Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 7:56 pm



Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 The Island:What went wrong? 
Author Message
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:47 pm
Posts: 3917
Location: Las Vegas
Post 
El_Masked_esteROIDe_user wrote:
Now that I think about it. London was right when he said the name of "From Jerry Bruckheimer". It wasnt Michael Bay's movie that were successful because of him but Bruckheimers name and the other big star names that made his movies big. POTC and National Treasure were very big because of the "From Jerry Bruckheimer" name attached to it not to mention Kangaroo Jack which would of bombed if his name wasnt attached to it. Even shows like Without a Trace and CSI owed their success to his name when they first debuted. The only misfire that Bruckheimer had was King Arthur

Lesson learned
Never doubt the power of Bruckheimer


Bad Company, which really was a decent movie, bombed also.

_________________
Dr. RajKumar 4/24/1929 - 4/12/2006
The Greatest Actor Ever.
Thanks for The Best Cinematic Memories of My Life.


Sat Jul 23, 2005 1:25 pm
Profile WWW
Post 
El_Masked_esteROIDe_user wrote:
Now that I think about it. London was right when he said the name of "From Jerry Bruckheimer". It wasnt Michael Bay's movie that were successful because of him but Bruckheimers name and the other big star names that made his movies big. POTC and National Treasure were very big because of the "From Jerry Bruckheimer" name attached to it not to mention Kangaroo Jack which would of bombed if his name wasnt attached to it. Even shows like Without a Trace and CSI owed their success to his name when they first debuted. The only misfire that Bruckheimer had was King Arthur

I guess when people think of the creator of Armageddon. They dont think of Michael Bay but they do think of Jerry Bruckheimer

Lesson learned
Never doubt the power of Bruckheimer


Bruckheimer is a very powerful brand name.

EW's last issue had The Island as its cover story. Bay never told Bruckheimer he was directing The Island and obviously some feelings were hurt. The last thing Bruckheimer told Bay was "just so you know, we passed on it."

Burn!


Sat Jul 23, 2005 1:30 pm
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:47 pm
Posts: 3917
Location: Las Vegas
Post 
While Dreamworks animation is producing hits and monster hits, their stand alone liveaction movies have been pathetic in 2005. The Ring 2 was a poorly made sequel with no quality control at the top. The Island is another example of their incompetence in terms of marketing.

_________________
Dr. RajKumar 4/24/1929 - 4/12/2006
The Greatest Actor Ever.
Thanks for The Best Cinematic Memories of My Life.


Sat Jul 23, 2005 1:37 pm
Profile WWW
Post 
jb007 wrote:
While Dreamworks animation is producing hits and monster hits, their stand alone liveaction movies have been pathetic in 2005. The Ring 2 was a poorly made sequel with no quality control at the top. The Island is another example of their incompetence in terms of marketing.


Here's a thread from a week or so ago about Dreamworks

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10482


Sat Jul 23, 2005 1:40 pm
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 10909
Post 
I wonder,will dreamworks still want bay to direct The Transformers movie?


Sat Jul 23, 2005 1:42 pm
Profile WWW
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post 
jb007 wrote:
While Dreamworks animation is producing hits and monster hits, their stand alone liveaction movies have been pathetic in 2005. The Ring 2 was a poorly made sequel with no quality control at the top. The Island is another example of their incompetence in terms of marketing.


They did do a very good job at selling the original 'Ring' film which lead them to even have the possibility of making a sequel (and a third one is in the pipeline, this time with a smaller budget).


Sat Jul 23, 2005 1:43 pm
Profile
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:47 pm
Posts: 3917
Location: Las Vegas
Post 
Joe wrote:
jb007 wrote:
While Dreamworks animation is producing hits and monster hits, their stand alone liveaction movies have been pathetic in 2005. The Ring 2 was a poorly made sequel with no quality control at the top. The Island is another example of their incompetence in terms of marketing.


They did do a very good job at selling the original 'Ring' film which lead them to even have the possibility of making a sequel (and a third one is in the pipeline, this time with a smaller budget).


I agree. But with the goodwill factor from the first movie they could have made The Ring 2 a monster hit with a good plot and director.

_________________
Dr. RajKumar 4/24/1929 - 4/12/2006
The Greatest Actor Ever.
Thanks for The Best Cinematic Memories of My Life.


Sat Jul 23, 2005 1:52 pm
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 67043
Post 
The studio failed it. It gave it one chance to succeed; that being that it was a summer action movie. The trailer didnt really tell me much else.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Sat Jul 23, 2005 2:35 pm
Profile WWW
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 4:57 pm
Posts: 1003
Post 
El_Masked_esteROIDe_user wrote:
Now that I think about it. London was right when he said the name of "From Jerry Bruckheimer". It wasnt Michael Bay's movie that were successful because of him but Bruckheimers name and the other big star names that made his movies big. POTC and National Treasure were very big because of the "From Jerry Bruckheimer" name attached to it not to mention Kangaroo Jack which would of bombed if his name wasnt attached to it. Even shows like Without a Trace and CSI owed their success to his name when they first debuted. The only misfire that Bruckheimer had was King Arthur

I guess when people think of the creator of Armageddon. They dont think of Michael Bay but they do think of Jerry Bruckheimer

Lesson learned
Never doubt the power of Bruckheimer


I couldn't say better myself. Bruckheimer is the most powerful man in Hollywood hands down in my opinion. When people hear "Bruckheimer" during a trailer for an action film, they pretty much ignore the "A Michael Bay film" part. I bet Bay wished he did POTC instead and would have POTC 2 come out next year. I think Bay should get Bruckheimer and Cage to guarantee a summer hit.

_________________
"You're going to tell me what I want to know. The only question is how much you want it to hurt."
Jack Bauer- Season 5


Sat Jul 23, 2005 2:43 pm
Profile WWW
Site Owner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
Post 
Cage is a washed up actor. National Treasure was a fluke. The movie was so good, even he couldn't ruin it.

_________________
Image


Sat Jul 23, 2005 3:53 pm
Profile WWW
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Yeah, there's a lot that went wrong as people have been saying. They didn't have one solid thing to hook people in with, so as some of my friends who usually love these movies wanted to see Bad News Bears more because "it looks like an ultra generic shitty action movie." They also believed that there wouldn't be any fight scenes, just a lot of running around and chases. They had a great supporting cast, but McGregor isn't a star yet, they really should've gotten someone bigger to do it. Also, it does seem like they gave up on the marketing. The trailer that came with War of the Worlds threw out all the epic choral music for some shitty electric guitar nonsense which also really hurt Kingdom of Heaven. Lastly, I'd cite just too much competition. Four wide releases is something that is always very risky, but it can work when the movies have diferent audiences that they go after (just look at June 10th. Mr. and Mrs. Smith ate up all the competition. Shark Boy managed to survive because it had a different audience, but Honeymooners and High Tension were DOA). However, I think all four of the new releases catered more to males, particularly 15-30 year olds. With two very solid holdovers boasting some great WOM, there were just too many movies to choose from. Earlier I wrote an article talking about how this early summer failed so horrifically because there were too many choices and not one solid tentpole, and after the summer seemed to finally catch on for three consecutive weeks where each release did great, they dropped the ball here. Luckily both July 29th and August 5th look to do much better with one big release towering over the other openers which cater to different audiences.


Sat Jul 23, 2005 3:59 pm
Profile
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 4:57 pm
Posts: 1003
Post 
Eagle wrote:
Cage is a washed up actor. National Treasure was a fluke. The movie was so good, even he couldn't ruin it.


Cage + Bruckheimer= $$$$

The Rock, Con Air, Gone in 60 Sec, National Treasure. If you add in Face Off, Cage has been solid as an action star.

_________________
"You're going to tell me what I want to know. The only question is how much you want it to hurt."
Jack Bauer- Season 5


Sat Jul 23, 2005 4:31 pm
Profile WWW
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Eagle wrote:
Cage is a washed up actor. National Treasure was a fluke. The movie was so good, even he couldn't ruin it.


Wait, which movies has he been in lately where he was washed up? Although he was in quite a number of interesting disasters (Snake Eyes, 8MM, after making a large amount of action movies like The Rock, Con Air, and Face/Off), lately he's been in some really great smaller films like Adaptation (which I think was far and away his best performance(s) ever no questions asked) and Matchstick Men. As for National Treasure, I thought that it was Bruckheimer's worst and most boring movie to date, but somehow it was a hit anyways. Either way, the guy is certainly not washed up, and if he was a few years younger would've been a great lead for The Island.


Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:13 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
It's marketing had to be one of the worse in a long time for a big budget flick, I mean common, Devils Rejects and Hustle had more spots.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:45 pm
Profile
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
Eagle wrote:
Cage is a washed up actor. National Treasure was a fluke. The movie was so good, even he couldn't ruin it.


Hold on one sec, the movies Cage has taken the past 5 years are either critically acclaimed movies (Adaptation,Matchstick Men) or box office hits (Gone in 60 Seconds,National Treasure), some are decent movies that werent supposed to set the world on fire like Captain Mandolin or Family Men. How is he washed up? He only had one misfire in a long time and that was Windwalkers


Sat Jul 23, 2005 6:10 pm
Profile
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 67043
Post 
We all know that Cage was not the reason that The Rock hit it big, it was Connery. Americans just can't resist his Scottish charisma. Gone in 60 Seconds was the cars. Con Air was the cons.

Hey the three 'C's....Connery, Cars and Cons......well theres your next movie!!!! I did the ground work for ya'!!!

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Sat Jul 23, 2005 8:29 pm
Profile WWW
Hot Fuss

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 am
Posts: 8427
Location: floridaaa
Post 
Nothing went wrong the film, it was the distributors that fucked it over. Big time.

This is completely different from XXX2, which was marketed heavily. It just happened to suck. :razz:


Sat Jul 23, 2005 8:44 pm
Profile YIM WWW
---------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm
Posts: 11808
Location: Kansas City, Kansas
Post 
It's going to end up like Paycheck. I can't believe I never thought of that movie for a predicting comparison, but it's an almost perfect match. Paycheck had decent legs if I remember. I can still see The Island hitting $50 million.


Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:52 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
MG Casey wrote:
It's going to end up like Paycheck. I can't believe I never thought of that movie for a predicting comparison, but it's an almost perfect match. Paycheck had decent legs if I remember. I can still see The Island hitting $50 million.


Paycheck was released during Christmas.

But, yeah, The Island could have nice legs and reach $50 million...


Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:57 pm
Profile
je vois l'avenir
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:33 pm
Posts: 3841
Location: Hollywood/Berkeley, CA
Post 
MG Casey wrote:
It's going to end up like Paycheck. I can't believe I never thought of that movie for a predicting comparison, but it's an almost perfect match. Paycheck had decent legs if I remember. I can still see The Island hitting $50 million.


For some reason, I'm reminded of Sky Captain.

_________________
"Voici mon secret. Il est très simple: on ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux."

----Antoine de Saint-Exupéry (Le Petit Prince)

A Lonely Person is at Home Everywhere.


Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:42 pm
Profile
je vois l'avenir
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:33 pm
Posts: 3841
Location: Hollywood/Berkeley, CA
Post 
I think like most mentioned the marketing sucked hard, from what I hear, the film is very different than what the trailers indicate

_________________
"Voici mon secret. Il est très simple: on ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux."

----Antoine de Saint-Exupéry (Le Petit Prince)

A Lonely Person is at Home Everywhere.


Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:43 pm
Profile
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 4:35 am
Posts: 1255
Post 
Misutaa Supaakoru wrote:
the film is very different than what the trailers indicate


Since I just finish watching THE ISLAND, I can tell you that the film isn't very different than what the trailers indicate.


Sun Jul 24, 2005 5:50 am
Profile WWW
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:02 am
Posts: 1906
Location: Middle Of Nowhere
Post 
i don't see anything wrong with the movie. i watched it last night i enjoyed the movie very much. it's met my expectation as a Michael Bay films like usual. maybe just lack of star and minus Bruckheimer that's all. overall the movie is WATCHABLE.


Sun Jul 24, 2005 7:40 am
Profile ICQ WWW
No Wire Tampons!

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
Post 
I think everyones just picking at loose ends to try and explain WHY it bombed.
But its pretty clear that Boxofficemojo and so forth knew something we didnt before predicting...

_________________
I'm out.


Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:24 am
Profile WWW
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 4:35 am
Posts: 1255
Post 
Michael wrote:
But its pretty clear that Boxofficemojo and so forth knew something we didnt before predicting...


I think that they had seen the data of "box office tracking".


Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:12 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 197 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.