Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 9:56 pm



Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
 Razzies Catwomen and Alexander lead noms! 
Author Message
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:29 pm
Posts: 6738
Location: Germany
Post 
andaroo wrote:
Loki With Tasty Legs wrote:
These Fahrenheit noms suck donkey dick.

Why are you upset with them? Judging by your avatar you think Bush is not a great guy.

Let me put it this way, they voted for Farenheit 9/11 because they actually support Farhenheit 9/11. They are saying that Bush, Rice and Spears are morons.


Lol, i took the pic because it was a funny gif. It could have been any other guy giving the finger.
I just think it's stupid to include people from a documentary. especially with this when it gets too political.
if they went with the documentary route they can fill up the whole category with random people from documentaries.
and besides.. people don't act in a documentary.. or they thought that would be the joke. so Hardy fuckin Har. not funny.

_________________
Chaa Chaa! Cromm laughs ad yoo foo winds!
My God is strongöööör.. he is the everlasting skyyyyyyy!!!
Your God lives underneath him!


Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:23 pm
Profile ICQ WWW
The French Dutch Boy
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm
Posts: 10266
Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
Post 
Rod wrote:
Uhhh, guys, I think the Fahrenheit 9/11 nominations are showing SUPPORT for the movie, rather than the opposite. :wink:


Yep, that's what I was thinking. They only nominated Bush and associates for acting awards to make fun of THEM, not the film itself.

Also, I am SOOOOOO glad The Village was not nominated for anything, must importantly film. This film does not deserve razzie nominations.

PEACE, Mike ;)


Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:25 pm
Profile
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
razzies. the one award i hate.

its not even like they try to sound legitimate. they pick movies and nominate them cause it would be sooo cool to nominate them due to a popular consensus. i can tell you, half the people who nominate this stuff ... havent even seen them


Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:58 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
Post 
Guys, it's the Razzies. They're just being silly, hence the Fahrenheit 9/11 nominations.


Mon Jan 24, 2005 6:06 pm
Profile WWW
Mr. and Mrs. Smith
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 7:21 pm
Posts: 457
Post 
bABA wrote:
razzies. the one award i hate.

its not even like they try to sound legitimate. they pick movies and nominate them cause it would be sooo cool to nominate them due to a popular consensus. i can tell you, half the people who nominate this stuff ... havent even seen them


Totally agree. Val Kilmer for Alexander? Angelina Jolie for Taking Lives? C'mon. Even the critics who hated these movies would say that their performances are pretty good, if not great.

_________________
Image
The Skeleton Key: Best Horror Thriller of the Year


Mon Jan 24, 2005 6:08 pm
Profile WWW
King Albert!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:04 pm
Posts: 11838
Location: The Happiest City on Earth
Post 
Why did Farenheit get all those nods. Since when do real interviews count as acting. Though at least somewhere, James Matriz is smiling.

But the one nod I truly like is: Hilary Duff. Good call.

_________________
Visit My Youtube Account and here is what you will see.
Image Image Image and many more.


Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:41 pm
Profile WWW
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
Its rather predictable as almost all razzie years are. I bet we already know whats going to be nominated next year. The only thing that was surprising of this years nomination was the omission of Whole 10 yards and razzie favorite Bruce Willis

Oh well, he will get it next year for Hostage and Sin City


Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:48 pm
Profile
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:07 pm
Posts: 1684
Post 
Stupid nominations, Ben Stiller got worst actor for almost all of his films last year. I think that he is funny, Anyways the Razzies suck, I know that their silly and all, but they are getting more stupid every year.


Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:57 pm
Profile WWW
Kiera Knightly is my lady!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 1:18 pm
Posts: 8773
Location: New Mexico
Post 
if the razzies went by the critics the noms would be:
Twisted
Yu-Gi-Oh
The Cookout
Godsend
Superbabies

(all had the lowest % on rt)

_________________
Isn't it ironic that Hollywood mocks Gibson for drunk driving yet praises Polanski who molested a child? Or praises Edward Kenedy who killed someone while drunk driving?


Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Profile WWW
Christian's #1 Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
Post 
I'm dissapointed with this years selection of films. The nominations for Fahrenheit 9/11 are simply absurd. As far as I know, George W. Bush and Condeleeza Rice did not consent to be in the film and they were merely interviews. Why the nominations? Besides the fact that it is Hollywood and Hollywood has an immense liberal slant? And George W. Bush's pet goat?

As far as the others, they seem to be just films that people like to bash just for the sake of bashing them. It is true that the awards have been declining recently, but this almost seems as if they "jumped the shark" so to speak.

_________________
See above.


Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:17 pm
Profile
Kiera Knightly is my lady!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 1:18 pm
Posts: 8773
Location: New Mexico
Post 
since when is a political speech acting?

_________________
Isn't it ironic that Hollywood mocks Gibson for drunk driving yet praises Polanski who molested a child? Or praises Edward Kenedy who killed someone while drunk driving?


Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:19 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
Post 
RogueCommander wrote:
I'm dissapointed with this years selection of films. The nominations for Fahrenheit 9/11 are simply absurd. As far as I know, George W. Bush and Condeleeza Rice did not consent to be in the film and they were merely interviews. Why the nominations? Besides the fact that it is Hollywood and Hollywood has an immense liberal slant? And George W. Bush's pet goat?

As far as the others, they seem to be just films that people like to bash just for the sake of bashing them. It is true that the awards have been declining recently, but this almost seems as if they "jumped the shark" so to speak.


I agree with that, but like I said, guys.

Really.

The Razzies are just silly. They're not meant to be taken seriously.


Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:58 pm
Profile WWW
Christian's #1 Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
Post 
Dkmuto wrote:
RogueCommander wrote:
I'm dissapointed with this years selection of films. The nominations for Fahrenheit 9/11 are simply absurd. As far as I know, George W. Bush and Condeleeza Rice did not consent to be in the film and they were merely interviews. Why the nominations? Besides the fact that it is Hollywood and Hollywood has an immense liberal slant? And George W. Bush's pet goat?

As far as the others, they seem to be just films that people like to bash just for the sake of bashing them. It is true that the awards have been declining recently, but this almost seems as if they "jumped the shark" so to speak.


I agree with that, but like I said, guys.

Really.

The Razzies are just silly. They're not meant to be taken seriously.


That is true. Hence the reason I sort of shrugged them off as nonsense.

_________________
See above.


Mon Jan 24, 2005 10:04 pm
Profile
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
bABA wrote:
razzies. the one award i hate.

its not even like they try to sound legitimate. they pick movies and nominate them cause it would be sooo cool to nominate them due to a popular consensus. i can tell you, half the people who nominate this stuff ... havent even seen them

Kinda like AMPAS ;)


Mon Jan 24, 2005 10:06 pm
Profile WWW
Angels & Demons
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 11:09 am
Posts: 271
Post 
Yeah! Alexander! lol!


Tue Jan 25, 2005 2:55 pm
Profile WWW
Angels & Demons
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 11:09 am
Posts: 271
Post 
Heres something from a anti-bush perspective, I think F9/11 nom was rather dumb, since its a political speech or something.
it could be against showing moores editing making bush look bad or for showing bush is bad.
its all a matter of perspective.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 2:56 pm
Profile WWW
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
Im surprised by their omission of Whole 10 Yards. I would of thought we would get worst supporting actor from Matthew Perry and actor from Bruce Willis. Oh well theres always worst actor for Willis in Sin City and hostage


Tue Jan 25, 2005 2:57 pm
Profile
Christian's #1 Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
Post 
Spider-man 2004 wrote:
Heres something from a anti-bush perspective, I think F9/11 nom was rather dumb, since its a political speech or something.
it could be against showing moores editing making bush look bad or for showing bush is bad.
its all a matter of perspective.


I just don't get why they even nominated him?

_________________
See above.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 3:00 pm
Profile
Angels & Demons
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 11:09 am
Posts: 271
Post 
RogueCommander wrote:
Spider-man 2004 wrote:
Heres something from a anti-bush perspective, I think F9/11 nom was rather dumb, since its a political speech or something.
it could be against showing moores editing making bush look bad or for showing bush is bad.
its all a matter of perspective.


I just don't get why they even nominated him?

Neither do I.
(I'm agreeing on something with you and impact on politics. scary.)


Tue Jan 25, 2005 3:01 pm
Profile WWW
Christian's #1 Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
Post 
Why do you say that? I'm not a Bush fan. I waiver back and forth occasionally. But I've never been a big fan of him.

_________________
See above.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 3:04 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm
Posts: 12096
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Post 
Dkmuto wrote:
Guys, it's the Razzies. They're just being silly, hence the Fahrenheit 9/11 nominations.


Heh! I was just about to write the same thing. The Razzies are just some guys making fun of the movies. It has no more clout or creedence than anything we might make up ourselves. Laugh at it or ignore it, it's not important.

_________________
Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com


Image


Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:05 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm
Posts: 12096
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Post 
Impact wrote:
since when is a political speech acting?


The idea is that Bush was supposed to be acting presidential, but he is absolutely terrible at it. Get it?

_________________
Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com


Image


Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:06 am
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
I wonder if Bush will show up if he wins. Maybe Moore will pick the trophy, give it to Bush and make a movie about it...


Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:49 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
I am still surprised that no "big movie" was nominated this year.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Thu Jan 27, 2005 10:25 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.