Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Jun 16, 2024 6:09 am



Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 Biggest Surprises at the Oscar nominations this year 
Author Message
Post 
Levy wrote:
Goldie wrote:
As I don't think this has been mentioned - was this expected.

WRITING (ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY)

THE AVIATOR
ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND
HOTEL RWANDA
THE INCREDIBLES
VERA DRAKE


sort of. Vera Drake is the bigger surprise in here...


Because all of Leigh's films are workshopped and improvised, its a strange nomination.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:31 am
King Albert!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:04 pm
Posts: 11838
Location: The Happiest City on Earth
Post 
The Score category is very strange. No Incredibles, what were they thinking?

I have a BIG question in the documentry feature category. Tupac: Ressurection was nonimated, but it was released in theaters November 2003, so why was it still eligible?

_________________
Visit My Youtube Account and here is what you will see.
Image Image Image and many more.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 12:02 pm
Profile WWW
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 3:51 pm
Posts: 1102
Location: The Bronx
Post 
The Village for best score was the biggest surprise to me. I absolutely adore that music and I never dreamed the Academy would look past the mixed critical/public reaction and recognize it. I'm just so bloody ecstatic about it.



On a side note, the lack of Flying Daggers in Foreign film was also a surprise that pissed me off just a tad. Can't really say that Eastwood was a surprise. Still kind of a waste of a nomination when the dude has no chance in hell of winning.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Profile WWW
Christian's #1 Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
Post 
Scott Vasquez wrote:
The Score category is very strange. No Incredibles, what were they thinking?

I have a BIG question in the documentry feature category. Tupac: Ressurection was nonimated, but it was released in theaters November 2003, so why was it still eligible?


It has been discussed multiple times in other threads. Documentary features must be theatrically released within two years of their completion and must be released theatrically between September 30th and August 31st to qualify for Academy Award nominations.

_________________
See above.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 3:35 pm
Profile
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 3:51 pm
Posts: 1102
Location: The Bronx
Post 
One more thing I must add...

I can't believe that both volumes of Kill Bill will have come and gone without a single oscar nomination (correct me if I'm wrong). At the very least it should have had nominations in the sound and cinematography categories, but the real kick in the ass is that the performance that was screaming out to be nominated (David Carradine) was snubbed in favour of another nod for Jamie Foxx who 1)doesn't belong in supporting and 2)does not even give the best performance in Collateral.


FUCK.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 3:50 pm
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
BennyBlanco wrote:
One more thing I must add...

I can't believe that both volumes of Kill Bill will have come and gone without a single oscar nomination (correct me if I'm wrong). At the very least it should have had nominations in the sound and cinematography categories, but the real kick in the ass is that the performance that was screaming out to be nominated (David Carradine) was snubbed in favour of another nod for Jamie Foxx who 1)doesn't belong in supporting and 2)does not even give the best performance in Collateral.


FUCK.


It is such a shame, one of the biggest in the Academy's history. I mean, I am not surprised, but it is still a shame. Kill Bill is a masterpiece of filmmaking to live for years to come...

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Tue Jan 25, 2005 4:03 pm
Profile WWW
Teenage Dream
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 8:13 pm
Posts: 10677
Post 
4 nominations for LEMONY SNICKET!!!
and the best animated film - SHARK TALE!!


Tue Jan 25, 2005 4:12 pm
Profile
A very honest-hearted fellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 4767
Post 
Biggest Snub.
Documentary - Some Kind Of Monster.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 4:49 pm
Profile WWW
Cream of the Crop
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:40 pm
Posts: 2987
Location: Free Country, USA
Post 
Am I the only one who's surprised that Paul Giamatti wasn't nominated for best actor? I figured they'd nominate him instead of either Don Cheadle or Clint Eastwood.

_________________
"How you uh, how you comin' on that novel you're working on? Huh? Gotta a big, uh, big stack of papers there? Gotta, gotta nice litte story you're working on there? Your big novel you've been working on for 3 years? Got a, got a compelling protaganist? Yeah? Gotta obstacle for him to overcome? Working on, working on that for quite some time?"

Battle of the 2005 movies - Vote Now!


Tue Jan 25, 2005 4:52 pm
Profile WWW
Hatchling

Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 10:55 pm
Posts: 18
Post 
I am very, very upset that Paul Giamatti didn't get a nod for Best Actor. I heard the nominations over the radio and was shocked when I didn't hear his name.

Peter Sarsgaard not getting a nomination bothers me as well.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 5:01 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post 
Although I kind of saw it coming...

the fact that the Academy nominated two films (Ray and Finding Neverland) that weren't groundbreaking or original and were only good because of their performances. I mean, sheesh, you gave Jamie Foxx and Johnny Depp nominees for Best Actor but aren't the nods in Best Picture pushing it a bit? The films really aren't much better than Monster...

The 7 nods for Finding Neverland were a bit suprising, too.

Frankly, the domination of foreign films was suprising. The fact that The Chorus, The Sea Inside, The Motorcycle Diaries, and A Very Long Engagement each got two nominations. And, Moreno being nominated for Actress. Although she did deserve the nod, a foreign actress hasn't been nominated in a while...

Motorcycle Diaries deserved a nod for cinematography and NOT best song.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 5:13 pm
Profile
life begins now
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm
Posts: 6480
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Post 
Mike Leigh for Vera Drake was the biggest suprise. Clint's nod was also, as well as Shark Tale over The Polar Express. (Especially when Polar got other nods!) I'm also surprised by Alan Alda, who didn't really impress me.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 5:24 pm
Profile YIM
Veteran

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 3014
Location: Kansai
Post 
I was a little surprised by Alda, though I thought he gave the kind of performance that gets nominated in 'best pic sweeps'. I wish I had included him in my final predictions. He just didn't have any buzz going into the nominations.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 5:55 pm
Profile WWW
King Albert!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:04 pm
Posts: 11838
Location: The Happiest City on Earth
Post 
Plot wrote:
Am I the only one who's surprised that Paul Giamatti wasn't nominated for best actor? I figured they'd nominate him instead of either Don Cheadle or Clint Eastwood.


No you are not. I was surprized Paul wasn't nominated. Though I thought Church deserved his more, because he had the better lines. I saw Sideways yesterday, and it deserved every nom it got.

_________________
Visit My Youtube Account and here is what you will see.
Image Image Image and many more.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 5:59 pm
Profile WWW
Veteran

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 3014
Location: Kansai
Post 
You know, I think Clint Eastwood will be a serious threat to Jamie Foxx for actor. Scorsese will win director and if M$B doesn't win picture, Eastwood might win an acting prize. He won't walk away empty-handed this year.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:49 pm
Profile WWW
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32140
Location: the last free city
Post 
Biggest suprise:

Polar Express getting screwed by Sharktale. :lol: GO DREAMWORKS :cool: getting both their animated movies noms.

Jamie Foxx getting 2 noms in teh acting catagory. I was sure he'd get it for Ray but lol not for Collateral.

and teh Best Surprise for me is F/911 not getting any noms. w00t! w00t! \:D/

_________________
Is it 2024 yet?


Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:14 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
Post 
neo_wolf wrote:
The Shark Tale nomination was disgusting.That is one of the worse animated films i have ever seen.


That's the exact same word that came mind for me when they announced them this morning.

What the hell were they thinking?


Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:42 pm
Profile WWW
laneyboy

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 5:14 pm
Posts: 2172
Post 
Although I enjoyed Shark Tale, I can't believe they nominated that compared to The Polar Express. It's just mind boggling to me.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 8:25 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
Post 
Why did they nominate Tupac: Resurrection?

Didn't it come out last year?

:razz:


Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:38 pm
Profile WWW
life begins now
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm
Posts: 6480
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Post 
Dkmuto wrote:
Why did they nominate Tupac: Resurrection?

Didn't it come out last year?

:razz:


That's what I was thinking? Stupid Academy rules...


Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:43 pm
Profile YIM
Top Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm
Posts: 5709
Post 
Was I the only one expecting Paul Giamatti to get snubbed? I didn't expect Eastwood to get in, but I always thought Liam Neeson or Javiar Bardem would get in before Giamatti. His performance did not seem very difficult or special, but most importantly, he didn't have the likeability or charm that his Oscar-nominated co-stars did. While he did a very good job, it was not at all Oscar-friendly.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:56 pm
Profile WWW
King Albert!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:04 pm
Posts: 11838
Location: The Happiest City on Earth
Post 
Chris wrote:
Dkmuto wrote:
Why did they nominate Tupac: Resurrection?

Didn't it come out last year?

:razz:


That's what I was thinking? Stupid Academy rules...


If you look at what Rogue Commander said earlier in this thread, then you will know why.

_________________
Visit My Youtube Account and here is what you will see.
Image Image Image and many more.


Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:19 am
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
Post 
Scott Vasquez wrote:
Chris wrote:
Dkmuto wrote:
Why did they nominate Tupac: Resurrection?

Didn't it come out last year?

:razz:


That's what I was thinking? Stupid Academy rules...


If you look at what Rogue Commander said earlier in this thread, then you will know why.


:sigh:


Wed Jan 26, 2005 3:10 am
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
Post 
Ah, oh yes...

Another one I don't think anyone's pointed out yet (maybe not, though):

No screenplay nom for Kinsey, which I thought was a shoo-in.

I haven't seen it so I can't claim if its status was warranted, but I think we could say that Kinsey is this year's official 'lost in the shuffle' release.


Wed Jan 26, 2005 3:12 am
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
Dkmuto wrote:
Ah, oh yes...

Another one I don't think anyone's pointed out yet (maybe not, though):

No screenplay nom for Kinsey, which I thought was a shoo-in.

I haven't seen it so I can't claim if its status was warranted, but I think we could say that Kinsey is this year's official 'lost in the shuffle' release.


Yeah, Kinsley was totally snubbed. I wonder if that had something to do with its topic or with too good competition


Wed Jan 26, 2005 6:09 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.