Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Jul 09, 2025 6:31 pm



Reply to topic  [ 175 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 Dark Shape's/ Box's WOTW Experience (Filled With Spoilers) 
Author Message
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
well i loved signs so....


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:30 am
Profile
Award Winning Bastard

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
Post 
Box wrote:
The monumental failure was somewhat of a play on words.

The film is so close to being great, and just falls flat at the end, which makes it even worse. You know that there are professionals behind this film- some of the stuff is amazing- but man, they rushed it. Else, I can't understand how Spielberg could give us a film like this.


I hope it's not rushed, as this was one of my most anticipated movies, but I always worried that it might be the result after the late shooting start and the deadline to have it done for 4th of July. If everybody recalls, they jumped into that spot very late, and not a frame of film had been shot yet.


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:30 am
Profile
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm
Posts: 2303
Location: 905
Post 
Box wrote:
Jiffy208 wrote:
I have a feeling that this is Signs all over again.

You're closer to the truth than you would want to be.

Whew. Guess I'm the only one who didn't intensely hate the ending to Signs.
Still I am going to prepare myself with the fact that ending may be somewhat lacking.


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:30 am
Profile WWW
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
Box wrote:
The Dark Shape wrote:
It's not a monumental failure, but it has one of the worst endings I've ever seen.



The film is a monumental effort, and its ending (as well as some things throughout the film), render it a failure.

The monumental failure was somewhat of a play on words.

The film is so close to being great, and just falls flat at the end, which makes it even worse. You know that there are professionals behind this film- some of the stuff is amazing- but man, they rushed it. Else, I can't understand how Spielberg could give us a film like this.


Oh come on!! A movie that is close to being Great and an ending which turns the movie from great to a monumental disaster?? How about it's close to being great and the ending reduces it to merely good cause I don't buy that a movie can go from nearly great to a monumental disaster.. I don't buy that..

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A


This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this


Last edited by STEVE ROGERS on Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:31 am, edited 1 time in total.



Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:30 am
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 2:27 pm
Posts: 6152
Location: New York
Post 
I_Was_Your_Sam wrote:
Jiffy208 wrote:
I have a feeling that this is Signs all over again.


what was wrong with signs? it did make over $200million too..

you probably mean The Village :-k


Well, no, I really loved Signs, but a lot of people hated the ending with a passion - yet it was still a really big hit.


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:30 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post 
I think I actually liked the film a lot more than you did, Box. The money shots are awesome and I liked the characters. But the film drags down once Tim Robbins is introduced, and the ending is so god-awful it invalidates the whole thing.


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:31 am
Profile
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
BKB_The_Man wrote:

Some of the answers make no sense?? :???: Have you read the H.G Wells novel?? If so, it makes sense.. Reads the book and see it again and perhaps your opinion will change of it.. I can't believe that an ending would ruin an entire movie after the other 98% of it kicked ass.. This sounds like the movie HIGH TENSION where supposedly the movie is great, but the ending sucks which in tuirn could cause someone to hate the movie based on the ending..


I heard they changed alot of stuff from the book so it wouldnt of help if he read the HG novel


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:31 am
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 11032
Post 
El_Masked_esteROIDe_user wrote:
Signs and AI all over again


That makes me happy,i love those endings.
\:D/


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:32 am
Profile WWW
Confessing on a Dance Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am
Posts: 5578
Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
Post 
The Dark Shape wrote:
I think I actually liked the film a lot more than you did, Box. The money shots are awesome and I liked the characters. But the film drags down once Tim Robbins is introduced, and the ending is so god-awful it invalidates the whole thing.


Does it turn out to be that Tom Cruise is wacko and it's all in his head? oh wait, we're talking about the movie right?


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:32 am
Profile
Award Winning Bastard

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
Post 
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Oh come on!! A movie that is close to being Great and an ending which turns the movie from great to a monumental disaster?? How about it's close to being great and the ending reduces it to merely good cause I don't buy that a movie can go from nearly great to a monumental disaster.. I don't buy that..


Kinda like a movie getting a 9.5/10 grade one week and being shit all over the following week. :razz:


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:32 am
Profile
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
Maverikk wrote:
Box wrote:
The monumental failure was somewhat of a play on words.

The film is so close to being great, and just falls flat at the end, which makes it even worse. You know that there are professionals behind this film- some of the stuff is amazing- but man, they rushed it. Else, I can't understand how Spielberg could give us a film like this.


I hope it's not rushed, as this was one of my most anticipated movies, but I always worried that it might be the result after the late shooting start and the deadline to have it done for 4th of July. If everybody recalls, they jumped into that spot very late, and not a frame of film had been shot yet.


Mav, how can a movie be classified as quote 'Nearly Great" and all of a sudden an ending causes it to go from great to a monumental disaster??? Wouldn't it make more sense to say that it went from great to just good cause the ending didn't jive with the moviegoer?? Again, I think this sounds more like an overreaction than anything..

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A


This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:33 am
Profile WWW
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
Would the movie of been better if it had been 20 mins longer or more? Like you said Box, some questions were left unanswered


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:35 am
Profile
The French Dutch Boy
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm
Posts: 10266
Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
Post 
I don't trust box. Not in that I don't believe he truly he is disappointed, but his taste is wacky and he hates films that are loved by the rest, so really I take this as a good sign. I never expected box to actually like this film. Meanwhile, some reviewers are gushing over this film, so I'm fine.

PEACE, Mike ;)


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:35 am
Profile
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
Maverikk wrote:
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Oh come on!! A movie that is close to being Great and an ending which turns the movie from great to a monumental disaster?? How about it's close to being great and the ending reduces it to merely good cause I don't buy that a movie can go from nearly great to a monumental disaster.. I don't buy that..


Kinda like a movie getting a 9.5/10 grade one week and being #### all over the following week. :razz:


Kind of like you like everyne else didn't ####### read what I had said in that I gave BATMAN BEGINS A Goddamn 9.5 out of 10 when comparing it to the last 2 BATMAN Movies which were horrible.. Why is that so damn hard to accept??? Why??? You can give a movie a good grade and still have flaws in it Guy..

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A


This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:35 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post 
You know what, I'm going to flat-out say the ending so everyone knows where we're coming from. Read it if you want to or wait till Wednesday, but 90% of you will agree with us.

MAJOR SPOILERS










Really









Still here?

Okay. The aliens' giant mech weapons suddenly stop working. Tom Cruise makes it to Boston and finds one has just crashed into a building without being attacked. He also finds the shields on one have stopped working, the military is able to destroy it, etc. He makes it home with his daughter, finds out his son is alright (despite the fact the valley where he left him was incinerated three seconds after he turned away). Yippee. We get a wide shot of every single alien vehicle down, and all the invaders dead.

Then Morgan Freeman gives a us a nice voiceover that explains that the aliens couldn't survive for long on our planet due to atmospheric conditions. The end.










END MAJOR SPOILERS


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:36 am
Profile
Award Winning Bastard

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
Post 
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Kind of like you like everyne else didn't ####### read what I had said in that I gave BATMAN BEGINS A Goddamn 9.5 out of 10 when comparing it to the last 2 BATMAN Movies which were horrible.. Why is that so damn hard to accept??? Why??? You can give a movie a good grade and still have flaws in it Guy..


BKB, calm down, huh? I was clearly teasing you and mocking those that have given you a hard time over that.


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:38 am
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 11032
Post 
The Dark Shape wrote:
You know what, I'm going to flat-out say the ending so everyone knows where we're coming from. Read it if you want to or wait till Wednesday, but 90% of you will agree with us.

MAJOR SPOILERS










Really









Still here?

Okay. The aliens' giant mech weapons suddenly stop working. Tom Cruise makes it to Boston and finds one has just crashed into a building without being attacked. He also finds the shields on one have stopped working, the military is able to destroy it, etc. He makes it home with his daughter, finds out his son is alright (despite the fact the valley where he left him was incinerated three seconds after he turned away). Yippee. We get a wide shot of every single alien vehicle down, and all the invaders dead.

Then Morgan Freeman gives a us a nice voiceover that explains that the aliens couldn't survive for long on our planet due to atmospheric conditions. The end.










END MAJOR SPOILERS


Not much diffrent from the book.


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:38 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
The Dark Shape wrote:
I think I actually liked the film a lot more than you did, Box. The money shots are awesome and I liked the characters. But the film drags down once Tim Robbins is introduced, and the ending is so god-awful it invalidates the whole thing.



Dark Shape, I think your opinion might be closer to that of the general public than mine might be. I felt that there were some awkward moments from the very beginning, but the ending, oh man. This is one of those things that is simply preposterous. It simply doesn't make sense. If one is to look back and reassess everything, it just doesn't add up.

With Signs, the emotional core of the film was so strong that the end didn't really matter; the film was about Gibson and his family all along, and it came across convingly. WOTW tries to do the exact same thing, but there is no resolution of the kind that Signs had.

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:39 am
Profile WWW
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
Maverikk wrote:
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Kind of like you like everyne else didn't ####### read what I had said in that I gave BATMAN BEGINS A Goddamn 9.5 out of 10 when comparing it to the last 2 BATMAN Movies which were horrible.. Why is that so damn hard to accept??? Why??? You can give a movie a good grade and still have flaws in it Guy..


BKB, calm down, huh? I was clearly teasing you and mocking those that have given you a hard time over that.


Ok.. Deep breath.. :wink:

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A


This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:40 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
El_Masked_esteROIDe_user wrote:
Would the movie of been better if it had been 20 mins longer or more? Like you said Box, some questions were left unanswered



No. The whole script needs reworking. If someone doesn't actually see that there are flaws from the very beginning, then I'm positive they are being selective, concentrating on the action, and ignoring much else.

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Last edited by Box on Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:42 am, edited 1 time in total.



Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:41 am
Profile WWW
Award Winning Bastard

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
Post 
Spoilers...


OMG...that is a terrible ending. I hope you're joking. That's worse than Signs. These intergalactic explorers who are much more advanced than we are didn't gauge the atmosphere before they decided to make this their new home? It like the Signs aliens who didn't realize that water was harmful to them before they invaded a planet that has 75% water and moisture in the air that sometimes causes water to pour from the sky.


Last edited by Maverikk on Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:44 am, edited 2 times in total.



Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:41 am
Profile
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
The Dark Shape wrote:
You know what, I'm going to flat-out say the ending so everyone knows where we're coming from. Read it if you want to or wait till Wednesday, but 90% of you will agree with us.

MAJOR SPOILERS










Really









Still here?

Okay. The aliens' giant mech weapons suddenly stop working. Tom Cruise makes it to Boston and finds one has just crashed into a building without being attacked. He also finds the shields on one have stopped working, the military is able to destroy it, etc. He makes it home with his daughter, finds out his son is alright (despite the fact the valley where he left him was incinerated three seconds after he turned away). Yippee. We get a wide shot of every single alien vehicle down, and all the invaders dead.

Then Morgan Freeman gives a us a nice voiceover that explains that the aliens couldn't survive for long on our planet due to atmospheric conditions. The end.










END MAJOR SPOILERS


Alright.. So what was so bad about this??? I think it's certainly more plausible than the ending to SIGNS where the Aliens come to our planet knowing that most of our planet consists of water which there afraid of.. Sounds like this movie is pretty spot on with the 1957 H.G Wells classic of the same title.. It sounds like this movie is being more sold on the action portion of it than logic, in which case, we could make this same argument about the ALIENS in AVP which came to our planet for a Rite of passage and both species survived at the end when they came out of that chasm on the ice..

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A


This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this


Last edited by STEVE ROGERS on Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:46 am, edited 1 time in total.



Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:43 am
Profile WWW
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm
Posts: 2303
Location: 905
Post 
I'm still waiting for the super ridiculous part of the ending where it would cause me to loathe the film, because the one that The Dark Shape posted, isn't doing it for me.

I find the Computer Virus and Crop Duster ending to ID4 more laughable than this one. But then again I found nothing universally wrong with the ending to Signs or Contact, so I'm pretty sure I'm in the minority with that one.

It's like the ending to a few episodes of ST: Voyager, or The Outer Limits. C'mon Wednesday.


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:43 am
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
The Dark Shape! You bastard! :mad:

I'm so tempted to read your spoiler. :razz:


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:44 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
Maverikk wrote:
Spoilers...


OMG...that is a terrible ending. I hope you're joking. That's worst than Signs. These intergalatatic explorerors who are much more advanced than we are didn't gauge the atmosphere before they decided to make this their new home? It like the Signs aliens who didn't realize that water was harmful to them before they invaded a planet that has 75% water and moisture in the air that sometimes causes water to pour from the sky.



Oh yes, oh yes.

Spoiler

They've been planning this bloody thing for 1 million years, and not once did these aliens, who are technologically superior in every way, consider the possibility that the bacteria might do them harm. Not once? How can these aliens be so hyper-intelligent and so stupid at the same time?



/Spoiler

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:44 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 175 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.