Author |
Message |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68326
|
Yes, penetration, you were correct, thats just disgusting.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:04 pm |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11029
|
Snrub wrote: [ I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. If MLK ever made clear his objections to homosexuals or homosexual acts (either directly or through his interpretations of the bible) then yes, regardless of the good he did, he was a both a bigot and ignorant.
He was a babtis reverand,ever hear a babtis reverand doing his sermon?
He preached and believed everything in the bible,if he didnt then why was he a reverand until his death?
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:06 pm |
|
 |
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
Algren wrote: Yes, penetration, you were correct, thats just disgusting.
So i'm assuming you find anal sex between a man and a women disgusting too, right?
You also find two women penetrating each other with various objects disgusting, right?
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:06 pm |
|
 |
Bodrul
All Star Poster
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:21 am Posts: 4694 Location: Cambridge, England.
|
Algren wrote: Yes, penetration, you were correct, thats just disgusting.
you secretly love it
_________________
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:07 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68326
|
I will never like gays, you are not going to change me. Of course there are gays i do like, but as for the majority, i dislike them.
Adam and Eve NOT Adam and Steve!
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:07 pm |
|
 |
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm Posts: 4684 Location: Toronto
|
neo_wolf wrote: Snrub wrote: [ I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. If MLK ever made clear his objections to homosexuals or homosexual acts (either directly or through his interpretations of the bible) then yes, regardless of the good he did, he was a both a bigot and ignorant. He was a babtis reverand,ever hear a babtis reverand doing his sermon? He preached and believed everything in the bible,if he didnt then why was he a reverand until his death?
I believe in the bible and yet i have totally different view on this subject in comparison to you.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:08 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68326
|
makeshift_wings wrote: Algren wrote: Yes, penetration, you were correct, thats just disgusting. So i'm assuming you find anal sex between a man and a women disgusting too, right? thats fine because its the correct gendersYou also find two women penetrating each other with various objects disgusting, right? that nothing to do with this conversation
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:08 pm |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
neo_wolf wrote: Snrub wrote: [ I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. If MLK ever made clear his objections to homosexuals or homosexual acts (either directly or through his interpretations of the bible) then yes, regardless of the good he did, he was a both a bigot and ignorant. He was a babtis reverand,ever hear a babtis reverand doing his sermon? He preached and believed everything in the bible,if he didnt then why was he a reverand until his death? Snrub wrote: then yes, regardless of the good he did, he was a both a bigot and ignorant.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:08 pm |
|
 |
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm Posts: 4684 Location: Toronto
|
Algren wrote: makeshift_wings wrote: Algren wrote: Yes, penetration, you were correct, thats just disgusting. So i'm assuming you find anal sex between a man and a women disgusting too, right? thats fine because its the correct gendersYou also find two women penetrating each other with various objects disgusting, right? that nothing to do with this conversation
Lesbians are homosexuals 
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:09 pm |
|
 |
Maximus
Hot Fuss
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 am Posts: 8427 Location: floridaaa
|
Algren wrote: I will never like gays, you are not going to change me. Of course there are gays i do like, but as for the majority, i dislike them.
Adam and Eve NOT Adam and Steve!
Nobody is trying to change you. We are trying to tell you that you look like an ass. Atleast admit your logic is flawed. You have NO reason to back up anything, other than the simple fact that your penis likes pussy on pussy, but not cock on cock. You can't love lesbian sex and still hate homosexuality.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:09 pm |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11029
|
neostorm wrote: neo_wolf wrote: Snrub wrote: [ I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. If MLK ever made clear his objections to homosexuals or homosexual acts (either directly or through his interpretations of the bible) then yes, regardless of the good he did, he was a both a bigot and ignorant. He was a babtis reverand,ever hear a babtis reverand doing his sermon? He preached and believed everything in the bible,if he didnt then why was he a reverand until his death? I believe in the bible and yet i have totally different view on this subject in comparison to you.
Ok,have you read my post conserning gay people?Look it up,i dont say anything bad about them.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:10 pm |
|
 |
Bodrul
All Star Poster
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:21 am Posts: 4694 Location: Cambridge, England.
|
Algren wrote: makeshift_wings wrote: Algren wrote: Yes, penetration, you were correct, thats just disgusting. So i'm assuming you find anal sex between a man and a women disgusting too, right? thats fine because its the correct gendersYou also find two women penetrating each other with various objects disgusting, right? that nothing to do with this conversation
hate to break it to ya Algren, lesbians are homosexuals aswell
_________________
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:10 pm |
|
 |
Maximus
Hot Fuss
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 am Posts: 8427 Location: floridaaa
|
Ah. Yes. It has been solved. Algren is so ignorant, he thinks that gay only refers to men on men.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:10 pm |
|
 |
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm Posts: 4684 Location: Toronto
|
neo_wolf wrote: neostorm wrote: neo_wolf wrote: Snrub wrote: [ I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. If MLK ever made clear his objections to homosexuals or homosexual acts (either directly or through his interpretations of the bible) then yes, regardless of the good he did, he was a both a bigot and ignorant. He was a babtis reverand,ever hear a babtis reverand doing his sermon? He preached and believed everything in the bible,if he didnt then why was he a reverand until his death? I believe in the bible and yet i have totally different view on this subject in comparison to you. Ok,have you read my post conserning gay people?Look it up,i dont say anything bad about them.
Yes, but i still dont agree with you  I have a very liberal interpretation of the bible.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:11 pm |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11029
|
Snrub wrote: neo_wolf wrote: Snrub wrote: [ I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. If MLK ever made clear his objections to homosexuals or homosexual acts (either directly or through his interpretations of the bible) then yes, regardless of the good he did, he was a both a bigot and ignorant. He was a babtis reverand,ever hear a babtis reverand doing his sermon? He preached and believed everything in the bible,if he didnt then why was he a reverand until his death? Snrub wrote: then yes, regardless of the good he did, he was a both a bigot and ignorant.
So you think MLK was both a bigot and ignorant huh?
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:12 pm |
|
 |
Tyler
Powered By Hate
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm Posts: 7578 Location: Torrington, CT
|
zach wrote: That is so horribly hillarious.  :wink: Quote: He preached and believed everything in the bible,if he didnt then why was he a reverand until his death? Was he a Jew? (That's a rhetorical question.) The Old Testament is only there for reference on Jesus' teachings, unless you are a Jew, and the OT and NT are like night and day. The NT mentions homosexuality a whopping ONE time--and it's so vague it's debatable on if it IS referencing homosexuality. Quote: I will never like gays, you are not going to change me. Of course there are gays i do like, but as for the majority, i dislike them.
Adam and Eve NOT Adam and Steve!
You know, that IS bigotry. Not liking their preferences is one thing, but not liking them period just for their preferences is bigoted AND unChristian.
_________________ It's my lucky crack pipe.
Last edited by Tyler on Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:12 pm |
|
 |
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
Algren wrote: makeshift_wings wrote: Algren wrote: Yes, penetration, you were correct, thats just disgusting. So i'm assuming you find anal sex between a man and a women disgusting too, right? thats fine because its the correct gendersYou also find two women penetrating each other with various objects disgusting, right? that nothing to do with this conversation
Because it's the correct genders? What if a man has sex with a hermaphrodite that has chosen to live their life as a women?
And how does my latter point have nothing to with the conversation? You said the difference between gay guys having sex and gay women having sex is penetration. Gay women can penetrate, too.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:12 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68326
|
zach wrote: Algren wrote: I will never like gays, you are not going to change me. Of course there are gays i do like, but as for the majority, i dislike them.
Adam and Eve NOT Adam and Steve! Nobody is trying to change you. We are trying to tell you that you look like an ass. Atleast admit your logic is flawed. You have NO reason to back up anything, other than the simple fact that your penis likes pussy on pussy, but not cock on cock. You can't love lesbian sex and still hate homosexuality.
I look like an ass? mate im not the one that had shamed parents.
I dont have to have a reason, because im not trying to convince someone, i have my opinion and thats all i need, gays are vile. Lesbians are alright, but the "homosexuality is a sin" thing still applies.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:12 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68326
|
zach wrote: Ah. Yes. It has been solved. Algren is so ignorant, he thinks that gay only refers to men on men.
No i do not, but I am only reffering this conversation towards men on men, okay?
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:15 pm |
|
 |
Bodrul
All Star Poster
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:21 am Posts: 4694 Location: Cambridge, England.
|
Algren wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: I will never like gays, you are not going to change me. Of course there are gays i do like, but as for the majority, i dislike them.
Adam and Eve NOT Adam and Steve! Nobody is trying to change you. We are trying to tell you that you look like an ass. Atleast admit your logic is flawed. You have NO reason to back up anything, other than the simple fact that your penis likes pussy on pussy, but not cock on cock. You can't love lesbian sex and still hate homosexuality. I look like an ass? mate im not the one that have shamed parents.
ouch!
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:15 pm |
|
 |
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
Algren wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: I will never like gays, you are not going to change me. Of course there are gays i do like, but as for the majority, i dislike them.
Adam and Eve NOT Adam and Steve! Nobody is trying to change you. We are trying to tell you that you look like an ass. Atleast admit your logic is flawed. You have NO reason to back up anything, other than the simple fact that your penis likes pussy on pussy, but not cock on cock. You can't love lesbian sex and still hate homosexuality. I look like an ass? mate im not the one that had shamed parents. I dont have to have a reason, because im not trying to convince someone, i have my opinion and thats all i need, gays are vile. Lesbians are alright, but the "homosexuality is a sin" thing still applies.
There is no difference between the two.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:15 pm |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11029
|
Jon Lyrik wrote: zach wrote: That is so horribly hillarious.  :wink: Quote: He preached and believed everything in the bible,if he didnt then why was he a reverand until his death? Was he a Jew? (That's a rhetorical question.) The Old Testament is only there for reference on Jesus' teachings, unless you are a Jew, and the OT and NT are like night and day. The NT mentions homosexuality a whopping ONE time--and it's so vague it's debatable on if it IS referencing homosexuality. Quote: I will never like gays, you are not going to change me. Of course there are gays i do like, but as for the majority, i dislike them.
Adam and Eve NOT Adam and Steve! You know, that IS bigotry. Not liking their preferences is one thing, but not liking them period just for their preferences is bigoted AND unChristian.
Jesus said he didnt come to change the OT but to Fufill it.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:15 pm |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
neo_wolf wrote: Snrub wrote: neo_wolf wrote: Snrub wrote: [ I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. If MLK ever made clear his objections to homosexuals or homosexual acts (either directly or through his interpretations of the bible) then yes, regardless of the good he did, he was a both a bigot and ignorant. He was a babtis reverand,ever hear a babtis reverand doing his sermon? He preached and believed everything in the bible,if he didnt then why was he a reverand until his death? Snrub wrote: then yes, regardless of the good he did, he was a both a bigot and ignorant. So you think MLK was both a bigot and ignorant huh?
I believe that if MLK said on record that he disapproved of homosexuals or homosexual acts, then yes - he was both a bigot and ignorant.
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:15 pm |
|
 |
Maximus
Hot Fuss
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 am Posts: 8427 Location: floridaaa
|
Algren wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: I will never like gays, you are not going to change me. Of course there are gays i do like, but as for the majority, i dislike them.
Adam and Eve NOT Adam and Steve! Nobody is trying to change you. We are trying to tell you that you look like an ass. Atleast admit your logic is flawed. You have NO reason to back up anything, other than the simple fact that your penis likes pussy on pussy, but not cock on cock. You can't love lesbian sex and still hate homosexuality. I look like an ass? mate im not the one that had shamed parents. I dont have to have a reason, because im not trying to convince someone, i have my opinion and thats all i need, gays are vile. Lesbians are alright, but the "homosexuality is a sin" thing still applies.
I think your parents would be damn ashamed if they knew how ignorant and intolerable you were. OR maybe they are just like you.
My parents are not ashamed of me. I am damn near perfect at everything I do at school and my relationship with my family is very strong. To them, I am nowhere near shame worthy.
But since you seem to be a master at analyzing other people, let me do the same. How does your family feel about you? You are, afterall, a lazy, unemeployed, unattractive, ignorant, and intolerable person. How does your family feel about you being a failure as a human?
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:16 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68326
|
Jon Lyrik wrote: You know, that IS bigotry. Not liking their preferences is one thing, but not liking them period just for their preferences is bigoted AND unChristian.
Who the fuck said i was a christian?
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:16 pm |
|
|