Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 5:14 pm



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 332 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
 Controversial Picture! What are your thoughts? 
Author Message
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68321
Post 
neostorm wrote:
I would bet all my belongings that deep deep deep deep down you are ashamed of your homosexuality.


Im not a homosexual.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:31 pm
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68321
Post 
rusty wrote:
Algren wrote:
Jon Lyrik wrote:
Remember kids, women on women is hot, men on men is disgusting!


Glad to see ive made an impact :wink:


If you think that homosexuality as in only being men on men disgusting then that is being ignorant.

rusty i was having a joke with the man, i didnt mean it literally.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:31 pm
Profile WWW
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
Post 
Jon Lyrik wrote:
Image


Amen.. [-o<


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:32 pm
Profile WWW
rustiphica

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:59 pm
Posts: 8687
Post 
Algren wrote:
rusty wrote:
Algren wrote:
Jon Lyrik wrote:
Remember kids, women on women is hot, men on men is disgusting!


Glad to see ive made an impact :wink:


If you think that homosexuality as in only being men on men disgusting then that is being ignorant.

rusty i was having a joke with the man, i didnt mean it literally.


touché my good britlandians, touché


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:32 pm
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:21 am
Posts: 4694
Location: Cambridge, England.
Post 
Algren wrote:
neostorm wrote:
I would bet all my belongings that deep deep deep deep down you are ashamed of your homosexuality.


Im not a homosexual.


sure? I do remember a while ago you requesting shots of Sly working out :???:

_________________
Image


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:32 pm
Profile WWW
Hot Fuss

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 am
Posts: 8427
Location: floridaaa
Post 
Algren wrote:
zach wrote:
Another instance where you suddenly have amnesia. I will go dig up some quotes of you CLEARLY using the word homosexuality without the clarification of the male gender if I need to.


I am aware of that, but I know what i was talking about.


Yet you still said it repeatedly when it was pointed out. You continued to defend that point, even when we questioned your idea of homosexuality only referring to male on male.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:33 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post 
neostorm wrote:
Jon Lyrik wrote:
Image


Amen.. [-o<


Eh...this debate is useless. People don't change their beliefs just because of a thread.

I should just stop.

Either way, Algren's obsession with Stallone definitely makes me think there is some closeted stuff at work.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Last edited by Tyler on Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:33 pm
Profile
Hot Fuss

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 am
Posts: 8427
Location: floridaaa
Post 
Algren wrote:
rusty wrote:
Algren wrote:
Jon Lyrik wrote:
Remember kids, women on women is hot, men on men is disgusting!


Glad to see ive made an impact :wink:


If you think that homosexuality as in only being men on men disgusting then that is being ignorant.

rusty i was having a joke with the man, i didnt mean it literally.


Then, again, why do you keep saying that you like women on women, but men on men is wrong? Are you joking or not, already?


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:34 pm
Profile YIM WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68321
Post 
zach wrote:
I love how you speak for others. I've already admitted speaking for your parents was wrong by dropping it. But you insist on thinking that you can speak for my parents. You can only speak for yourself. And speaking for myself, yes, I think you are hideously unattractive.


You are bound to say that you moron, because ive insulted you, you feel its neccassary to insult me back. Youre lame, and im just as lame for ever liking you.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:34 pm
Profile WWW
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
Algren wrote:
zach wrote:
Ha. That's the biggest piece of shit i've read all day, maybe all week! So, you are saying that you are normal over me? What is normal? You are just as fucked up as anyone else here, mister. The word normal is so pointless, because nothing is normal. I can't believe you would try and put yourself over others because of their sexuality. Don't get me started.


Thats another thing they do, theyre so camp, but with a temper, whats this "dont get me started" meant to imply? as if i'd be scared when youa re "started"? LMFAO no way!!! ha ha ha

Ive thought about that before neostorm, but then thought about the "good" gays, then decided it wouldnt be a good idea.


You are a piece of garbage. I cannot believe you said that. Actually, I can.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:36 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post 
Image

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:36 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 11029
Post 
Jon Lyrik wrote:
b) Plus, he was rugged, longhaired, Left liberal, ahoy!



How ignorant! You really believe that image Davinci painted?
Historians say jesus most like did not have long hair but that he had short curly hair and every damn person in those days looked rugged.But yeah,he was pretty liberal,he was even more liberal than liberals want to be,hell,he picked Paul to preach for the gentiles and Paul became his biggest preacher,and paul was the defenition of a conservitive person,there should be a picture of ST. paul next to the word conservitive in the dictionary.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:36 pm
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68321
Post 
hans wrote:
Algren wrote:
neostorm wrote:
I would bet all my belongings that deep deep deep deep down you are ashamed of your homosexuality.


Im not a homosexual.


sure? I do remember a while ago you requesting shots of Sly working out :???:


Thats a cokpletely different matter hans, which i think i explained at the time.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:36 pm
Profile WWW
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:22 pm
Posts: 2226
Location: Pearl River, Mississippi
Post 
Mike Ventrella wrote:
Snrub wrote:
It's a fucking book! A book!

Doesn't anyone else find that a little ridiculous?! Who gives a shit, honestly?


Indeed --- and every damn religion on the planet, even those that no longer exist, have such a book. And every single religion is convinced that their book is the absolute truth, and all the others are complete fiction.

Of course, the people who read these books nowadays are more enlightened -- they only believe the parts of the book they agree with. The parts of the Bible that support slavery, selling your children, and stoning people to death for petty crimes like planting crops next to each other that are forbidden are ignored because we have evolved past such things, but for some reason the part prohibiting homosexuality is still as powerful as ever.

People who use the Bible to argue their viewpoints will never win an argument against people who actually think.




=D> =D> =D> =D> God-like! =D> =D> =D> [/quote]

_________________
Image


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:37 pm
Profile WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post 
neo_wolf wrote:
Jon Lyrik wrote:
b) Plus, he was rugged, longhaired, Left liberal, ahoy!



How ignorant! You really believe that image Davinci painted?
Historians say jesus most like did not have long hair but that he had short curly hair and every damn person in those days looked rugged.But yeah,he was pretty liberal,he was even more liberal than liberals want to be,hell,he picked Paul to preach for the gentiles and Paul became his biggest preacher,and paul was the defenition of a conservitive person,there should be a picture of ST. paul next to the word conservitive in the dictionary.


Oh for God's sake, I was kidding. I even said I was being lighthearted. Can you comprehend that? ](*,)

But can we agree that Jesus was a leftie, if not a liberal?

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:38 pm
Profile
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68321
Post 
Libs wrote:
Algren wrote:
zach wrote:
Ha. That's the biggest piece of shit i've read all day, maybe all week! So, you are saying that you are normal over me? What is normal? You are just as fucked up as anyone else here, mister. The word normal is so pointless, because nothing is normal. I can't believe you would try and put yourself over others because of their sexuality. Don't get me started.


Thats another thing they do, theyre so camp, but with a temper, whats this "dont get me started" meant to imply? as if i'd be scared when youa re "started"? LMFAO no way!!! ha ha ha

Ive thought about that before neostorm, but then thought about the "good" gays, then decided it wouldnt be a good idea.


You are a piece of garbage. I cannot believe you said that. Actually, I can.


What a suprise to see Libs here slagging me off :roll: whats the matter libs? disgusted that someone can actually have views that dont agree with you? :shock: :razz:

or maybe im just the only male that doesnt suck upto you, in hope of getting some cyber love, pathetic.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:39 pm
Profile WWW
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
Post 
Jon Lyrik wrote:
Image



LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Image
Image

Boo i'll try chaing this


Last edited by Neostorm on Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:40 pm
Profile WWW
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
Algren wrote:
Libs wrote:
Algren wrote:
zach wrote:
Ha. That's the biggest piece of shit i've read all day, maybe all week! So, you are saying that you are normal over me? What is normal? You are just as fucked up as anyone else here, mister. The word normal is so pointless, because nothing is normal. I can't believe you would try and put yourself over others because of their sexuality. Don't get me started.


Thats another thing they do, theyre so camp, but with a temper, whats this "dont get me started" meant to imply? as if i'd be scared when youa re "started"? LMFAO no way!!! ha ha ha

Ive thought about that before neostorm, but then thought about the "good" gays, then decided it wouldnt be a good idea.


You are a piece of garbage. I cannot believe you said that. Actually, I can.


What a suprise to see Libs here slagging me off :roll: whats the matter libs? disgusted that someone can actually have views that dont agree with you? :shock: :razz:

or maybe im just the only male that doesnt suck upto you, in hope of getting some cyber love, pathetic.


I think I'm more disgusted that you actually *agreed* with an ironic joke that we should put all the gays in concentration camps and burn them to death.

Don't say you were "kidding"; your comments in this thread will show that no one will believe you.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:41 pm
Profile
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68321
Post 
zach wrote:
Then, again, why do you keep saying that you like women on women, but men on men is wrong? Are you joking or not, already?


I am not joking, already :razz: i loathe men on men (its wrong), women on women is a-okay ( :wink: )

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:41 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 11029
Post 
Jon Lyrik wrote:
neo_wolf wrote:
Jon Lyrik wrote:
b) Plus, he was rugged, longhaired, Left liberal, ahoy!



How ignorant! You really believe that image Davinci painted?
Historians say jesus most like did not have long hair but that he had short curly hair and every damn person in those days looked rugged.But yeah,he was pretty liberal,he was even more liberal than liberals want to be,hell,he picked Paul to preach for the gentiles and Paul became his biggest preacher,and paul was the defenition of a conservitive person,there should be a picture of ST. paul next to the word conservitive in the dictionary.


Oh for God's sake, I was kidding. I even said I was being lighthearted. Can you comprehend that? ](*,)

But can we agree that Jesus was a leftie, if not a liberal?


He isnt a conservitive or a lefty,he is above being in one of those sides,he was sent by God on a mission to save us all, conservitives and liberals and others.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:41 pm
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68321
Post 
Libs wrote:
I think I'm more disgusted that you actually *agreed* with an ironic joke that we should put all the gays in concentration camps and burn them to death.

Don't say you were "kidding"; your comments in this thread will show that no one will believe you.


Why would i even try and say i was kidding? OFC I WASNT KIDDING, IVE THOUGHT THAT BEFORE AND ID HAPPILY THINK IT AGAIN!

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:43 pm
Profile WWW
rustiphica

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:59 pm
Posts: 8687
Post 
neo_wolf wrote:
Jon Lyrik wrote:
neo_wolf wrote:
Jon Lyrik wrote:
b) Plus, he was rugged, longhaired, Left liberal, ahoy!



How ignorant! You really believe that image Davinci painted?
Historians say jesus most like did not have long hair but that he had short curly hair and every damn person in those days looked rugged.But yeah,he was pretty liberal,he was even more liberal than liberals want to be,hell,he picked Paul to preach for the gentiles and Paul became his biggest preacher,and paul was the defenition of a conservitive person,there should be a picture of ST. paul next to the word conservitive in the dictionary.


Oh for God's sake, I was kidding. I even said I was being lighthearted. Can you comprehend that? ](*,)

But can we agree that Jesus was a leftie, if not a liberal?


He isnt a conservitive or a lefty,he is above being in one of those sides,he was sent by God on a mission to save us all, conservitives and liberals and others.


Holy shit that is a good one. *applauds neo for that one*


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:43 pm
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
Post 
Image

Image


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:45 pm
Profile WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post 
neo_wolf wrote:
Jon Lyrik wrote:
neo_wolf wrote:
Jon Lyrik wrote:
b) Plus, he was rugged, longhaired, Left liberal, ahoy!



How ignorant! You really believe that image Davinci painted?
Historians say jesus most like did not have long hair but that he had short curly hair and every damn person in those days looked rugged.But yeah,he was pretty liberal,he was even more liberal than liberals want to be,hell,he picked Paul to preach for the gentiles and Paul became his biggest preacher,and paul was the defenition of a conservitive person,there should be a picture of ST. paul next to the word conservitive in the dictionary.


Oh for God's sake, I was kidding. I even said I was being lighthearted. Can you comprehend that? ](*,)

But can we agree that Jesus was a leftie, if not a liberal?


He isnt a conservitive or a lefty,he is above being in one of those sides,he was sent by God on a mission to save us all, conservitives and liberals and others.


Whatever. To me he was just a rabbi who had some things to say about love and brotherhood.

Though labels can be bad when they go overboard.

Anyway.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Somebody, please lock this topic. ASAP.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:45 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 11029
Post 
Its been a pleasure talking to you in this thread Jon,i liked our debates and it was civilized,unlike Snrub who only talked shit and went away when he knew he was beat.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:47 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.   [ 332 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.