Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Jul 10, 2025 5:36 pm



Reply to topic  [ 175 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
 Dark Shape's/ Box's WOTW Experience (Filled With Spoilers) 
Author Message
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
mansonmyers wrote:
matatonio!!!

You have THE best avatar ever....... woo yay.

quality.


YAY!! thank you! :D


Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:40 pm
Profile
Star Trek XI
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:04 pm
Posts: 349
Location: Miami, FL
Post 
Box, I can't wait to hear your thoughts.

I have a request. Please have a version of your review without spoilers. I don't want to be spoiled at all but would love to hear what others think of it.

_________________
Trust me.


Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:51 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Post 
You should make one brief review that brushes over everything ala AICN (just for spite).

Then another review that goes into any issues and spoiler areas.


Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:11 pm
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
I'm seeing it tomorrow night at 7:00 PM, can't wait. :)


Mon Jun 27, 2005 9:49 pm
Profile
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32619
Location: the last free city
Post 
so in about an hour we should hear from him...right. [-o<

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:00 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
No no no no


A monumental failure.


Details coming up.

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:03 am
Profile WWW
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
Box wrote:
No no no no


A monumental failure.


Details coming up.


Sarcasm or for real?? :???:


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:05 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
El_Masked_esteROIDe_user wrote:
Box wrote:
No no no no


A monumental failure.


Details coming up.


Sarcasm or for real?? :???:



Oh, it's for real alright.

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:05 am
Profile WWW
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
Box wrote:
Oh, it's for real alright.


Dang then thats what I fear the post when I heard som many rumors about the gag orders for the critics not to mention the less than perfect score at imdb. I thought all those were just fake and bogus but let me just read what you have said


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:08 am
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 11032
Post 
Box wrote:
No no no no


A monumental failure.


Details coming up.


Im not suprised that you didnt like it box.
:lol:


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:20 am
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
Yeah, I'm actually not surprised either. You've been saying how you thought it was going to be crap anyways. :razz:


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:23 am
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 2:27 pm
Posts: 6152
Location: New York
Post 
Yeah, color me not that shocked, hehe.


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:24 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post 
It's not a monumental failure, but it has one of the worst endings I've ever seen.


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:24 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
I am. I was skeptical about a lot of various aspects, but not about the quality of the film.


Roid, I've been extremely harsh on a lot of films, so I don't know if my opinion is that of the average filmgoer.

However, the screening I attended was a preview, and two men were standing outside asking people about their opinions. One of them went to the other and asked what the verdict was. He said it was so-so, but that he got quite a few negative ones.

Only one person (yes, one) applauded in the end. Most immediately started discussing the film, and let me tell you, they were not smiling. It might be because the film raises more questions than it answers. Actually, some of the answers given make no sense.

Anyways, let me just try to come up with something of a review.

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:24 am
Profile WWW
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
Me to considering most reviews I've read including CHUD and Harry Knowles say it's Spielberg's finest work in a long time and compare it to his film DUEL.. I guess AICN is down for the moment, but here is CHUD'S Review of it:

http://chud.com/reviews/3507

After reading this, I can't wait til Wednesday, but I think I'll wait til Friday to see it.. They say it's definitely true to the novel, ending and all..

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A


This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:25 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
The Dark Shape wrote:
It's not a monumental failure, but it has one of the worst endings I've ever seen.



The film is a monumental effort, and its ending (as well as some things throughout the film), render it a failure.

The monumental failure was somewhat of a play on words.

The film is so close to being great, and just falls flat at the end, which makes it even worse. You know that there are professionals behind this film- some of the stuff is amazing- but man, they rushed it. Else, I can't understand how Spielberg could give us a film like this.

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:26 am
Profile WWW
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
The Dark Shape wrote:
It's not a monumental failure, but it has one of the worst endings I've ever seen.

Anywhere in the top 5 of this year or seriously underwhelmed?


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:27 am
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 2:27 pm
Posts: 6152
Location: New York
Post 
I have a feeling that this is Signs all over again.


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:27 am
Profile
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
oooh nooooo!! matatonio dont read, DONT READ!!!!...... :cry: ....


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:27 am
Profile
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
Box wrote:
I am. I was skeptical about a lot of various aspects, but not about the quality of the film.


Roid, I've been extremely harsh on a lot of films, so I don't know if my opinion is that of the average filmgoer.

However, the screening I attended was a preview, and two men were standing outside asking people about their opinions. One of them went to the other and asked what the verdict was. He said it was so-so, but that he got quite a few negative ones.

Only one person (yes, one) applauded in the end. Most immediately started discussing the film, and let me tell you, they were not smiling. It might be because the film raises more questions than it answers. Actually, some of the answers given make no sense.

Anyways, let me just try to come up with something of a review.


Some of the answers make no sense?? :???: Have you read the H.G Wells novel?? If so, it makes sense.. Reads the book and see it again and perhaps your opinion will change of it.. I can't believe that an ending would ruin an entire movie after the other 98% of it kicked ass.. This sounds like the movie HIGH TENSION where supposedly the movie is great, but the ending sucks which in tuirn could cause someone to hate the movie based on the ending..

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A


This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:28 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
Jiffy208 wrote:
I have a feeling that this is Signs all over again.



You're closer to the truth than you would want to be.

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:28 am
Profile WWW
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
Signs and AI all over again


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:28 am
Profile
Confessing on a Dance Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am
Posts: 5578
Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
Post 
Jiffy208 wrote:
I have a feeling that this is Signs all over again.


what was wrong with signs? it did make over $200million too..

you probably mean The Village :-k


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:28 am
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
I_Was_Your_Sam wrote:
Jiffy208 wrote:
I have a feeling that this is Signs all over again.


what was wrong with signs? it did make over $200million too..

you probably mean The Village :-k


A lot of people actually hated the ending to Signs.


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:29 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Box wrote:
I am. I was skeptical about a lot of various aspects, but not about the quality of the film.


Roid, I've been extremely harsh on a lot of films, so I don't know if my opinion is that of the average filmgoer.

However, the screening I attended was a preview, and two men were standing outside asking people about their opinions. One of them went to the other and asked what the verdict was. He said it was so-so, but that he got quite a few negative ones.

Only one person (yes, one) applauded in the end. Most immediately started discussing the film, and let me tell you, they were not smiling. It might be because the film raises more questions than it answers. Actually, some of the answers given make no sense.

Anyways, let me just try to come up with something of a review.


Some of the answers make no sense?? :???: Have you read the H.G Wells novel?? If so, it makes sense.. Reads the book and see it again and perhaps your opinion will change of it.. I can't believe that an ending would ruin an entire movie after the other 98% of it kicked ass.. This sounds like the movie HIGH TENSION where supposedly the movie is great, but the ending sucks which in tuirn could cause someone to hate the movie based on the ending..


The ending is not the only thing wrong. And 98% did not kick ass.

But you have to understand that for afilm like this, the end is anticipated sincethe beginning. Much in the film depends on the ending.

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:29 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 175 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.