Author |
Message |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68321
|
neostorm wrote: I would bet all my belongings that deep deep deep deep down you are ashamed of your homosexuality.
Im not a homosexual.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:31 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68321
|
rusty wrote: Algren wrote: Jon Lyrik wrote: Remember kids, women on women is hot, men on men is disgusting! Glad to see ive made an impact :wink: If you think that homosexuality as in only being men on men disgusting then that is being ignorant.
rusty i was having a joke with the man, i didnt mean it literally.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:31 pm |
|
 |
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm Posts: 4684 Location: Toronto
|
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:32 pm |
|
 |
rusty
rustiphica
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:59 pm Posts: 8687
|
Algren wrote: rusty wrote: Algren wrote: Jon Lyrik wrote: Remember kids, women on women is hot, men on men is disgusting! Glad to see ive made an impact :wink: If you think that homosexuality as in only being men on men disgusting then that is being ignorant. rusty i was having a joke with the man, i didnt mean it literally.
touché my good britlandians, touché
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:32 pm |
|
 |
Bodrul
All Star Poster
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:21 am Posts: 4694 Location: Cambridge, England.
|
Algren wrote: neostorm wrote: I would bet all my belongings that deep deep deep deep down you are ashamed of your homosexuality. Im not a homosexual.
sure? I do remember a while ago you requesting shots of Sly working out :???:
_________________
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:32 pm |
|
 |
Maximus
Hot Fuss
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 am Posts: 8427 Location: floridaaa
|
Algren wrote: zach wrote: Another instance where you suddenly have amnesia. I will go dig up some quotes of you CLEARLY using the word homosexuality without the clarification of the male gender if I need to. I am aware of that, but I know what i was talking about.
Yet you still said it repeatedly when it was pointed out. You continued to defend that point, even when we questioned your idea of homosexuality only referring to male on male.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:33 pm |
|
 |
Tyler
Powered By Hate
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm Posts: 7578 Location: Torrington, CT
|
Eh...this debate is useless. People don't change their beliefs just because of a thread.
I should just stop.
Either way, Algren's obsession with Stallone definitely makes me think there is some closeted stuff at work.
_________________ It's my lucky crack pipe.
Last edited by Tyler on Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:33 pm |
|
 |
Maximus
Hot Fuss
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 am Posts: 8427 Location: floridaaa
|
Algren wrote: rusty wrote: Algren wrote: Jon Lyrik wrote: Remember kids, women on women is hot, men on men is disgusting! Glad to see ive made an impact :wink: If you think that homosexuality as in only being men on men disgusting then that is being ignorant. rusty i was having a joke with the man, i didnt mean it literally.
Then, again, why do you keep saying that you like women on women, but men on men is wrong? Are you joking or not, already?
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:34 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68321
|
zach wrote: I love how you speak for others. I've already admitted speaking for your parents was wrong by dropping it. But you insist on thinking that you can speak for my parents. You can only speak for yourself. And speaking for myself, yes, I think you are hideously unattractive.
You are bound to say that you moron, because ive insulted you, you feel its neccassary to insult me back. Youre lame, and im just as lame for ever liking you.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:34 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
Algren wrote: zach wrote: Ha. That's the biggest piece of shit i've read all day, maybe all week! So, you are saying that you are normal over me? What is normal? You are just as fucked up as anyone else here, mister. The word normal is so pointless, because nothing is normal. I can't believe you would try and put yourself over others because of their sexuality. Don't get me started. Thats another thing they do, theyre so camp, but with a temper, whats this "dont get me started" meant to imply? as if i'd be scared when youa re "started"? LMFAO no way!!! ha ha ha Ive thought about that before neostorm, but then thought about the "good" gays, then decided it wouldnt be a good idea.
You are a piece of garbage. I cannot believe you said that. Actually, I can.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:36 pm |
|
 |
Tyler
Powered By Hate
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm Posts: 7578 Location: Torrington, CT
|
_________________ It's my lucky crack pipe.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:36 pm |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11029
|
Jon Lyrik wrote: b) Plus, he was rugged, longhaired, Left liberal, ahoy!
How ignorant! You really believe that image Davinci painted?
Historians say jesus most like did not have long hair but that he had short curly hair and every damn person in those days looked rugged.But yeah,he was pretty liberal,he was even more liberal than liberals want to be,hell,he picked Paul to preach for the gentiles and Paul became his biggest preacher,and paul was the defenition of a conservitive person,there should be a picture of ST. paul next to the word conservitive in the dictionary.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:36 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68321
|
hans wrote: Algren wrote: neostorm wrote: I would bet all my belongings that deep deep deep deep down you are ashamed of your homosexuality. Im not a homosexual. sure? I do remember a while ago you requesting shots of Sly working out :???:
Thats a cokpletely different matter hans, which i think i explained at the time.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:36 pm |
|
 |
Ahmed Johnson
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:22 pm Posts: 2226 Location: Pearl River, Mississippi
|
Mike Ventrella wrote: Snrub wrote: It's a fucking book! A book!
Doesn't anyone else find that a little ridiculous?! Who gives a shit, honestly? Indeed --- and every damn religion on the planet, even those that no longer exist, have such a book. And every single religion is convinced that their book is the absolute truth, and all the others are complete fiction. Of course, the people who read these books nowadays are more enlightened -- they only believe the parts of the book they agree with. The parts of the Bible that support slavery, selling your children, and stoning people to death for petty crimes like planting crops next to each other that are forbidden are ignored because we have evolved past such things, but for some reason the part prohibiting homosexuality is still as powerful as ever. People who use the Bible to argue their viewpoints will never win an argument against people who actually think. =D> =D> =D> =D> God-like! =D> =D> =D> [/quote]
_________________
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:37 pm |
|
 |
Tyler
Powered By Hate
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm Posts: 7578 Location: Torrington, CT
|
neo_wolf wrote: Jon Lyrik wrote: b) Plus, he was rugged, longhaired, Left liberal, ahoy!
How ignorant! You really believe that image Davinci painted? Historians say jesus most like did not have long hair but that he had short curly hair and every damn person in those days looked rugged.But yeah,he was pretty liberal,he was even more liberal than liberals want to be,hell,he picked Paul to preach for the gentiles and Paul became his biggest preacher,and paul was the defenition of a conservitive person,there should be a picture of ST. paul next to the word conservitive in the dictionary.
Oh for God's sake, I was kidding. I even said I was being lighthearted. Can you comprehend that? ](*,)
But can we agree that Jesus was a leftie, if not a liberal?
_________________ It's my lucky crack pipe.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:38 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68321
|
Libs wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: Ha. That's the biggest piece of shit i've read all day, maybe all week! So, you are saying that you are normal over me? What is normal? You are just as fucked up as anyone else here, mister. The word normal is so pointless, because nothing is normal. I can't believe you would try and put yourself over others because of their sexuality. Don't get me started. Thats another thing they do, theyre so camp, but with a temper, whats this "dont get me started" meant to imply? as if i'd be scared when youa re "started"? LMFAO no way!!! ha ha ha Ive thought about that before neostorm, but then thought about the "good" gays, then decided it wouldnt be a good idea. You are a piece of garbage. I cannot believe you said that. Actually, I can.
What a suprise to see Libs here slagging me off  whats the matter libs? disgusted that someone can actually have views that dont agree with you?  :razz:
or maybe im just the only male that doesnt suck upto you, in hope of getting some cyber love, pathetic.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:39 pm |
|
 |
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm Posts: 4684 Location: Toronto
|
LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Boo i'll try chaing this
Last edited by Neostorm on Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:40 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
Algren wrote: Libs wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: Ha. That's the biggest piece of shit i've read all day, maybe all week! So, you are saying that you are normal over me? What is normal? You are just as fucked up as anyone else here, mister. The word normal is so pointless, because nothing is normal. I can't believe you would try and put yourself over others because of their sexuality. Don't get me started. Thats another thing they do, theyre so camp, but with a temper, whats this "dont get me started" meant to imply? as if i'd be scared when youa re "started"? LMFAO no way!!! ha ha ha Ive thought about that before neostorm, but then thought about the "good" gays, then decided it wouldnt be a good idea. You are a piece of garbage. I cannot believe you said that. Actually, I can. What a suprise to see Libs here slagging me off  whats the matter libs? disgusted that someone can actually have views that dont agree with you?  :razz: or maybe im just the only male that doesnt suck upto you, in hope of getting some cyber love, pathetic.
I think I'm more disgusted that you actually *agreed* with an ironic joke that we should put all the gays in concentration camps and burn them to death.
Don't say you were "kidding"; your comments in this thread will show that no one will believe you.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:41 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68321
|
zach wrote: Then, again, why do you keep saying that you like women on women, but men on men is wrong? Are you joking or not, already?
I am not joking, already :razz: i loathe men on men (its wrong), women on women is a-okay ( :wink: )
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:41 pm |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11029
|
Jon Lyrik wrote: neo_wolf wrote: Jon Lyrik wrote: b) Plus, he was rugged, longhaired, Left liberal, ahoy!
How ignorant! You really believe that image Davinci painted? Historians say jesus most like did not have long hair but that he had short curly hair and every damn person in those days looked rugged.But yeah,he was pretty liberal,he was even more liberal than liberals want to be,hell,he picked Paul to preach for the gentiles and Paul became his biggest preacher,and paul was the defenition of a conservitive person,there should be a picture of ST. paul next to the word conservitive in the dictionary. Oh for God's sake, I was kidding. I even said I was being lighthearted. Can you comprehend that? ](*,) But can we agree that Jesus was a leftie, if not a liberal?
He isnt a conservitive or a lefty,he is above being in one of those sides,he was sent by God on a mission to save us all, conservitives and liberals and others.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:41 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68321
|
Libs wrote: I think I'm more disgusted that you actually *agreed* with an ironic joke that we should put all the gays in concentration camps and burn them to death.
Don't say you were "kidding"; your comments in this thread will show that no one will believe you.
Why would i even try and say i was kidding? OFC I WASNT KIDDING, IVE THOUGHT THAT BEFORE AND ID HAPPILY THINK IT AGAIN!
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:43 pm |
|
 |
rusty
rustiphica
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:59 pm Posts: 8687
|
neo_wolf wrote: Jon Lyrik wrote: neo_wolf wrote: Jon Lyrik wrote: b) Plus, he was rugged, longhaired, Left liberal, ahoy!
How ignorant! You really believe that image Davinci painted? Historians say jesus most like did not have long hair but that he had short curly hair and every damn person in those days looked rugged.But yeah,he was pretty liberal,he was even more liberal than liberals want to be,hell,he picked Paul to preach for the gentiles and Paul became his biggest preacher,and paul was the defenition of a conservitive person,there should be a picture of ST. paul next to the word conservitive in the dictionary. Oh for God's sake, I was kidding. I even said I was being lighthearted. Can you comprehend that? ](*,) But can we agree that Jesus was a leftie, if not a liberal? He isnt a conservitive or a lefty,he is above being in one of those sides,he was sent by God on a mission to save us all, conservitives and liberals and others.
Holy shit that is a good one. *applauds neo for that one*
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:43 pm |
|
 |
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm Posts: 4684 Location: Toronto
|
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:45 pm |
|
 |
Tyler
Powered By Hate
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm Posts: 7578 Location: Torrington, CT
|
neo_wolf wrote: Jon Lyrik wrote: neo_wolf wrote: Jon Lyrik wrote: b) Plus, he was rugged, longhaired, Left liberal, ahoy!
How ignorant! You really believe that image Davinci painted? Historians say jesus most like did not have long hair but that he had short curly hair and every damn person in those days looked rugged.But yeah,he was pretty liberal,he was even more liberal than liberals want to be,hell,he picked Paul to preach for the gentiles and Paul became his biggest preacher,and paul was the defenition of a conservitive person,there should be a picture of ST. paul next to the word conservitive in the dictionary. Oh for God's sake, I was kidding. I even said I was being lighthearted. Can you comprehend that? ](*,) But can we agree that Jesus was a leftie, if not a liberal? He isnt a conservitive or a lefty,he is above being in one of those sides,he was sent by God on a mission to save us all, conservitives and liberals and others.
Whatever. To me he was just a rabbi who had some things to say about love and brotherhood.
Though labels can be bad when they go overboard.
Anyway.
Somebody, please lock this topic. ASAP.
_________________ It's my lucky crack pipe.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:45 pm |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11029
|
Its been a pleasure talking to you in this thread Jon,i liked our debates and it was civilized,unlike Snrub who only talked shit and went away when he knew he was beat.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:47 pm |
|
|