| Author |
Message |
|
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22199
Location: Places
|
 Re: Super Bowl DP07 wrote: Payton still set the SB record for comps. Because he was down big and forced to abandon the run & was constantly checking down.  You guys need to learn to read into the statistics. _________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
| Mon Feb 03, 2014 11:49 am |
|
|
|
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
|
Re: Super Bowl Beyonce should be the halftime guest every year
|
| Mon Feb 03, 2014 1:10 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: Super Bowl I will tweet it all the time. Just get the fucking Foo Fighters to do the halftime show. They're a band that most everyone likes, won't enrage any demo and will put on a hell of a show.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Mon Feb 03, 2014 1:33 pm |
|
|
|
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21230
Location: Massachusetts
|
Re: Super Bowl Magnus wrote: with regards to the commericals....I think internet is sort of killing the Superbowl Ad. I can't really explain it or justify this to be true, but I really feel that the quality of the ads has been consistently dropping in the last 8 years or so since the YouTube/social media boom.
The only rationale I can think is that there's less pressure because you don't need a home run anymore as people will go online to watch the commericals even if they're not amazing. It also doesn't help that the companies who made the commercials are releasing them online a week in advance. That'll keep happening too if the cost to air them doesn't come down. _________________My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
| Mon Feb 03, 2014 1:45 pm |
|
|
|
Mau
100% That Bitch
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:42 pm
Posts: 16923
Location: Monterrey, Mexico
|
Re: Super Bowl Pink would give a hell of a halftime show.
_________________
Tongue Pop!
I kneel with Magnus.
|
| Mon Feb 03, 2014 2:07 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: Super Bowl That we have already seen at every awards show over the last 5+ years...
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Mon Feb 03, 2014 2:07 pm |
|
|
|
Mau
100% That Bitch
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:42 pm
Posts: 16923
Location: Monterrey, Mexico
|
Re: Super Bowl Still better than Taylor Swift "singing" for 15 minutes
_________________
Tongue Pop!
I kneel with Magnus.
|
| Mon Feb 03, 2014 2:12 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: Super Bowl T-Sizzle is better on the eyes.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Mon Feb 03, 2014 2:14 pm |
|
|
|
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22199
Location: Places
|
Re: Super Bowl Jay-z and Linkin Park.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
| Mon Feb 03, 2014 2:44 pm |
|
|
|
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
|
Re: Super Bowl The one oddity about the superbowl ... they don't pay the performer. They maintain the exposure is payment enough, it could limit their options ... maybe?
_________________
|
| Mon Feb 03, 2014 3:48 pm |
|
|
|
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22199
Location: Places
|
Re: Super Bowl Magnus wrote: If they were gonna do Jay-Z, this year would have been it with it being close to New York. I know. I was hopeful. Bruno Mars did pretty well though. _________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
| Mon Feb 03, 2014 4:13 pm |
|
|
|
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22199
Location: Places
|
Re: Super Bowl btw bruno KILLED it
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
| Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:38 pm |
|
|
|
Floydboy
ha ha, charade you are
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:05 pm
Posts: 2210
|
Re: Super Bowl Still trying to get over the brutal loss. I feel the same way I did when Montana beat Elway so badly. I had a Super Bowl party and it didn't go very well (obviously).
We just looked unprepared.
_________________
Floydboy
|
| Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:00 am |
|
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68341
|
Re: Super Bowl Eagle wrote: The one oddity about the superbowl ... they don't pay the performer. They maintain the exposure is payment enough Kind of true, though, and I agree. _________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
| Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:34 am |
|
|
|
BJ
Killing With Kindness
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
|
Re: Super Bowl Floydboy wrote: Still trying to get over the brutal loss. I feel the same way I did when Montana beat Elway so badly. I had a Super Bowl party and it didn't go very well (obviously).
We just looked unprepared. Though I went Hawks, I think the biggest issue for Denver was the crowd noise, they admitted it was unexpected and they never appeared to adjust to it, Seattle just ate it up and used it to pump em up. That was definitely one of the loudest super bowls i have watched. I think the outcome would have been much different with a more subdued crowd. _________________The Force Awakens
|
| Tue Feb 04, 2014 9:48 am |
|
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68341
|
Re: Super Bowl Magnus wrote: with regards to the commericals....I think internet is sort of killing the Superbowl Ad. I can't really explain it or justify this to be true, but I really feel that the quality of the ads has been consistently dropping in the last 8 years or so since the YouTube/social media boom.
The only rationale I can think is that there's less pressure because you don't need a home run anymore as people will go online to watch the commericals even if they're not amazing. But this gives the commercials more exposure, which is good for the studios buying the slot. More eyes see it. _________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
| Tue Feb 04, 2014 12:47 pm |
|
|
