| Author |
Message |
|
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
|
 I want to be in a couple! I want to jump on the bandwagon! Any volunteers? Everyone except for zennier (  ) may apply.  _________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
| Fri Mar 07, 2008 4:55 pm |
 
|
|
|
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
|
Re: I want to be in a couple! Be careful what you wish for...
|
| Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:17 pm |
|
|
|
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13403
|
Re: I want to be in a couple! Box + Bradley = Boxley. Its the perfect match!
_________________
Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
| Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:19 pm |
|
|
|
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
|
Re: I want to be in a couple! Gulli wrote: Box + Bradley = Boxley. Its the perfect match! I only fly solo and I advise Box to do the same...  (Besides, it'd have to be Bradox!)
|
| Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:23 pm |
|
|
|
jujubee
Forum General
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 11:45 pm
Posts: 6447
|
Re: I want to be in a couple! Gulli wrote: Box + Bradley = Boxley. Its the perfect match! Box + Gulli = Bullocks!
_________________
......
|
| Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:30 pm |
|
|
|
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13403
|
Re: I want to be in a couple! jujubee wrote: Gulli wrote: Box + Bradley = Boxley. Its the perfect match! Box + Gulli = Bullocks! Urge to kill Jules RISING!!
_________________
Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
| Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:32 pm |
|
|
|
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm
Posts: 10316
Location: berkeley
|
Re: I want to be in a couple! as if i'd apply.
|
| Fri Mar 07, 2008 6:26 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: I want to be in a couple! SUBMITS!!!  _________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm |
|
|
|
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40513
|
Re: I want to be in a couple! Ugly brown inanimate objects unite!  +  _________________Shackâs top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
| Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:03 pm |
|
|
|
Magic Mike
Wallflower
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am
Posts: 35239
Location: Minnesota
|
Re: I want to be in a couple! I want to be in a couple too. Though a lot of people in couples don't want to be in them, so if we were in couples eventually we'd just want out  .
|
| Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:16 pm |
|
|
|
Korrgan
problem?
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:52 am
Posts: 15515
Location: Bait Shop
|
Re: I want to be in a couple! Shack wrote: Ugly brown inanimate objects unite! +  I lol'ed._________________
|
| Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:28 pm |
|
|
