Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Nov 10, 2024 3:45 pm



Reply to topic  [ 175 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
 DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman) 
Author Message
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 22923
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
Algren wrote:
Just check Dwayne's social media. All he cares about is building his brand as a loving and gentle family man. I much prefer the Dwayne of 2003, even if his films were smaller, they were better. I'll take The Rundown and Walking Tall over crap like Skyscraper, Central Intelligence and Red Notice any day of the week!


Yes 100%

The Rock of today is a walking brand. The Rundown (aka Welcome to the Jungle) was fun and Walking Tall was good as well.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:37 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 39143
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
The Rock is best as supporting actor to me. He has no classic movies as a lead but that's half action movies not being as popular as they were.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:10 pm
Profile
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22116
Location: Places
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
Not to play devils advocate but it needs to be said:

Black Adam making $67m on opening weekend, in hindsight, is fucking excellent and a huge testament to the power of The Rock. Black Adam is an absolute no name hero with zero drawing power. It was 100% sold on The Rock.

This isn't 2016. DC isn't fresh and theaters are still largely recovering from Covid. In 2019. if one had said film 1 for BLACK ADAM will make exactly 50% of what THE BATMAN makes, most would have said that was a very solid, borderline great, performance for film 1. DC is walking away from a serious box office draw if they truly move on from him.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:39 pm
Profile
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32401
Location: the last free city
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
Algren wrote:
I much prefer the Dwayne of 2003, even if his films were smaller, they were better. I'll take The Rundown and Walking Tall over crap like Skyscraper, Central Intelligence and Red Notice any day of the week!


Same!!!! back when he was actually trying to act

_________________
Is it 2024 yet?


Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:49 pm
Profile
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 22923
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
Excel wrote:
Not to play devils advocate but it needs to be said:

Black Adam making $67m on opening weekend, in hindsight, is fucking excellent and a huge testament to the power of The Rock. Black Adam is an absolute no name hero with zero drawing power. It was 100% sold on The Rock.

This isn't 2016. DC isn't fresh and theaters are still largely recovering from Covid. In 2019. if one had said film 1 for BLACK ADAM will make exactly 50% of what THE BATMAN makes, most would have said that was a very solid, borderline great, performance for film 1. DC is walking away from a serious box office draw if they truly move on from him.


I actually thought Black Adam did reasonably well. Never expected $200m+ for it.

Unfortunately, it's budget was too high however.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:34 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:53 pm
Posts: 11858
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
I agree on The Rock taking overly safe routes now but his salary is astronomically higher and the audience has been pretty consistent with him.

Red Notice was very bad but if Netflix is throwing a $200M budget and paying The Rock, Ryan Reynolds, and Gal Gadot $20M each if we were in that position would you say no?


Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:36 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am
Posts: 19202
Location: San Diego
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
Yeah Black Adam's opening was solid, idk why people were saying it wasn't good.


Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:30 am
Profile
Wall-E

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 1:44 pm
Posts: 876
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
publicenemy#1 wrote:
Yeah Black Adam's opening was solid, idk why people were saying it wasn't good.

57M OW for a 200M budget film is just not good enough. Of course whether the film itself was at fault or it was a classic case of WB budgets being insane is entirely debatable.


Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:43 am
Profile
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 67719
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
Shack wrote:
The Rock is best as supporting actor to me. He has no classic movies as a lead but that's half action movies not being as popular as they were.


Yeah, kind of. He was good in Be Cool and Fast Five, but I like him too much in The Rundown and Walking Tall to say he's better as a support act.

It is quite a fail that he has no classic films, though. I hadn't pondered it before but it's true, lol. They're all forgettable popcorn fare. I'd even argue that his most iconic film or role is probably still The Mummy Returns, lol.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Thu Mar 23, 2023 8:10 am
Profile WWW
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32401
Location: the last free city
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
JustLurking wrote:
publicenemy#1 wrote:
Yeah Black Adam's opening was solid, idk why people were saying it wasn't good.

57M OW for a 200M budget film is just not good enough. Of course whether the film itself was at fault or it was a classic case of WB budgets being insane is entirely debatable.


Umm actually :emo: it opened to $67m
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/release/r ... bo_tt_gr_1

but your point stands :lol: not good enough

_________________
Is it 2024 yet?


Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:12 am
Profile
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22116
Location: Places
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
we all need to bring out standards back to 2004.

$67m is big weekend no doubt about it. Cavill Superman vs Black Adam would have been a big hit.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:50 pm
Profile
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 67719
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
Image

This shows the trajectory of DC. The more recent films are in the bottom half.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Fri Mar 31, 2023 6:17 pm
Profile WWW
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32401
Location: the last free city
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
Algren wrote:
Image

This shows the trajectory of DC. The more recent films are in the bottom half.


AQUAMAN :1st: :lol: crazy!

_________________
Is it 2024 yet?


Fri Mar 31, 2023 6:50 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 39143
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
750 mil for Suicide Squad for one of the worst superhero movies of this era is crazy

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:27 pm
Profile
llegó a la casa vía marítima
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 6250
Location: la gran casa de la esquina
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
The way WW84 destroyed its franchise is crazy. Reminds of how Prince Caspian shockingly flopped and derailed Narnia after everyone thought it was the next big thing.

_________________
.


Sat Apr 01, 2023 5:48 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am
Posts: 19202
Location: San Diego
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
Suicide Squad ad campaign was truly one of the best ever. Had they released a better version of the movie it'd probably do closer to a billion.

WW1984 with no pandemic would've opened huge still.


Sat Apr 01, 2023 6:04 am
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21780
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
Yeah WB killed WW and streamed it same time as Justice League Snyder cut. They should have ate it and moved it summer 21 like Bond which still did nearly 800 million at the end of the day. WW in summer 21 probably would have at least done 550+Ww

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Sat Apr 01, 2023 9:32 am
Profile
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 22923
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
WW1984 - shockingly bad decision making from WB - even by their poor standard.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Mon Apr 03, 2023 2:20 am
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21780
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
Blue Beetle looks surprisingly good, looks better than Black atom and the first shazam

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Mon Apr 03, 2023 5:31 pm
Profile
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 3181
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
The comments under Blue Beetle’s trailer on YT appear to be written by studio plants. Not only because they are overwhelmingly positive and enthusiastic but they read artificial and contrived. It’s probably a covert campaign by the marketing department to drum up support for the movie.

_________________
I believe in God as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.

I was blind, but now I see.


Tue Apr 04, 2023 1:24 am
Profile
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 67719
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
Wasted money there then. Does anyone even read YouTube comments? I may read one if I want clarification on an issue or topic within a video, but for a trailer to see what people thought? ain't nobody got time for dat

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Tue Apr 04, 2023 4:56 pm
Profile WWW
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21780
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
I think the online response is good, there are bots on every trailer, but I haven’t seen anyone react badly to it yet. It kind of looks like the freshest superhero movie in a while

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Tue Apr 04, 2023 6:41 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 39143
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
Blue Beetle will probably get good reviews based on it being the first latin superhero.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Tue Apr 04, 2023 6:48 pm
Profile
Online
Hold the door!

Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm
Posts: 20745
Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
The Flash social media reactions are very positive. I wonder when professional reviews will be up.


Tue Apr 25, 2023 10:55 pm
Profile
Ocarina of Time
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 1:21 pm
Posts: 7951
Location: Hyrule
Post Re: DC 2023 discussion (Gunn directing Superman)
lol at how people still care for critics’ opinions :funny: however it’s good to see so much praise for this movie, still sad they’re “rebooting” all with Gunn’s toilet joke universe, I’m hoping to be proven wrong though!

_________________
Most Anticipated 2023

1. Super Mario Bros Movie
2. Rebel Moon
3. Mission Impossible Dead Reckoning Part 1
4. Oppenheimer
5. The Flash
6. Elemental
7. Aquaman 2
8. Dune Part 2
9. Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny
10. Blue Beetle


Wed Apr 26, 2023 12:35 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 175 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.