| Author |
Message |
|
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm
Posts: 12096
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
bABA wrote: Didnt you yourself post that recently? Yeah, but I dind't think anyone else would find it and post it after all this time! _________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 9:56 pm |
 
|
|
|
Ahmed Johnson
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:22 pm
Posts: 2226
Location: Pearl River, Mississippi
|
MG Casey wrote: Jon Lyrik wrote: http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/gay/long.htm Very good find, Lyrik. This is why I am against homosexuality.  _________________
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:04 pm |
|
|
|
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
Ahmed Johnson wrote: MG Casey wrote: Jon Lyrik wrote: http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/gay/long.htm Very good find, Lyrik. This is why I am against homosexuality. language ..
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:06 pm |
|
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68336
|
Bravo to the Pope. =D>
I am not saying i agree with him, or i disagree, but i like it that he is speaking his mind and can still annoy people at his age, Bravo to the Pope!!! =D>
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:19 pm |
|
|
|
lovemerox
Forum General
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm
Posts: 6499
Location: Down along the dixie line
|
Algren wrote: Bravo to the Pope. =D>
I am not saying i agree with him, or i disagree, but i like it that he is speaking his mind and can still annoy people at his age, Bravo to the Pope!!! =D>  Care to explain your assinine comment better?
I mean we know you hate "fags"....but explinations are always better _________________
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:22 pm |
|
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68336
|
lovemerox wrote: Care to explain your comment better? No. _________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:41 pm |
|
|
|
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
|
lovemerox wrote: Algren wrote: Bravo to the Pope. =D>
I am not saying i agree with him, or i disagree, but i like it that he is speaking his mind and can still annoy people at his age, Bravo to the Pope!!! =D> Care to explain your assinine comment better? I mean we know you hate "fags"....but explinations are always better There is nothing assinine about anything that Algren said. He was applauding the pope for exercising his freedom of speech. The 'annoy' part is odd, but meh.
So...
What part don't you understand? Why he is defending the pope's right to express his views, or the 'annoy' part. Personally, I'd pick the 'annoy' part. What do you mean by 'still annoy people at his age' Algren? Lovemerox would like to know. And so would I  _________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:44 pm |
|
|
|
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
|
Ahmed Johnson wrote: MG Casey wrote: Jon Lyrik wrote: http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/gay/long.htm Very good find, Lyrik. This is why I am against homosexuality. Why don't you provide some arguments to support your viewpoint so that MG can understand why you disagree with him instead of throwing off some insults? _________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:46 pm |
|
|
|
lovemerox
Forum General
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm
Posts: 6499
Location: Down along the dixie line
|
Algren wrote: lovemerox wrote: Care to explain your comment better? No. Figures as much...dont post if your to ignorant to explain your statement _________________
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:54 pm |
|
|
|
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am
Posts: 9247
|
box_2005 wrote: There is nothing assinine about anything that Algren said. He was applauding the pope for exercising his freedom of speech. The 'annoy' part is odd, but meh. So... What part don't you understand? Why he is defending the pope's right to express his views, or the 'annoy' part. Personally, I'd pick the 'annoy' part. What do you mean by 'still annoy people at his age' Algren? Lovemerox would like to know. And so would I He was applauding the pope for doing something billions of people do everyday?
If you're going to applaud the pope, do it for something unique he's done.
The fact is, and this is way lovemerox was annoyed by Algren's post, he was just baiting. It's all he does. He goes from thread to thread and baits people into arguments.
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:55 pm |
|
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68336
|
 box_2005 wrote: lovemerox wrote: Algren wrote: Bravo to the Pope. =D>
I am not saying i agree with him, or i disagree, but i like it that he is speaking his mind and can still annoy people at his age, Bravo to the Pope!!! =D> Care to explain your assinine comment better? I mean we know you hate "fags"....but explinations are always better There is nothing assinine about anything that Algren said. He was applauding the pope for exercising his freedom of speech. The 'annoy' part is odd, but meh. So... What part don't you understand? Why he is defending the pope's right to express his views, or the 'annoy' part. Personally, I'd pick the 'annoy' part. What do you mean by 'still annoy people at his age' Algren? Lovemerox would like to know. And so would I It's brilliant to see someone at his age make a difference, well, not a difference as such, but by saying what he said he was influencing something or someone somewhere...one person being Pinkpanther, he was annoyed by what the Pope said.
Only because he is an old man, doesnt mean he is entirely useless.
Sorta thing. _________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:58 pm |
|
|
|
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
|
makeshift wrote:
He was applauding the pope for doing something billions of people do everyday?
If you're going to applaud the pope, do it for something unique he's done.
The fact is, and this is way lovemerox was annoyed by Algren's post, he was just baiting. It's all he does. He goes from thread to thread and baits people into arguments.
I applaude every single human being who has ever exercised their right to express their viewpoint. I even applaude myself. You can never applaude anyone enough for it. It's a beautiful thing, and it's more fragile than you might think.
Btw, could've fooled me as to who was baiting whom. Anyways, is this thread turning into a joke? I'm not sure whether the serious conversation has ceased or not. Too bad if it did. _________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:59 pm |
|
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68336
|
lovemerox wrote: Figures as much...dont post if your to ignorant to explain your statement I'll edit that post for you, and use it against you:
dont post. :razz: _________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:02 pm |
|
|
|
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
|
Algren wrote: It's brilliant to see someone at his age make a difference, well, not a difference as such, but by saying what he said he was influencing something or someone somewhere...one person being Pinkpanther, he was annoyed by what the Pope said. Only because he is an old man, doesnt mean he is entirely useless. Sorta thing. Wait, what? Annoying someone is not an indication that what you're saying is a good thing. If it gets discussion going, then yeah, it might be good. Applauding someone expressing their freedom of speech, yeah, that's great.
Anyways, warped logic. You seem to be mixing two completely different things here. _________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:02 pm |
|
|
|
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am
Posts: 9247
|
box_2005 wrote: makeshift wrote:
He was applauding the pope for doing something billions of people do everyday?
If you're going to applaud the pope, do it for something unique he's done.
The fact is, and this is way lovemerox was annoyed by Algren's post, he was just baiting. It's all he does. He goes from thread to thread and baits people into arguments.
Btw, could've fooled me as to who was baiting whom. What? Algren had not said a single thing in this thread. He comes in, praises the pope's actions (which will obviously piss people off), and gives no reason for why he did so until after the fact.
That's the very definiton of baiting.
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:02 pm |
|
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68336
|
box_2005 wrote: Annoying someone is not an indication that what you're saying is a good thing. I know, but its brilliant to hear about. \:D/ _________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:06 pm |
|
|
|
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
|
Maybe it's not. Canada's human rights legislation has a superb definition:
"A course of vexatious comment or conduct that is known or ought reasonably to be known to be unwelcome"
Algren's post is impulsive, not intentionally vexatious. It's not significant enough to be baiting.
If he said, I applaude the pope for sticking it to the gays and for pissing off lovemerox and Pinkpanther (no puns intended here), then that would approach baiting. Maybe the 'annoy' part implied baiting. It's possible.  _________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:08 pm |
|
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68336
|
makeshift wrote: What? Algren had not said a single thing in this thread. He comes in, praises the pope's actions (which will obviously piss people off), and gives no reason for why he did so until after the fact.
That's the very definiton of baiting. What? get a grip of yourself. You are too easy to annoy obviously....grow some stamina. _________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:08 pm |
|
|
|
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
|
Algren wrote: box_2005 wrote: Annoying someone is not an indication that what you're saying is a good thing. I know, but its brilliant to hear about. \:D/ No, it is not. At least, it shouldn't be! The idea behind an argument is to win the other side over. If it annoys, that means you've failed. _________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:09 pm |
|
|
|
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am
Posts: 9247
|
box_2005 wrote: Maybe it's not. Canada's human rights legislation has a superb definition: "A course of vexatious comment or conduct that is known or ought reasonably to be known to be unwelcome" Algren's post is impulsive, not intentionally vexatious. It's not significant enough to be baiting. If he said, I applaude the pope for sticking it to the gays and for pissing off lovemerox and Pinkpanther (no puns intended here), then that would approach baiting. Maybe the 'annoy' part implied baiting. It's possible. Ha! I didin't know there was definitions for internet lingo. Good find, boxy.
Either way, it was obnoxious.
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:09 pm |
|
|
|
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am
Posts: 9247
|
Algren wrote: makeshift wrote: What? Algren had not said a single thing in this thread. He comes in, praises the pope's actions (which will obviously piss people off), and gives no reason for why he did so until after the fact.
That's the very definiton of baiting. What? get a grip of yourself. You are too easy to annoy obviously....grow some stamina. Stamina? Do you even know what that word means?
And no, i'm not easy to annoy. I'm just fed up with you. Not just in this thread, but your actions all over the board.
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:11 pm |
|
|
|
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
|
makeshift wrote: box_2005 wrote: Maybe it's not. Canada's human rights legislation has a superb definition: "A course of vexatious comment or conduct that is known or ought reasonably to be known to be unwelcome" Algren's post is impulsive, not intentionally vexatious. It's not significant enough to be baiting. If he said, I applaude the pope for sticking it to the gays and for pissing off lovemerox and Pinkpanther (no puns intended here), then that would approach baiting. Maybe the 'annoy' part implied baiting. It's possible. Ha! I didin't know there was definitions for internet lingo. Good find. boxy. Either way, it was obnoxious. Lol, makeshift, the definition is actually for harassment, but it was good enough for baiting (which is a form of harassment).
I forgot to add that to the post! Damn my impulsiveness  _________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:11 pm |
|
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68336
|
makeshift wrote: I'm just fed up with you. Not just in this thread, but your actions all over the board. lol, Thats ironic.....same answer: grow some stamina. _________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:14 pm |
|
|
|
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am
Posts: 9247
|
Algren wrote: makeshift wrote: I'm just fed up with you. Not just in this thread, but your actions all over the board. lol, Thats ironic.....same answer: grow some stamina. As soon as you learn when to use the word stamina properly.
I'm done with you.
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:16 pm |
|
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68336
|
How about one for a better word.....you are a jerk.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
| Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:19 pm |
|
|
