World of KJ http://worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
Thursday (3/17) Ratings http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=5624 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Libs [ Fri Mar 18, 2005 3:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Thursday (3/17) Ratings |
1. "The Apprentice" (NBC) - 9.4/14 2. "ER" (R, NBC) - 7.7/13 3. "Will & Grace" (NBC) - 7.6/12 4. "Primetime Live" (ABC) - 7.4/12 5. "NCAA Basektball" (CBS) - 6.6/10 6. "Jake in Progress" (ABC) - 5.7/9 7. "The O.C." (FOX) - 5.6/9 8. "Jeff Foxworthy: The Early Daze" (WB) - 3.9/6 9. "WWE Smackdown!" (UPN) - 3.8/6 10. "Point Pleasant" (FOX) - 3.0/5 11. "The Starlet" (R, WB) - 1.9/3 Source: http://www.mediaweek.com |
Author: | Libs [ Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Very unpromising for Jake in Progress. The fact that it could only pull those ratings off with the absence of Joey/Survivor is not a good sign for longevity. |
Author: | Maverikk [ Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Libs wrote: Very unpromising for Jake in Progress. The fact that it could only pull those ratings off with the absence of Joey/Survivor is not a good sign for longevity. I actually tuned in , but wasn't expecting a marathon of the show. It was overkill, and running 4 strait episodes of a show making it's debut was not so smart. I lost interest by the 3rd one. I didn't feel it was really well written, and the comedy wasn't exactly funny or anything. I have a feeling he'll be back to playing the house husband while his wife makes the money soon enough. |
Author: | Libs [ Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Maverikk wrote: Libs wrote: Very unpromising for Jake in Progress. The fact that it could only pull those ratings off with the absence of Joey/Survivor is not a good sign for longevity. I actually tuned in , but wasn't expecting a marathon of the show. It was overkill, and running 4 strait episodes of a show making it's debut was not so smart. I lost interest by the 3rd one. I didn't feel it was really well written, and the comedy wasn't exactly funny or anything. I have a feeling he'll be back to playing the house husband while his wife makes the money soon enough. 2 notes: A) Only two of the episodes were new, it had a "sneak preview" last Sunday so the 2nd hour were repeats B) John Stamos and Rebecca Romijn are no longer married Heh. :wink: |
Author: | Maverikk [ Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Libs wrote: 2 notes: A) Only two of the episodes were new, it had a "sneak preview" last Sunday so the 2nd hour were repeats B) John Stamos and Rebecca Romijn are no longer married Heh. :wink: #-o I wasn't aware of their divorce. In that case, I hope he's still getting royalties of some kind from syndication deals with Full House, because I don't see this show being a big success. *walks away feeling really dumb for not having facts strait the first time* |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |