Author |
Message |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68355
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
I started watching Turbo the other day. It's a pretty generic film.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:38 pm |
|
 |
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm Posts: 21571 Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
Not rotten tomatoes but I think 78 for Zootopia is a little low. Deserves the mid 80's.
|
Thu Nov 17, 2016 12:45 pm |
|
 |
_axiom
The Wall
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am Posts: 16163 Location: Croatia
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
zwackerm wrote: Not rotten tomatoes but I think 78 for Zootopia is a little low. Deserves the mid 80's. I'd say it's a 60-70 movie.
|
Thu Nov 17, 2016 12:54 pm |
|
 |
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm Posts: 21571 Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
_axiom wrote: zwackerm wrote: Not rotten tomatoes but I think 78 for Zootopia is a little low. Deserves the mid 80's. I'd say it's a 60-70 movie. It has an 8.1 average score on RT. Don't they usually correlate? It seemed to me that Zootopia was nearly as well received as Inside Out
|
Thu Nov 17, 2016 1:42 pm |
|
 |
_axiom
The Wall
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am Posts: 16163 Location: Croatia
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
No. They don't correlate. You have 85-100 movies with under 7.0 average score. RT sucks. How many times do we have to say that.
|
Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:00 pm |
|
 |
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
zwackerm wrote: Not rotten tomatoes but I think 78 for Zootopia is a little low. Deserves the mid 80's. I think its score of 98 on RT is deserved. 
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com

|
Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:09 pm |
|
 |
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm Posts: 21571 Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
_axiom wrote: No. They don't correlate. You have 85-100 movies with under 7.0 average score. RT sucks. How many times do we have to say that. I was referring to the average rating being close to the meta score. But I still think you're in the minority on your Zootopia rating.
|
Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:49 pm |
|
 |
_axiom
The Wall
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am Posts: 16163 Location: Croatia
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
Wait, we're talking Metacritic now? I was talking only RT % vs RT average score.
|
Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:50 pm |
|
 |
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm Posts: 21571 Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
I never mentioned RT overall score. I believe Rotten Tomatoes is accurate usually. There are some exceptions (MCU films).
|
Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:53 pm |
|
 |
Barrabás
llegó a la casa vía marítima
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm Posts: 6327 Location: la gran casa de la esquina
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
Zootopia is SJW'd and boring. It deserved a score in the 50s.
_________________ .
|
Mon Nov 21, 2016 12:19 am |
|
 |
tree and a half
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:38 am Posts: 2084
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
The shamefully under-appreciated Not Another Teen Movie's 29% RT score isn't really inexplicable - after all, RT has no respect for comedy, especially spoofs - but where else are you going to see Captain America dating Supergirl's sister? 
|
Mon Nov 21, 2016 5:53 am |
|
 |
_axiom
The Wall
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am Posts: 16163 Location: Croatia
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
I would have hard time focusing on anything other than Chris Evans' butt in that movie to notice who he's dating.
|
Mon Nov 21, 2016 5:56 am |
|
 |
tree and a half
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:38 am Posts: 2084
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
_axiom wrote: I would have hard time focusing on anything other than Chris Evans' butt in that movie to notice who he's dating. Chyler Leigh's butt is equally admirable.
|
Mon Nov 21, 2016 6:03 am |
|
 |
stuffp
Keeping it Light
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 8:06 am Posts: 11636 Location: Bright Falls
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
A recent one: Passengers.
It's very well liked here on the board, but critics completely torched it. Why?
|
Tue Jan 17, 2017 1:39 am |
|
 |
tree and a half
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:38 am Posts: 2084
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
stuffp wrote: A recent one: Passengers.
It's very well liked here on the board, but critics completely torched it. Why? Social justice warriors posing as film reviewers gave low ratings to Passengers to try to discourage people from seeing it because of the movie's central ethical dilemna, rather than using it as a starting point for discussion. This article, Film Critics Are Lying To You, describes this covert action, and also this Reddit thread debates it.
|
Tue Jan 17, 2017 4:27 am |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68355
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
IT'S ALL A CONSPIRACY!
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Tue Jan 17, 2017 4:43 am |
|
 |
stuffp
Keeping it Light
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 8:06 am Posts: 11636 Location: Bright Falls
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
tree and a half wrote: stuffp wrote: A recent one: Passengers.
It's very well liked here on the board, but critics completely torched it. Why?
Social justice warriors posing as film reviewers gave low ratings to Passengers to try to discourage people from seeing it because of the movie's central ethical dilemna, rather than using it as a starting point for discussion. Thanks, it clarifies the unfair treatment it's mostly getting.
|
Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:18 am |
|
 |
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm Posts: 21571 Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
Passengers glorifies rape. EVIL movie!
|
Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:49 am |
|
 |
stuffp
Keeping it Light
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 8:06 am Posts: 11636 Location: Bright Falls
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
LOL, no it doesn't So, what would you do in Pratt's situation zwackerm?
|
Tue Jan 17, 2017 11:39 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
I haven't seen it, but blaming critics for its failure is so ridiculous. If people want to see a film, they'll see a film.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:02 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68355
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
zwackerm wrote: Passengers glorifies rape. 
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Tue Jan 17, 2017 6:40 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
zwackerm was trying to be sarcastic.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:23 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
stuffp wrote: LOL, no it doesn't So, what would you do in Pratt's situation zwackerm? Probably finally sit down and be like "yo, time to have sex with my hand".
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Tue Jan 17, 2017 8:14 pm |
|
 |
stuffp
Keeping it Light
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 8:06 am Posts: 11636 Location: Bright Falls
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
Haha...good one.
|
Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:01 am |
|
 |
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am Posts: 23367 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
 Re: Inexplicable Rotten Tomato Ratings
zwackerm wrote: Home Alone is fucking Rotten. I think it should at least be in the 70's like Mrs. Doubtfire
Indeed, Home Alone should not be rotten.
_________________
What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934
|
Wed Jan 18, 2017 9:42 pm |
|
|