$191,351,698
| World of KJ https://worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| superman returns predictons https://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=13108 |
Page 136 of 138 |
| Author: | Excel [ Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
even SHACK said it had a terrific tv spot campaign and he had "realized it will get 200 million but wont admit due to pride". |
|
| Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
excel wrote: even SHACK said it had a terrific tv spot campaign and he had "realized it will get 200 million but wont admit due to pride". Well...it didn't get $200 million... |
|
| Author: | zingy [ Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
excel, you've yet to realize (and you probably never will) that awareness does not equal interest. Just because there was a lot of marketing doesn't mean WB made people CARE about the god damn film. |
|
| Author: | Excel [ Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
ive realized; hence why i thin batman 2 will be huge n matter how fucked up the marketing is by wb |
|
| Author: | Rev [ Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
$191,351,698
|
|
| Author: | STEVE ROGERS [ Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Magnus wrote: I have to admit, you guys are picking on excel more than he deserves. And?? Your Point?? 
|
|
| Author: | zingy [ Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
MIAMI_BKB wrote: Magnus wrote: I have to admit, you guys are picking on excel more than he deserves. And?? Your Point?? 
BKB has spoken. excel deserves it. At least until it comes out on DVD. |
|
| Author: | STEVE ROGERS [ Sat Aug 12, 2006 7:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Zingaling wrote: excel, you've yet to realize (and you probably never will) that awareness does not equal interest. Just because there was a lot of marketing doesn't mean WB made people CARE about the god damn film. Are we still going on and on about this movie??? Zing's right: WB did a shi**y job in getting moviegoers to care about this character.. It's OVER Excel.. OVER |
|
| Author: | zingy [ Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
My dad got me a Superman t-shirt (the "S" one) from his trip to Las Vegas, and he said it was the last one. It looks like $200m is still in the cards for Supes. +500% this weekend. |
|
| Author: | Excel [ Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
fool. +1000% |
|
| Author: | Excel [ Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
MIAMI_BKB wrote: Magnus wrote: I have to admit, you guys are picking on excel more than he deserves. And?? Your Point?? your a bitch  
|
|
| Author: | zingy [ Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Wednesday: $1.08m (+500%) Thursday: $6.48m (+500%) Friday: $38.9m (+500%) Saturday: $48.6m (+25%) Sunday: $36.4m (-25%) |
|
| Author: | Erendis [ Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Don't blame the failure just on Warner Brothers. Some of the fault lies directly with the Singer and the writers, and the people who thought there was demand for Superman when there wasn't. If Superman had been something that the general public wanted to see, there would have been better WOM. WOM trumps marketing. Oh, and it would have helped if Superman was released a month after Pirates instead of a week before. |
|
| Author: | lesterg [ Thu Aug 17, 2006 11:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Zingaling wrote: My dad got me a Superman t-shirt (the "S" one) from his trip to Las Vegas, and he said it was the last one. It looks like $200m is still in the cards for Supes. +500% this weekend. LOL. glad to see this thread back to life. Even Google is getting snarky about Superman's box-office... 
|
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Bad WOM?! It has over a 3 multiplier for it's 5 day weekend!!! That's pretty damn good if you ask me. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
WoM was not bad. Just average. |
|
| Author: | El Maskado [ Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
lesterg wrote: LOL. glad to see this thread back to life. Even Google is getting snarky about Superman's box-office... That pic gave me a laugh. I did try and google it but it did give me results so that picture has to be faked. It would have been much funnier if it was true |
|
| Author: | STEVE ROGERS [ Thu Aug 17, 2006 11:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
excel wrote: MIAMI_BKB wrote: Magnus wrote: I have to admit, you guys are picking on excel more than he deserves. And?? Your Point?? your a bitch Your MY Bitch.. Now go fetch me a Beer and my slippers.. |
|
| Author: | Excel [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 1:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
| nigga nobodys bitch
|
|
| Author: | Rev [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Source Quote: It hasn't helped Warner that none of the six profitable movies it has released this year  including "V for Vendetta" and "Superman Returns"  has been a blockbuster. Horn said the half-dozen would make "from a lot to a little" money. Horn declined to divulge figures, but a person familiar with the studio's internal projections said Warner's cut of the "Superman Returns" profit was expected to be $50 million to $60 million. The film cost $209 million to produce and more than $100 million to market worldwide. Horn expects "Superman Returns" to eventually gross about $400 million worldwide, more than last year's hit "Batman Begins." Nonetheless, "Superman" fell at least $100 million short of his expectations. "I thought it was a very successful movie, but I think it should have done $500 million worldwide," Horn said. "We should have had perhaps a little more action to satisfy the young male crowd." Still, he's betting Warner has firmly reestablished the "Superman" franchise and is planning another installment for summer 2009. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
revolutions wrote: Source Quote: It hasn't helped Warner that none of the six profitable movies it has released this year  including "V for Vendetta" and "Superman Returns"  has been a blockbuster. Horn said the half-dozen would make "from a lot to a little" money. Horn declined to divulge figures, but a person familiar with the studio's internal projections said Warner's cut of the "Superman Returns" profit was expected to be $50 million to $60 million. The film cost $209 million to produce and more than $100 million to market worldwide. Horn expects "Superman Returns" to eventually gross about $400 million worldwide, more than last year's hit "Batman Begins." Nonetheless, "Superman" fell at least $100 million short of his expectations. "I thought it was a very successful movie, but I think it should have done $500 million worldwide," Horn said. "We should have had perhaps a little more action to satisfy the young male crowd." Still, he's betting Warner has firmly reestablished the "Superman" franchise and is planning another installment for summer 2009. Well, he's obviously a genius. |
|
| Author: | Nazgul9 [ Sat Aug 19, 2006 4:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Looks like a lot more than $1 profit for Warner... 
|
|
| Author: | Excel [ Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dr. Lecter wrote: revolutions wrote: Source Quote: It hasn't helped Warner that none of the six profitable movies it has released this year  including "V for Vendetta" and "Superman Returns"  has been a blockbuster. Horn said the half-dozen would make "from a lot to a little" money. Horn declined to divulge figures, but a person familiar with the studio's internal projections said Warner's cut of the "Superman Returns" profit was expected to be $50 million to $60 million. The film cost $209 million to produce and more than $100 million to market worldwide. Horn expects "Superman Returns" to eventually gross about $400 million worldwide, more than last year's hit "Batman Begins." Nonetheless, "Superman" fell at least $100 million short of his expectations. "I thought it was a very successful movie, but I think it should have done $500 million worldwide," Horn said. "We should have had perhaps a little more action to satisfy the young male crowd." Still, he's betting Warner has firmly reestablished the "Superman" franchise and is planning another installment for summer 2009. Well, he's obviously a genius. for giving his director creative control? yes. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Nazgul9 wrote: Looks like a lot more than $1 profit for Warner... I think you misread the article, heh. Well you actually didn't, it was them who worded it poorly. Or do you really expect WB to make $60 million profit with $300+ million overall costs as stated in the article? heh If they were talking real profit they wouldn't have said "WB's cut of the profit" |
|
| Author: | Libs [ Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I am so proud of the "I think it will fall short with somewhere between $185-195 million" prediction I made. I don't feel like I'm ever right about these kinds of movies, so it was nice...to be right. |
|
| Page 136 of 138 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|