World of KJ :: View topic - The "Brothers & Sisters" Thread (Season 1)

Libs wrote:

Yeah, the pilot could've been better (its focus was a little off), but I still enjoyed it.

The cast is pretty amazing (and I actually have always liked Calista Flockhart, I was an Ally McBeal fan back in the day), and the included political element was fairly interesting. I wasn't a huge fan of Rachel Griffiths' storyline with the crooked family business, but I guess we should wait to see how that's going to turn out.

Mr. X wrote:

Hmm... sounds like I can skip the series?

Dkmuto wrote:

I'm behind, but I do all have all the episodes recorded.

The pilot I liked, the second episode I thought was baaaaad, but the third episode ("Affairs of State," the one with the party where Nora reveals that she knew about the affair) I liked.

I'll be catching up soon.

Libs wrote:

So I'm watching it right now, it's pretty gosh darn good. Kind of mad I haven't been upkeeping watching it.

Author:	Libs [ Sun Sep 24, 2006 9:37 am ]
Post subject:	The "Brothers & Sisters" Thread (Season 1)
ABC's ensemble family drama Brothers & Sisters, starring Calista Flockhart, Sally Field, Rachel Griffiths, Balthazar Getty, Dave Annable, Matthew Rhys, Patricia Wettig and Ron Rifkin, premieres tonight at 10 PM EST, following Desperate Housewives. There's been some bad buzz swirling around the show after multiple production changes over the summer, but let's see how the show actually is, and does in the same time slot that Grey's Anatomy became an instant hit in.

Author:	Flava'd vs The World [ Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:41 am ]
Post subject:
didn't they already do this last year with Sons and Daughters?

Author:	Raffiki [ Sun Sep 24, 2006 1:15 pm ]
Post subject:
I really can't wait to see this and see if it's really good or not. Unfortunately, I'll have to tape it and watch it tomorrow as with Housewives since I'm out tonight.

Author:	Dkmuto [ Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:15 pm ]
Post subject:
The pilot's received some positive reviews (Wall Street Journal, USA Today, New York Post), but some pretty scathing ones, as well (Time, Washington Post, Boston Globe, Variety). I'm still really looking forward to it. I'll be watching.

Author:	Harry Warden [ Sun Sep 24, 2006 11:40 pm ]
Post subject:
Awful show. The characters and performances were very annoying. So shrill.

World of KJ http://worldofkj.com/forum/

The "Brothers & Sisters" Thread (Season 1) http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=23818	Page 1 of 8

Author:	Dkmuto [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:44 am ]
Post subject:
It was a bit of a mixed bag for me, but I ultimately ended up liking it. The acting was uniformly great. Sally Field, Calista Flockhart, Rachel Griffiths, and Ron Rifkin are all extremely qualified actors, even solely based on their TV resumes. But they're almost too good for the writing that was on display tonight: The rapport between the siblings and family was cheesy and incredibly contrived, and you could tell it wasn't the actors' faults. The dialogue, especially near the beginning, felt stagey and unnatural. The stuff with the business I also found utterly boring. Embezzlement? Is that going to be the crux of the season? I hope not. What did work for me, though, was Kitty's politics and its implications with her relationship with her family. It didn't necessarily feel real to me, and it definitely wasn't as provocative as it could've been, but I find stuff like that interesting. Stuff like the mom being able to reconcile her feelings toward the husband's and son's political leanings but not toward Kitty's did kind of feel real to me, though. My only worry is that what I'm finding most interesting in the show looks to be (at least looking at the previews for next week) that which is going to be abandoned for more melodramatic plotlines ("I wish I was DEAD!"). I hope that's not the case. It wasn't perfect, but I'll still be watching, definitely. I'm even more willing to keep up with this than I am with something like Studio 60.

Author:	Libs [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:49 am ]
Post subject:
Yeah, the pilot could've been better (its focus was a little off), but I still enjoyed it. The cast is pretty amazing (and I actually have always liked Calista Flockhart, I was an Ally McBeal fan back in the day), and the included political element was fairly interesting. I wasn't a huge fan of Rachel Griffiths' storyline with the crooked family business, but I guess we should wait to see how that's going to turn out.

Author:	Christian [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:17 am ]
Post subject:
Libs wrote: Yeah, the pilot could've been better (its focus was a little off), but I still enjoyed it. The cast is pretty amazing (and I actually have always liked Calista Flockhart, I was an Ally McBeal fan back in the day), and the included political element was fairly interesting. I wasn't a huge fan of Rachel Griffiths' storyline with the crooked family business, but I guess we should wait to see how that's going to turn out. That's what I thought too. Decent but could be WAY better! And damn, can this family be any more good looking??? The whole family secret (which I could guess based on Patricia Wettig's character) reeks too much of Pasadena.

Author:	Christian [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:05 am ]
Post subject:
Few observations: I am glad that Dave Annable (the youngest sibling... Justin?) isn't playing a geek/lovelorn sidekick this time. Mini-Ally McBeal reunion between Josh Hopkins and Calista Flockhart. lol It's funny how the little girl (Paige?) can name off stars and constellations yet is oblivious to her grandfather clutching his chest and having difficulty breathing. That's tragic melodrama right there! Kevin (?) the gay brother was barely in the pilot and with and was given nothing really when he shows up. I'd like to see him butt heads with Kitty more with their politics but it seems like it's the mother who would butt heads more with Kitty. Can you smell Matt from Melrose Place? Rachel Griffiths once again, is fine. Oh... Balthazar Getty have always played shady characters. I wouldn't be too shocked if he knew about his dad's secrets or at least a part of them.

Author:	Mister Ecks [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:48 pm ]
Post subject:
Hmm... sounds like I can skip the series?

Author:	Christian [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:53 pm ]
Post subject:
Mr. X wrote: Hmm... sounds like I can skip the series? It's an acquired taste. Seems like you could as according to Marc Berman, it lost more than 2 million viewers in the 2nd half-hour. And the showrunner changes (hello, Commander in Chief, anyone?) doesn't sound too promising.

Author:	Raffiki [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:40 pm ]
Post subject:
I really enjoyed it. And I agree with almost everything everyone has been saying. I don't know how great of a drama this could develop into on network TV but I think it's really the type of thing I would watch. Of course, there are 4 actors from 2 alumni shows that now rank in my top 5 of all time (3 from Alias and 1 from Six Feet Under) but that's beside the point. I liked the ending. I'm kinda glad the dad passed away... I don't know, he just didnt seem to fit in the show to me and it makes it alot more interesting having some secrets to uncover without being able to confront him. I don't think Rachel Griffiths will ever live down Six Feet Under... at least in my eyes. She just seems like such a weird fit for any character that's not Brenda but I love to see her And ya... what a hot cast!

Author:	Raffiki [ Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:09 am ]
Post subject:
I'm really liking this show. Both Sally feild's and Rachel Griffiths' breakdowns were awesome!! And that troubled son is so freakin hot

Author:	Mister Ecks [ Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:45 am ]
Post subject:
Rachel Griffiths and Ron Rifkin are the main reasons why I want to try this series. I might try to find the first two shows, and see if it's worth the watch.

Page 1 of 8	All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Raffiki [ Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:28 pm ]
Post subject:
I don't exactly know what it is and I wouldn't call him a bad actor since I haven't seen him do much more, but I loathe Balthazar Getty as an actor. It's like he adds nothing. He has like no emotions.

Author:	Raffiki [ Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:30 am ]
Post subject:
Ok, so I REALLY liked this episode. And I do think it was the best episode so far. It wasn't over the top cliche and drama like the first couple of episodes were. EVERYONE on this show is either freakin hot or incredibly cute/adorable. And I just realized that Sal and Holly also played potential love interests on Alias (Holly played the CIA therapist that in season 3 some thought would hook up with Sloane... or at least I thought there was something).

Author:	Raffiki [ Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:15 am ]
Post subject:
Anybody else watching this? I think it's my second favorite show of the season after Ugly Betty... don't think I would have evr believed I'd have two new shows as my top 2 favorites (especially over Lost and DH). It's like Ugly Betty for me in that it's really fun to watch. I think it's unlike Ugly Betty in the sense that I think it may actually take itself somewhat seriously. However, I don't. I think it can pretty cliche and overly dramatic at times and predictable but I enjoy it because I love these types of family dramas.

Author:	Raffiki [ Mon Nov 06, 2006 3:42 am ]
Post subject:
So, I'm obviously the only one here watching this show It was GREAT tonight. Kinda reminded me of The Family Stone dinner scene. But ya, it just keeps surprising me how much they emphasize and play in the dynamics involved with the gay character.

Author:	thompsoncory [ Mon Nov 06, 2006 8:42 am ]
Post subject:
I watch it religiously. It's one of my favorites of the season. I missed last night's but I taped it and will watch it soon!

Author:	Libs [ Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:51 pm ]
Post subject:
I keep wanting to watch this and then not getting around to it. I've been kindasorta keeping up with the ABC.com "previouslies" but they don't actually show episodes for this like they do for other shows. Hopefully I can watch it this Sunday

Author:	Dkmuto [ Sat Nov 11, 2006 8:25 pm ]
Post subject:
I'm behind, but I do all have all the episodes recorded. The pilot I liked, the second episode I thought was baaaaad, but the third episode ("Affairs of State," the one with the party where Nora reveals that she knew about the affair) I liked. I'll be catching up soon.

Author:	Raffiki [ Sun Nov 12, 2006 1:04 am ]
Post subject:
Dkmuto wrote: I'm behind, but I do all have all the episodes recorded. The pilot I liked, the second episode I thought was baaaaad, but the third episode ("Affairs of State," the one with the party where Nora reveals that she knew about the affair) I liked. I'll be catching up soon. I actually started to REALLY like it. I hinestly think the gay storyline adds alot to it because it's somethin we have rarely ever seen on network television.

Author:	Libs [ Sun Nov 12, 2006 11:43 pm ]
Post subject:
So I'm watching it right now, it's pretty gosh darn good. Kind of mad I haven't been upkeeping watching it.

Author:	Raffiki [ Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:39 am ]
Post subject:
Libs wrote: So I'm watching it right now, it's pretty gosh darn good. Kind of mad I haven't been upkeeping watching it. It's gotten insanely addicting for me. They've had some really great episodes in the last few weeks. I think it's stupid how out of all of ABC's shows, B&S seems to be one of those that would MOST benefit from re-airing free online or at LEAST being up on iTunes to download and it's neither. Somtimes, I seriously don't understand the thinking process that goes into that kind of stuff. Grey's Anatomy repeats like crazy and you don't miss much if you miss one episode. Lost... if you miss an episode, there are so many ways to get it, it's not even anythng to worry about: people record, discuss it with detail constantly, and have it up to download on the internet like the next day. Not to mention those shows as well as The Nine and DH are ALL on i-Tunes. Why not have B&S on ABC.com?