The Presidential Race -- Results in First Post
Author |
Message |
timothy
|
Front page, second major headline of my city's newspaper (Winnipeg Free Press)...
"Bush gets mandate for shift to right
More ambitious, conservative goals expected this term"
And, further in the article...
"So while the president reach out to defeated Democrats in his brief victory remarks yesterday afternoon, his aides and supporters were equally quick to suggest that his bipartisanship might not go far - and that they expect Bush's second term to pursue even more ambitious conservative goals than the first."
MORE AMBITIOUS conservative goals!! AHH!!!!????
Tim
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:35 pm |
|
 |
Coasterman2002
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 6:23 pm Posts: 1010 Location: New Yawk
|
timothy wrote: Front page, second major headline of my city's newspaper (Winnipeg Free Press)...
"Bush gets mandate for shift to right More ambitious, conservative goals expected this term"
And, further in the article...
"So while the president reach out to defeated Democrats in his brief victory remarks yesterday afternoon, his aides and supporters were equally quick to suggest that his bipartisanship might not go far - and that they expect Bush's second term to pursue even more ambitious conservative goals than the first."
MORE AMBITIOUS conservative goals!! AHH!!!!????
Tim
at least hes doing waht the people want from him that voted for him....he shouldnt go more liberal cuz you know waht....liberals didnt vote for him so it should be good that hes going to go more conservative
Timmo
_________________ Michael Savage's "The Savage Nation" On Radio Monday through Friday 8pm-11pm (Eastern Time)
Liberalism is a Mental Disorder - BUY THE BOOK NOW!!! On New York Times Best Seller List 9 Weeks in a Row
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:41 pm |
|
 |
John Doe
The Incredible Hulk
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:44 pm Posts: 571 Location: NYC
|
timothy wrote: Front page, second major headline of my city's newspaper (Winnipeg Free Press)...
"Bush gets mandate for shift to right More ambitious, conservative goals expected this term"
And, further in the article...
"So while the president reach out to defeated Democrats in his brief victory remarks yesterday afternoon, his aides and supporters were equally quick to suggest that his bipartisanship might not go far - and that they expect Bush's second term to pursue even more ambitious conservative goals than the first."
MORE AMBITIOUS conservative goals!! AHH!!!!????
Tim
Luckily, there are people like Arlen Specter in the Senate:
Specter urges caution for Bush
Discourages nominating anti-abortion judges
Thursday, November 4, 2004 Posted: 11:23 AM EST (1623 GMT)
PHILADELPHIA, Pennsylvania (AP) -- The Republican expected to chair the Senate Judiciary Committee next year bluntly warned newly re-elected President Bush on Wednesday against putting forth Supreme Court nominees who would seek to overturn abortion rights or are otherwise too conservative to win confirmation...
READ THE REST HERE...
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:49 pm |
|
 |
Coasterman2002
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 6:23 pm Posts: 1010 Location: New Yawk
|
John Doe wrote: timothy wrote: Front page, second major headline of my city's newspaper (Winnipeg Free Press)...
"Bush gets mandate for shift to right More ambitious, conservative goals expected this term"
And, further in the article...
"So while the president reach out to defeated Democrats in his brief victory remarks yesterday afternoon, his aides and supporters were equally quick to suggest that his bipartisanship might not go far - and that they expect Bush's second term to pursue even more ambitious conservative goals than the first."
MORE AMBITIOUS conservative goals!! AHH!!!!????
Tim Luckily, there are people like Arlen Specter in the Senate: Specter urges caution for BushDiscourages nominating anti-abortion judges Thursday, November 4, 2004 Posted: 11:23 AM EST (1623 GMT) PHILADELPHIA, Pennsylvania (AP) -- The Republican expected to chair the Senate Judiciary Committee next year bluntly warned newly re-elected President Bush on Wednesday against putting forth Supreme Court nominees who would seek to overturn abortion rights or are otherwise too conservative to win confirmation... READ THE REST HERE...
are you pro life and pro abortion?
_________________ Michael Savage's "The Savage Nation" On Radio Monday through Friday 8pm-11pm (Eastern Time)
Liberalism is a Mental Disorder - BUY THE BOOK NOW!!! On New York Times Best Seller List 9 Weeks in a Row
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:50 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
John Doe wrote: timothy wrote: Front page, second major headline of my city's newspaper (Winnipeg Free Press)...
"Bush gets mandate for shift to right More ambitious, conservative goals expected this term"
And, further in the article...
"So while the president reach out to defeated Democrats in his brief victory remarks yesterday afternoon, his aides and supporters were equally quick to suggest that his bipartisanship might not go far - and that they expect Bush's second term to pursue even more ambitious conservative goals than the first."
MORE AMBITIOUS conservative goals!! AHH!!!!????
Tim Luckily, there are people like Arlen Specter in the Senate: Specter urges caution for BushDiscourages nominating anti-abortion judges Thursday, November 4, 2004 Posted: 11:23 AM EST (1623 GMT) PHILADELPHIA, Pennsylvania (AP) -- The Republican expected to chair the Senate Judiciary Committee next year bluntly warned newly re-elected President Bush on Wednesday against putting forth Supreme Court nominees who would seek to overturn abortion rights or are otherwise too conservative to win confirmation... READ THE REST HERE...
Hahahahah
Specter is a menace to Republicans 
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:55 pm |
|
 |
John Doe
The Incredible Hulk
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:44 pm Posts: 571 Location: NYC
|
Krem wrote: Hahahahah Specter is a menace to Republicans 
As I said above, luckily... :wink: :wink: :wink:
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 6:00 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
John Doe wrote: Krem wrote: Hahahahah Specter is a menace to Republicans  As I said above, luckily... :wink: :wink: :wink:
A lot of people around here were pissed off that Bush and Santorum endorsed Specter over Toomey in the primaries.
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 6:02 pm |
|
 |
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
I wonder if they knew Elizabeth had cancer, but decided not to announce it until after the election? I'm not sure if it would hurt them in any way, but it seems kind of strange they both happend within a day of eachother. It is sad that she has cancer, though, but my Aunt had breast cancer, which was diagnosed early, and they were able to treat it. Hopefully this is the same case.
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 6:12 pm |
|
 |
John Doe
The Incredible Hulk
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:44 pm Posts: 571 Location: NYC
|
Coasterman2002 wrote: are you pro life and pro abortion?
I'm for the women's right to choose... with limits on late-term (the last trimester) abortions (but allowing it, if life of a child-bearer is in risk...)
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 6:14 pm |
|
 |
Caius
A very honest-hearted fellow
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm Posts: 4767
|
Krem wrote: John Doe wrote: Krem wrote: Hahahahah Specter is a menace to Republicans  As I said above, luckily... :wink: :wink: :wink: A lot of people around here were pissed off that Bush and Santorum endorsed Specter over Toomey in the primaries.
Told you Spectator is a bum. I've also mentioned before that the bastard knows who really killed Kennedy. Perhaps this actually belongs in a Wertham based thread 
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 6:18 pm |
|
 |
John Doe
The Incredible Hulk
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:44 pm Posts: 571 Location: NYC
|
KidRock69x wrote: Krem wrote: John Doe wrote: Krem wrote: Hahahahah Specter is a menace to Republicans  As I said above, luckily... :wink: :wink: :wink: A lot of people around here were pissed off that Bush and Santorum endorsed Specter over Toomey in the primaries. Told you Spectator is a bum. I've also mentioned before that the bastard knows who really killed Kennedy. Perhaps this actually belongs in a Wertham based thread 
So, how are we going to get him to reveal it... I, for one, would love to know that... :wink:
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 6:21 pm |
|
 |
Caius
A very honest-hearted fellow
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm Posts: 4767
|
Heres a bit about Spector.
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 6:27 pm |
|
 |
John Doe
The Incredible Hulk
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:44 pm Posts: 571 Location: NYC
|
KidRock69x wrote: Heres a bit about Spector.
Thanks, didn't know he was on the commitee (but the Warren Report doesn't reveal anything "conspiration-worthy"...  )
On another note: What is it with these RINO (Republican-In-Name-Only)s and DINOs??? Do you know Senators/Congressmen being labeled as such???
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 6:55 pm |
|
 |
Caius
A very honest-hearted fellow
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm Posts: 4767
|
John Doe wrote: KidRock69x wrote: Heres a bit about Spector. Thanks, didn't know he was on the commitee (but the Warren Report doesn't reveal anything "conspiration-worthy"...  ) On another note: What is it with these RINO (Republican-In-Name-Only)s and DINOs??? Do you know Senators/Congressmen being labeled as such???
Its not used as much in the House. But here are a few
RINO's= Areln Spector, Lincoln Chafee and Olmpia Snow.
DINO's= Joe Lieberman, Zell Miller
You can debate whtether or not these labels are true and whether more should be added, but these guys usually get the labels.
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:22 pm |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11029
|
Anyone see michael moore's first thoughts after the election?
http://www.michaelmoore.com/
he acts like its the end of the world. 
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:30 pm |
|
 |
Rod
Extra on the Ordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:50 pm Posts: 12821
|
Coasterman2002 wrote: timothy wrote: Front page, second major headline of my city's newspaper (Winnipeg Free Press)...
"Bush gets mandate for shift to right More ambitious, conservative goals expected this term"
And, further in the article...
"So while the president reach out to defeated Democrats in his brief victory remarks yesterday afternoon, his aides and supporters were equally quick to suggest that his bipartisanship might not go far - and that they expect Bush's second term to pursue even more ambitious conservative goals than the first."
MORE AMBITIOUS conservative goals!! AHH!!!!????
Tim at least hes doing waht the people want from him that voted for him....he shouldnt go more liberal cuz you know waht....liberals didnt vote for him so it should be good that hes going to go more conservative Timmo
So basically you're saying the president has no obligation with 200+ million people in this country since they did not vote for him anyway and he should only be concerned with the 60 or so million that did. Way to bring the country together and pull it ahead.
Honestly, that's just stupid.,
And I'm realllly not purposely picking on your posts. Just, ugh, you make it so easy.
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:34 pm |
|
 |
Rod
Extra on the Ordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:50 pm Posts: 12821
|
Coasterman2002 wrote: timothy wrote: Front page, second major headline of my city's newspaper (Winnipeg Free Press)...
"Bush gets mandate for shift to right More ambitious, conservative goals expected this term"
And, further in the article...
"So while the president reach out to defeated Democrats in his brief victory remarks yesterday afternoon, his aides and supporters were equally quick to suggest that his bipartisanship might not go far - and that they expect Bush's second term to pursue even more ambitious conservative goals than the first."
MORE AMBITIOUS conservative goals!! AHH!!!!????
Tim at least hes doing waht the people want from him that voted for him....he shouldnt go more liberal cuz you know waht....liberals didnt vote for him so it should be good that hes going to go more conservative Timmo
So basically you're saying the president has no obligation with 200+ million people in this country since they did not vote for him anyway and he should only be concerned with the 60 or so million that did. Way to bring the country together and pull it ahead.
Honestly, that's just stupid.,
And I'm realllly not purposely picking on your posts. Just, ugh, you make it so easy.
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:34 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
neo_wolf wrote: Anyone see michael moore's first thoughts after the election? http://www.michaelmoore.com/he acts like its the end of the world. 
Michael Mooreon.
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:41 pm |
|
 |
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Krem wrote: neo_wolf wrote: Anyone see michael moore's first thoughts after the election? http://www.michaelmoore.com/he acts like its the end of the world.  Michael Mooreon.
Agreed. 
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:45 pm |
|
 |
Coasterman2002
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 6:23 pm Posts: 1010 Location: New Yawk
|
Rod wrote: Coasterman2002 wrote: timothy wrote: Front page, second major headline of my city's newspaper (Winnipeg Free Press)...
"Bush gets mandate for shift to right More ambitious, conservative goals expected this term"
And, further in the article...
"So while the president reach out to defeated Democrats in his brief victory remarks yesterday afternoon, his aides and supporters were equally quick to suggest that his bipartisanship might not go far - and that they expect Bush's second term to pursue even more ambitious conservative goals than the first."
MORE AMBITIOUS conservative goals!! AHH!!!!????
Tim at least hes doing waht the people want from him that voted for him....he shouldnt go more liberal cuz you know waht....liberals didnt vote for him so it should be good that hes going to go more conservative Timmo So basically you're saying the president has no obligation with 200+ million people in this country since they did not vote for him anyway and he should only be concerned with the 60 or so million that did. Way to bring the country together and pull it ahead. Honestly, that's just stupid., And I'm realllly not purposely picking on your posts. Just, ugh, you make it so easy.
then you know what then they shoudl of voted...i know it sounds simple because it is .....i fthere could of been 200 million people voted you said then where were they.....i'm just saying bush won and the peopel who voted for him want him to live up to the expectations....ok back up the liberals...i have no prob with that but they ddint show up in this election enough to make kerry the president
_________________ Michael Savage's "The Savage Nation" On Radio Monday through Friday 8pm-11pm (Eastern Time)
Liberalism is a Mental Disorder - BUY THE BOOK NOW!!! On New York Times Best Seller List 9 Weeks in a Row
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:57 pm |
|
 |
Coasterman2002
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 6:23 pm Posts: 1010 Location: New Yawk
|
and Rod...i really dont mind you defending your position and attacking mine cuz thats the beauty of having opinions...no harm in this
_________________ Michael Savage's "The Savage Nation" On Radio Monday through Friday 8pm-11pm (Eastern Time)
Liberalism is a Mental Disorder - BUY THE BOOK NOW!!! On New York Times Best Seller List 9 Weeks in a Row
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:59 pm |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
Not for sensitive republican eyes, but everyone else will probably get a chuckle here: http://joi.ito.com/archives/2004/11/04/ ... humor.html
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:17 pm |
|
 |
Caius
A very honest-hearted fellow
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm Posts: 4767
|
I read this after receiving a link from my esteemed collegue Krem. Actually Archie, it PROVES theres a liberal media bias :wink:
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:22 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Hehe
For a moment I almost believed it.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 10:02 pm |
|
 |
dolcevita
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm Posts: 16061 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
KidRock69x wrote: I read this after receiving a link from my esteemed collegue Krem. Actually Archie, it PROVES theres a liberal media bias :wink:
Nah. It just proves that there is one damn bitter internet photo layout editor.
-Dolce
|
Thu Nov 04, 2004 10:06 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|