Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 9:30 pm



Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
 Why couldnt Ray make 100mil? 
Author Message
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post Why couldnt Ray make 100mil?
Before anybody jumps on me for making a thread like this let me explain. 70mil is quite impressive, but why couldnt it get to 100mil and beyond? The movie was probably one of the most well recieved movies of the year ( it has a A- on Yahoo and 8.1 on IMDb ) yet it still had drops of around 40% each week, was it that the BO was just over saturated with movies or that people just didnt wanna see it no matter the wom?

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Last edited by Joker's Thug #3 on Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:48 pm
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post 
:-s I'm on to you...

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:49 pm
Profile
I'm Batman

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:53 pm
Posts: 5554
Location: Long Island
Post 
This might be the worst thread ever.


Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:50 pm
Profile
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:07 pm
Posts: 1684
Post 
Nothing went wrong. Not enough people were interested in it.


Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:50 pm
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Ray was a very successful film, but it was somewhat fromloaded due to the hype surrounding it (yes, it was there) and the fact that urban flicks (this is somewhat of an urban flick) are usually frontloaded. If it gets nominated for Best Picture, expect a rerelease and it mght even hit $85-90 million then.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:54 pm
Profile WWW
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post 
I think it did okay. Nothing was really expected for this to be big.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:58 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Ray was a very successful film, but it was somewhat fromloaded due to the hype surrounding it (yes, it was there) and the fact that urban flicks (this is somewhat of an urban flick) are usually frontloaded. If it gets nominated for Best Picture, expect a rerelease and it mght even hit $85-90 million then.
Wont happen, they decided to go to Dvd early ( Feb 1 ) and make more profit with that then just rerelease it on the big screen.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:58 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
Mr. X wrote:
I think it did okay. Nothing was really expected for this to be big.
I thought the wom would push it further.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:59 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Killuminati510 wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Ray was a very successful film, but it was somewhat fromloaded due to the hype surrounding it (yes, it was there) and the fact that urban flicks (this is somewhat of an urban flick) are usually frontloaded. If it gets nominated for Best Picture, expect a rerelease and it mght even hit $85-90 million then.
Wont happen, they decided to go to Dvd early ( Feb 1 ) and make more profit with that then just rerelease it on the big screen.


Oh...I thought it was coming out on DVD in March...

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:00 pm
Profile WWW
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post 
Killuminati510 wrote:
Mr. X wrote:
I think it did okay. Nothing was really expected for this to be big.
I thought the wom would push it further.


What was the multiplier? 3.5? That isn't terrible. But it's coming out Feb. 1st? That is awfully rushed. You have some points, needn't worry there. But, I don't think this would ever appeal to a mass audience anyway. WOM can't carry a movie all the time.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:01 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
I'm surprised it didn't. After a great opening and great PTA like that, plus the excellent WOM and hype, I was almost positive it would have great legs pushing it past $100 million. Just didn't happen, though.


Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:45 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
It's fairly straight-forward:


I jinxed it.

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:51 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
box_2005 wrote:
It's fairly straight-forward:


I jinxed it.
[-(

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:51 am
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am
Posts: 9966
Post 
It was released at an odd time to release this sort of film, but it still opened pretty decently.
then the influx of all the huge animated films and the start of the Oscar shuffle kinda downplayed it.

It still had an incredible run, 40% drops are nothing to complain about, anything under that would be more than awesome.

I think one of the problems was the theatre drop. In the month that Oscar buzz builds the most (December), Ray needed to keep its theatre count high. Also granted it never really hit a high theatre count, it may be one of the reasons why it maxed out where it did.

I think if it kept a theatre count of 1,200+ or at least 1,000+ all throughout December and a bump in the count after nods, it could have easily gone up to $85 million (those winter break weekdays would have helped it alot)

_________________
Top Movies of 2009
1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man

Top Anticipated 2009
1. Nine


Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:55 am
Profile
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
Killuminati510 wrote:
Wont happen, they decided to go to Dvd early ( Feb 1 ) and make more profit with that then just rerelease it on the big screen.

There is a high likelyhood of Ray being announced as Best Picture contendor. Didn't Lost in Translation get a pretty big re-release like 2 weeks before its DVD... and didn't it make a decent amount too?


Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:52 am
Profile WWW
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
andaroo wrote:
Killuminati510 wrote:
Wont happen, they decided to go to Dvd early ( Feb 1 ) and make more profit with that then just rerelease it on the big screen.

There is a high likelyhood of Ray being announced as Best Picture contendor. Didn't Lost in Translation get a pretty big re-release like 2 weeks before its DVD... and didn't it make a decent amount too?


Considering the Oscar nominations are announced January 25, the studio behind Ray would have time to make a decision to postpone the video release if it scored some nominations. And, yes, I think Lost in Translation did make some post-Oscarnom money.


Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:58 am
Profile
Post 
Easy answer.

Ray's superpowers suck.


Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:21 pm
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 17 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.