Author |
Message |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Right now, I am thinking:
Martin Scorcese
Clint Eastwood
Marc Foster
Alexander Payne
Pedro Almodovar/Alejandro Amenabar/Mike Nichols (neither of their movies will get a Best Pic nom)
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Mon Dec 13, 2004 12:24 pm |
|
|
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
Clint Eastwood, Million Dollar Baby
Mike Nichols, Closer
Alexander Payne, Sideways
Martin Scorsese, The Aviator
Then a surprise. Maybe something even crazy!
|
Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:56 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
andaroo wrote: Clint Eastwood, Million Dollar Baby Mike Nichols, Closer Alexander Payne, Sideways Martin Scorsese, The Aviator
Then a surprise. Maybe something even crazy!
Pitof?
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:56 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
DGA noms:
Taylor Hackford - Ray
Clint Eastwood - Million Dollar Baby
Alexander Payne - Sideways
Mark Foster - Finding Neverland
Martin Scorcese - The Aviator
I think that, all of them, but Hackford will be nominated for Best Director now. I expect to either Gondry or Nichols to grab the fifth spot.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Jan 06, 2005 2:39 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
My final predictions:
Martin Scorcese, The Aviator
Marc Foster, Finding Neverland
Clint Eastwood, Million Dollar Baby
Alexander Payne, Sideways
Zhang Yimou, House of Flying Daggers
The 5th spot will be between Yimou, Mann, Hackford and George.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:58 pm |
|
|
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
Question:
Do you think what Jamie Foxx said at the Globes represents the attitude of some Academy members? Meaning, is Hackford percieved as "bravely" taking a chance, telling and polishing a tale that was an African American's tale, with an African American cast?
We may see a 5/5 Picture/Director line up, and a 5/5 match with the DGA.
|
Wed Jan 19, 2005 11:37 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
No, I don't think so
Frankly, people are expecting too many matches this year. They are expecting:
A 5:5 Best Actor match with the SAG
A 5:5 Best Actress match with the SAG
A 5:5 Best Picture match with the DGA / 5:5 Best Director match with the DGA
A 5:5 Best Picture/Best Director match
That's a bit too many matches. Not impossible, no, but unlikely.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Jan 19, 2005 11:44 pm |
|
|
Raffiki
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am Posts: 9966
|
WOW. Taylor Hackford was a real surprise.
I think there may in fact be a 5:5 match for the first time in a while. I realize alot of others are matching more categories (I'm not).
I still think Hackford won't get in, but his chances are increasing greatly and so has Ray's.
_________________ Top Movies of 2009 1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man
Top Anticipated 2009 1. Nine
|
Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:51 am |
|
|
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Frankly, people are expecting too many matches this year. Even if you consider Hotel Rwanda/Ray a swing vote, that doesn't leave a lot of room for budging :? Quote: A 5:5 Best Actor match with the SAG I fully expect Giamatti to miss out on a nomination Quote: A 5:5 Best Actress match with the SAG Imelda Staunton and especially Catalina Sandino Moreno are great women in great films but not a sure bet. Quote: A 5:5 Best Picture match with the DGA / 5:5 Best Director match with the DGA 5:5 Best Picture match with the DGA happened last year in fact. And there is not a HUGE amount of director canidates that are viable anymore. I wouldn't even consider Yimou viable anymore. If there is a surprise at this year's Oscars though, it will most likely be here in Best Director. Quote: That's a bit too many matches. Not impossible, no, but unlikely.
If you said though, at the start of this year that not one of the Best Picture canidates would make more than $100 million at the box office I would have laughed in your face.
I just think it's a weird year.
Hackford himself, I think may have a more clear path to a nomination than Ray the film does. And, on paper, I still think Ray's chances are much, much greater than Rwanda's.
|
Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:06 am |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
So who do you expect to replace Paul Giamatti? The Best Actor category is the one that I think might really match 5:5...
Also, the thing with Moreno and Staunton is that there are not too many to replace them...
Oh and I think The Aviator will reach $100 million eventually.
PS: Hotel Rwanda will be nominated
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:12 am |
|
|
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: So who do you expect to replace Paul Giamatti? The Best Actor category is the one that I think might really match 5:5... Giamatti is the weak link... Eastwood still has a shot, as does Bardem. Bardem's chances really depend on how strong House of Flying Daggers is considered, and if House of Flying Daggers is considered the Best Foriegn Film winner. Quote: Also, the thing with Moreno and Staunton is that there are not too many to replace them... I think that argument can be made for the top four or five categories this year. If there is some weird Closer love lurking around you may still find Julia Roberts in the race. Delpy is not much of a weaker canidate than Moreno. Quote: Oh and I think The Aviator will reach $100 million eventually. Yeah but not before nominations (last week) which is what really counts. We all know the top 2 or so contendors to win in almost every category, it's just really finding out who's nominated on the fringes which holds any interest. Quote: PS: Hotel Rwanda will be nominated
Yeah, sure thing for actor, maybe writing and maybe supporting actress. =D> Alfie still ends up with more Oscar wins though... even if Rwanda is nominated for picture ](*,) #-o
|
Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:20 am |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
andaroo wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: So who do you expect to replace Paul Giamatti? The Best Actor category is the one that I think might really match 5:5... Giamatti is the weak link... Eastwood still has a shot, as does Bardem. Bardem's chances really depend on how strong House of Flying Daggers is considered, and if House of Flying Daggers is considered the Best Foriegn Film winner.
I really don't get why people think that Eastwood still has got a shot. I mean, really, I don't see any pre-cursor noms or awards for him
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:24 am |
|
|
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm Posts: 16054
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: andaroo wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: So who do you expect to replace Paul Giamatti? The Best Actor category is the one that I think might really match 5:5... Giamatti is the weak link... Eastwood still has a shot, as does Bardem. Bardem's chances really depend on how strong House of Flying Daggers is considered, and if House of Flying Daggers is considered the Best Foriegn Film winner. I really don't get why people think that Eastwood still has got a shot. I mean, really, I don't see any pre-cursor noms or awards for him
I agree with you. Eastwood will be a no-show come tuesday
|
Thu Jan 20, 2005 6:45 am |
|
|
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
There is almost always a performance which pops on the radar with no precurser wins or nominations (or almost no precursers). Last year it was Keisha Castle Hughes.
|
Thu Jan 20, 2005 11:05 am |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
andaroo wrote: There is almost always a performance which pops on the radar with no precurser wins or nominations (or almost no precursers). Last year it was Keisha Castle Hughes.
She had a Broadcast Film Critics Association, Chicago Film Critics Association and a SAG nom. That is by far and away more than Eastwood who hasn't got anything whatsoever so far.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Jan 20, 2005 11:17 am |
|
|
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: andaroo wrote: There is almost always a performance which pops on the radar with no precurser wins or nominations (or almost no precursers). Last year it was Keisha Castle Hughes. She had a Broadcast Film Critics Association, Chicago Film Critics Association and a SAG nom. That is by far and away more than Eastwood who hasn't got anything whatsoever so far.
Well he was just an example. Bardem is much more realistic. Point is that Giamatti is weak and it probably won't match up 5/5.
|
Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:58 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
andaroo wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: andaroo wrote: There is almost always a performance which pops on the radar with no precurser wins or nominations (or almost no precursers). Last year it was Keisha Castle Hughes. She had a Broadcast Film Critics Association, Chicago Film Critics Association and a SAG nom. That is by far and away more than Eastwood who hasn't got anything whatsoever so far. Well he was just an example. Bardem is much more realistic. Point is that Giamatti is weak and it probably won't match up 5/5.
But even Giamatti has received more noms than Bardem so far and has at least won a couple of awards.
Certainly, I hope you're right, but I just don't think you are.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:20 pm |
|
|
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
I think you and I have reached this mutual position where we can't sway each other anymore.
Thank god the noms are Tuesday
Are we doing IRC or chat or just messageboard? I have to get up at 5 am urgh
|
Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:26 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
What time is it exactly at?
I don't mind either of the chatting options, by the way. Hopefully, I won't be in school, though :???:
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:28 pm |
|
|
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: What time is it exactly at?
I don't mind either of the chatting options, by the way. Hopefully, I won't be in school, though :???:
It's 5:30AM PST, 8:30AM EST, and 2:30PM your time, I believe.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:34 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
xiayun wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: What time is it exactly at?
I don't mind either of the chatting options, by the way. Hopefully, I won't be in school, though :???: It's 5:30AM PST, 8:30AM EST, and 2:30PM your time, I believe.
That's right, thank you.
Man, I'm going to barely make it. I usually come home from school at around 2:15 PM, provided the bus is not too late (it usually isn't though). Last time, I arived home about 2 minutes before the announcement.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:40 pm |
|
|
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
What will you do if Ray is nominated?
What will I do if Hotel Rwanda is nominated?
THESE ARE BURNING QUESTIONS.
|
Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:49 pm |
|
|
Anonymous
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: xiayun wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: What time is it exactly at?
I don't mind either of the chatting options, by the way. Hopefully, I won't be in school, though :???: It's 5:30AM PST, 8:30AM EST, and 2:30PM your time, I believe. That's right, thank you. Man, I'm going to barely make it. I usually come home from school at around 2:15 PM, provided the bus is not too late (it usually isn't though). Last time, I arived home about 2 minutes before the announcement.
We'll need to keep the announcement threads to a minimum on Tuesday.
|
Fri Jan 21, 2005 12:50 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
andaroo wrote: What will you do if Ray is nominated?
What will I do if Hotel Rwanda is nominated?
THESE ARE BURNING QUESTIONS.
What will we do if both get nominated and Finding Neverland is snubbed?
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:37 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
OSCAR NOMINATIONS:
Martin Scorcese, The Aviator Taylor Hackford, Ray Clint Eastwood, Million Dollar Baby Alexander Payne, Sideways Mike Leigh, Vera Drake
Mike Leigh is the definite surprise here, I don't think anyone has predicted him. Hackford and Payne are pretty much out of the race. It'll be down to Scorcese and Eastwood, but something tells me that Scorcese will be snubbed yet again while The Aviator will be rewarded.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:55 pm |
|
|