicide cause no way would this guy(or girl) would survive prison because inmates in prison don't go for this Pedophile shit and he's be as good as dead and made their Bitch before being done in.. As for OJ?? I still to this day think he was Guilty as a Motherfucker and he only got off because the Jury was comprised of mostly Minority who were angry at the system and how they've been treated over the years and it was there way of getting even with the system by allowing him to walk.. Anyone that says otherwise is fooling themselves and are in complete DENIAL of the fact... There was just too much Goddamn evidence against OJ for him to walk like he did and I'll tell ya something else: Your not found "Not Guilty" in a Criminal Trial and found "Guilty" in a Civil Trial like he was which was a farce.. That there showed that the system was fucked up..
_________________http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this
|
Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:27 am |
|
 |
TonyMontana
Undisputed WoKJ DVD King
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:55 am Posts: 16278 Location: Counting the 360 ways I love my Xbox
|
BKB_The_Man wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Do you guys actually think he's guilty or not?  I think he's Guilty, but at the same time, there gonna treat this trial like the OJ Trial and he'll get off for being a Celebrity or his Race.. However, if for some reason unknown to God he were to be found Guilty and had to do time in Prison?? Then 1 of 2 things will happen: He'll either flee to Europe like Roman Polanski did for doing basically rhe same thing OR you'll read about his Body being found from Suicide cause no way would this guy(or girl) would survive prison because inmates in prison don't go for this Pedophile shit and he's be as good as dead and made their Bitch before being done in.. As for OJ?? I still to this day think he was Guilty as a Motherfucker and he only got off because the Jury was comprised of mostly Minority who were angry at the system and how they've been treated over the years and it was there way of getting even with the system by allowing him to walk.. Anyone that says otherwise is fooling themselves and are in complete DENIAL of the fact... There was just too much Goddamn evidence against OJ for him to walk like he did and I'll tell ya something else: Your not found "Not Guilty" in a Criminal Trial and found "Guilty" in a Civil Trial like he was which was a farce.. That there showed that the system was fucked up..
Michael Jackson will get off because of his race? White people can't play the race card!
Anyhow, I think this is a lot different than the OJ trial. Michale looks freaky to put it mildly, and this would play against him in a child molestation case. It's easy to believe the allegations just by his look alone.
_________________
|
Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:36 am |
|
 |
Ahmed Johnson
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:22 pm Posts: 2226 Location: Pearl River, Mississippi
|
Mike Ventrella wrote: Algren wrote: He'll go down for it. Isn't that what he's being charged for doing?
conduct unbecoming of a lawyer
MINUS 50 CREDIBILITY POINTS!
_________________
|
Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:26 pm |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
TonyMontana wrote: Anyhow, I think this is a lot different than the OJ trial. Michale looks freaky to put it mildly, and this would play against him in a child molestation case. It's easy to believe the allegations just by his look alone.
Steve Buscemi looks pretty freaky. Does that make him a child molester? Would it be easy to believe he is one just by his look alone?
|
Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:45 pm |
|
 |
TonyMontana
Undisputed WoKJ DVD King
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:55 am Posts: 16278 Location: Counting the 360 ways I love my Xbox
|
Snrub wrote: TonyMontana wrote: Anyhow, I think this is a lot different than the OJ trial. Michale looks freaky to put it mildly, and this would play against him in a child molestation case. It's easy to believe the allegations just by his look alone. Steve Buscemi looks pretty freaky. Does that make him a child molester? Would it be easy to believe he is one just by his look alone?
Yes.
Come to think about it, mimes look like child molesters too!
_________________
|
Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:49 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
TonyMontana wrote: bABA wrote: You know .. your first 2 points don't bother me at all.
Wasn't he married once .. no .. twice?
Yes, the last one is disturbing. The first point wouldn't raise your eyebrow at all? The fact that a middle aged man *only* has meaningful relationships with pre-pubescent boys? I realize you say in your country it was customary for everybody to sleep in the same bed, but I'm willing to bet the adult males you're referring to have meaningful relationships outside pre-pubescent boys. They don't exclude everyone from their bed, but the boys. Jackson was "married" to Lisa Marie Presley. The marriage was widely speculated to be a sham - more for publicity. He adopted a child that he reports is his, but I saw the kid on a documentary, and he's snow white. I seriously doubt Jackson is the father - even in a sperm donor type of way. I feel for the kid. Who knows what he's doing to him? I guess it'd be like if I could adopt a Supermodel. 
Wasn't it Woody Allen who married a girl he adopted before?
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:51 pm |
|
 |
TonyMontana
Undisputed WoKJ DVD King
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:55 am Posts: 16278 Location: Counting the 360 ways I love my Xbox
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: TonyMontana wrote: bABA wrote: You know .. your first 2 points don't bother me at all.
Wasn't he married once .. no .. twice?
Yes, the last one is disturbing. The first point wouldn't raise your eyebrow at all? The fact that a middle aged man *only* has meaningful relationships with pre-pubescent boys? I realize you say in your country it was customary for everybody to sleep in the same bed, but I'm willing to bet the adult males you're referring to have meaningful relationships outside pre-pubescent boys. They don't exclude everyone from their bed, but the boys. Jackson was "married" to Lisa Marie Presley. The marriage was widely speculated to be a sham - more for publicity. He adopted a child that he reports is his, but I saw the kid on a documentary, and he's snow white. I seriously doubt Jackson is the father - even in a sperm donor type of way. I feel for the kid. Who knows what he's doing to him? I guess it'd be like if I could adopt a Supermodel.  Wasn't it Woody Allen who married a girl he adopted before?
Yep. It somehow seems wrong to use an adoption service as a dating service.
I wonder if the wife would object to me adopting Kate Beckinsale? Hmmm....
_________________
|
Wed Feb 02, 2005 7:34 pm |
|
|