Author |
Message |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Token Brown Dude wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: I am concerned by already 4 people having voted "yes" :? and thats what bothers me lecter .. people who actually feel this way yet haven't owned up to it at all ... i tell you if I was face to face with them, they wouldn't say anything ... how am I to make an effort to make someone think otherwise if I can't even identify who the person is? I'll be honest. If I lived in the USA, was exposed to some media propaganda and didn't know any Muslims personally, I think that my mind might have gone in a similar direction. But it's not like that. There are bad people in all religions and races. The end. No point to discuss here.
yes, but then the society itself criticizes us from discriminating in the first place .... it leads to a state of confusion ... peopel who feel a certain way, yet not owning up for it .. like i said, the feeling is understandable in my view though and you're completely right ... i would feel the same....
I mean thats how people back home feel about homosexuals and i've got some hilarious (or disturbing the way you wanna look at) about perceptions of the black population.
|
Sun Dec 19, 2004 12:14 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
To be fair, the study itself is guilty of mudding the water with its definitions.
For instance, they're defining FBI agents infiltrating mosques and other Muslim organization to gather intelligence as infringing on civil liberties.
That's bullshit. I'd be surprised if the FBI WASN'T doing that.
|
Sun Dec 19, 2004 12:16 pm |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
Krem wrote: To be fair, the study itself is guilty of mudding the water with its definitions.
For instance, they're defining FBI agents infiltrating mosques and other Muslim organization to gather intelligence as infringing on civil liberties.
That's bullshit. I'd be surprised if the FBI WASN'T doing that.
Exactly. Which is why I was one of the 4 who voted yes. But of course I'd be against anything harsh or really infringing on civil liberties. But a few minor measures need to be taken.
I'd rather they do some preventive stuff like that, than what they already do which was round people up in the hundreds and hold them with no court or lawyer or anyone who can meet them for months and in some cases years. That bothered me bad. In fact the treatment of prisoners in general, whether people being questioned in the US or held in Gitmo, was one of the main gut things for me about this last election.
And the survey said republicans and people who describe themselves as very religious were more likely to want curtailing. Translation: old folks are more scared. Is that a surprise?
|
Sun Dec 19, 2004 12:59 pm |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
Actually at first I voted yes just to be a smartass even though I was against it. But then I read the fine print like Krem did and started realizing the poll was probably created just to stir up crap. :wink:
And I dispute the idea that Canadian cities are more minority and immigrant than U.S. ones are. Do you imagine that places like Dallas and Houston are full of white cowboy types? They are like 75%+ minority and immigrant, and that's in the heart of Texas, Bush country. Other cities are more so.
|
Sun Dec 19, 2004 1:08 pm |
|
 |
Ripper
2.71828183
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm Posts: 7827 Location: please delete me
|
Krem wrote: To be fair, the study itself is guilty of mudding the water with its definitions.
For instance, they're defining FBI agents infiltrating mosques and other Muslim organization to gather intelligence as infringing on civil liberties.
That's bullshit. I'd be surprised if the FBI WASN'T doing that.
I wouldn't be surprised if the FBi wasn;t doing that due to lack of personal, but yes undercover FBI agents gethering evidence in mosques is their job and not the same as rounging up Msulims to live in the hell hole that is Oklahoma.
|
Sun Dec 19, 2004 1:12 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
Archie Gates wrote: Actually at first I voted yes just to be a smartass even though I was against it. But then I read the fine print like Krem did and started realizing the poll was probably created just to stir up crap. :wink:
And I dispute the idea that Canadian cities are more minority and immigrant than U.S. ones are. Do you imagine that places like Dallas and Houston are full of white cowboy types? They are like 75%+ minority and immigrant, and that's in the heart of Texas, Bush country. Other cities are more so.
Places like Dallas n all are dominated by a few minorities ... its minority may be a majority there yes but its not like they see a lot of everything ..
come here to montreal ... name a minority, we got it ... we got it in huuuuuuuuuge numbers!! the issue isnt what race someone belongs to here, its what language they'll respond in : )
|
Sun Dec 19, 2004 1:43 pm |
|
 |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
Archie Gates wrote: And I dispute the idea that Canadian cities are more minority and immigrant than U.S. ones are. Do you imagine that places like Dallas and Houston are full of white cowboy types? They are like 75%+ minority and immigrant, and that's in the heart of Texas, Bush country. Other cities are more so.
60% of Toronto's population is born outside of Canada. If you consider that those have relatives born here, including kids , I'd say less than 20%, maybe 15% of this city's population is non-immigrant white. Whites are actually the minority
156 languages are spoken here as mothertongues as well. It is ridiculously diverse. And I love it for that!
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Sun Dec 19, 2004 1:48 pm |
|
 |
Beeblebrox
All Star Poster
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm Posts: 4679
|
Coasterman2002 wrote: yeah but say if christian groups pay for something like that do you think they'll allow only christians in and not atheists, jewish, muslims
Disney actually hosts just that kind of event for Christians. I know because I went to one. The attendees are not decided by the theme park. They are picked by the event sponsor, and the event sponsor can sell tickets to anyone they want or exclude anyone they want.
|
Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:42 pm |
|
 |
Beeblebrox
All Star Poster
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm Posts: 4679
|
Krem wrote: For instance, they're defining FBI agents infiltrating mosques and other Muslim organization to gather intelligence as infringing on civil liberties.
I consider that an invasion of privacy and an infringement of civil liberty. And I'm sure you would to if they targeted you for investigation for no other reason than your ethnicity. We are supposed to have Constitutional protections against just that sort of thing.
Of course, to be fair, they are also targetting potential terror organizations... like peace protesting college students and Quakers. So it's a good use of FBI time all around.
Small govt advocates, my ass.
|
Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:49 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
Beeblebrox wrote: Krem wrote: For instance, they're defining FBI agents infiltrating mosques and other Muslim organization to gather intelligence as infringing on civil liberties. I consider that an invasion of privacy and an infringement of civil liberty. And I'm sure you would to if they targeted you for investigation for no other reason than your ethnicity. We are supposed to have Constitutional protections against just that sort of thing. Of course, to be fair, they are also targetting potential terror organizations... like peace protesting college students and Quakers. So it's a good use of FBI time all around. Small govt advocates, my ass.
Oh, please. There is nothing wrong with trying to gather intelligence by infiltrating groups that have potential ties to terrorism. Whose civil liberties are infringed?
|
Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:10 pm |
|
 |
Rod
Extra on the Ordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:50 pm Posts: 12821
|
...which is why you shouldn't necessarily go with what the majority thinks in the country (though it is not a majority as of now)...
It's sad to see so much ignorance.
_________________ Best Actress 2008
|
Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:12 pm |
|
 |
Rod
Extra on the Ordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:50 pm Posts: 12821
|
Archie Gates wrote: Ok lets get this in perspective. Of course a majority are for curtailing some Muslim American rights, a majority are for curtailing everyone's rights otherwise George Patriot Act Bush wouldn't have got reelected. But when it breaks down into specifics it turns out only a small percentage are for specific things like registering. And keep in mind that 39% of American men and 30% of American women believe in UFOs. So at least less believe in registering Muslims than believe in UFOs, that's not so bad. 
But UFOs, by definition, do exist
And so does life outside this planet :wink:
_________________ Best Actress 2008
|
Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:15 pm |
|
 |
lovemerox
Forum General
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm Posts: 6499 Location: Down along the dixie line
|
This saddens me. They should check everyone...because we all know white caucasians are just as fucked up as anyone.
Im really interested in who chose "yes" and would like to hear their opinions on the matter.
_________________
|
Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:24 pm |
|
 |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
lovemerox wrote: This saddens me. They should check everyone...because we all know white caucasians are just as fucked up as anyone. Im really interested in who chose "yes" and would like to hear their opinions on the matter.
If I were a terrorist, I'd hire disillusioned White Americans and Europeans to carry out the act, scare the living daylight out of the US that way.
Then it wont be, "they vs. us", but " they among us vs. us"
Freaky...
But I don't wish that on anyone. That'd be horrible.
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Mon Dec 20, 2004 12:42 am |
|
|