How about if he starts wearing women's dresses?

lol fine. you got me there. =D>

Yeah

UNEARNT PRIVLEGE IS SO KICKASS!!!!!

I bet Dr. Lecter made him wear it...

Prince Harrys like the less refined, more irritating and generally dimmer version of Prince William.

Plus, dosent it seem wierd that Prince of Wales has black hair and Diana has Blonde hair, yet Harry has ginger hair? Funnily enough...James Hewitt ALSO has ginger hair......

Man Diana was the only royal ive ever liked. She was like nice.

That's so silly.


Who said they hate him? We're saying he's an absolute moron, which he is.


There are two gay guys I know of who have posted in this thread, and both have expressed favourable opinions of him. WTF is wrong with you???

You don't defend someone when they commit such an astonishingly stupid act, no matter how much you'd like them to stick it up your ass. I hope you guys are joking, else it's just sick.

Gee?? Need I have to guess who the 2 Gay Guys are that defending this kid??? How many guesses do I have???

I'm with you in opposing that. They should put an end to it, it's archaic and has been for a long time.

I don't find royalty insulting at all. Infact i was one of the few people in my class back at school that took the "pro-royal" side when asked if the Royals should be abolished.

Why? The Royal Family don't cost the UK that much at all really, infact, they are pretty much self-sustaining. The Royals do give alot of people figureheads to look up to, and they also act as the social / diplomatic arm of the UK head of state. Its like, Tony Blair makes all the [bad] desicions, and the Royals go on pretty hectic schedules to keep ties between Britain and other nations strong.

They aren't intrusive people necessarily, and the charity money that the Royal family raises is significant to say the least.

So why not? Its not like they are making my life any worse? And they help alot of people across the UK.

yes!



THE ONE AHMED JOHNSON HAS SOME MIDDLE CLASS RELATIVES



And they too partook in the massacre of wild beasts


GETTING BLOOD SMEARED ON THEIR FACES ETC



Made ol' AJ respect them a lot less after that...

They sure fooled me with their antics over the last few centuries...

THE VERY IDEA

That they should be considered "superior"


BECAUSE THEY ARE DESIGNATED AS ROYALS


is so fucking insulting


Taxpayers fund their wildly expensive jaunts across the globe!


They cowardly murder innocent animals!


THEY HAVE SOME


"questionable" views on race and minorities




IN SHORT THEY DO NOT EARN THEIR PRIVLEGE AND THATS THE BOTTOM LINE CAUSE AHMED SAYS SO!!! =D>

=D>

=D> =D> =D>

In the news now, Charles is ordering Harry to go to Auschwitz. I don't know if it will help his image but I'm sure any pot dealers within a 50 mile radius of that historic spot are happy.

At this point the best argument for keeping the royals is they help the tourism business by making the country seem a bit old fashioned and drawing attention to its history and generally being famous and putting England in the news, though preferably not this way.

If the Royalty helps the tourism industry, then the tourism industry should be interested in sponsoring it. If it isn't, then there's no reason to keep them around.

I say give those leeches the boot.

Me too. Send 'em back to Germany!

Oh that brings up an interesting side aspect of the Harry thing, that this strain of royal blood isn't that old in England that they came over from Germany about 150 years ago. Put in that context, Harry's mistake seems even dumber.

[-X [-(


:wink:

I'm trying to think of how this could have happened logistically. I can't believe that Harry somehow acquired a Nazi Uniform without being noticed, put it on, transported himself to this party, and started having fun at this party -- and during all this time, not a SINGLE friend or family member or limo driver or publicist or passerby said to him, "Hey man, that's not right, take it off." This just sounds so...premeditated.

Don't all these royals have a fleet of chaperones and assistants to keep tabs on them to make sure they don't screw up? Especially someone like Harry, who's already had more negative press than is good for him. In a way, the royals do have a "job," which is to basically to look noble and not screw up. Harry is failing this job majorly. Why didn't Charles appoint Harry a babysitter? He certainly needs one.

My friend went to a halloween party in toronto as osama. He asked to kindly leave.

In counterstrike, I played terrorist and I changed my name to Osama. I was kindly asked to change the name or ELSE.

In pakistan, my friend dressed up as Osama for Halloween. He looked very convincing and people found it hilarious.

Case in point: People everywhere realize what symbols are for but people sometimes DO indeed do things as a joke and in some societies, some things just don't matter as much as another. In Pakistan, you better be careful if you dress up as a Jew (unless you're trying to be funny or making fun of them .. again, only in certain cases) ... other places, it won't matter at all.