Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:07 am



Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 2016 Election: Back To The Future? 
Author Message
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8636
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
Shack is right....


Going back to a Gore/Kerry choice would be lethal for the Democrats..
A Romney style character is also not good for the Republicans either...


Hilary vs Christie would pretty much end up being decided by moderates...
Christie has improved himself and now is quite well liked in NJ, and Sandy has shown that he is a good man who cares for his people greatly.
Hilary is likley one of the most well liked and respected Democrats in the country. She actually enjoys a lot of respect from Moderates and Normal Republicans as well.

I think the only problem with Christie is that he is not a normal politician... He speaks his mind and well sometimes he says stuff that gets him in trouble...
However, over time... What I have seen is that if people like the man they actually ignore the gaffes...

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:53 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
Mannyisthebest wrote:
Shack is right....


LOL

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:41 am
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
Mannyisthebest wrote:
I know Warren has humble origins but her tone and attitude just reminds me of John Kerry...


And Hilary's tone and attitude is like a shrill, entitled, bitter old nag. What's your point? I actually like Warren's tone, it's rather reassuring and kindly without being submissive. I could listen to her for four or eight years and not want to castrate myself.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:08 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8636
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
"What's your point? "

Um choosing Warren would leave the door open to the Republicans to come back to the white house...

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:15 pm
Profile WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
How, because she's hawkish on banks? Banks are pretty unpopular. It's a selling point, if anything. Though it might piss off the Geithner types the Democrats have wooed since the mid-1970s. Plus, she's also hawkish on Iran. Honestly, my dream candidate is Feingold, but that's seriously unlikely.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Sat Nov 17, 2012 1:19 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8636
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
Come on Tyler...


Running for President is more about image and likeability...
I dont see Warren scoring high on either.

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:43 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
L.
O.
L.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... ?hpt=hp_t3

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:48 am
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8636
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
Lol I would take Hilary over Grandpa Joe Biden or a liar like Obama.

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Thu Sep 26, 2013 11:38 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
YOU'RE CANADIAN. NOBODY GIVES A SHIT.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:10 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8636
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
I think most American would agree ^

Do you want Grandpa Joe Biden as President or another inexperienced man like Obama in office?

I think the next President needs to be one who can say "Yes I have and yes we can, yes we shall"
Then "yes we can"

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Fri Sep 27, 2013 9:17 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
No. I don't want that. Because the person you're describing is some dick who is already in deep politics.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Fri Sep 27, 2013 11:55 am
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
There's almost no difference between Hillary or Obama politically and neither of them give a shit about us. They're careerists. The only Republican that could win is Fat Man, who is politically close to them or Cory Booker except socially a tad more conservative.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Sat Sep 28, 2013 1:17 pm
Profile
A very honest-hearted fellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 4767
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
Tyler wrote:
There's almost no difference between Hillary or Obama politically and neither of them give a shit about us.

Agree. Most of the differences in candidates within parties stem from temperament and speaking ability. Any differences between those two are on the margins and maybe how they go about a policy goal rather than the policy itself.

Same with a McCain and Romney. Although McCain's need to bomb people really seems to be marginalizing him further from based on the shift in the GOP over the last year or so on privacy/military action.

I dislike Christie because he is fat and that suggests to me he lacks discipline. Whatever, genes, I don't care.


Sat Sep 28, 2013 9:11 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8636
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
Thats a silly argument.

Obama smokes does that show lack of will power?

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Sun Sep 29, 2013 7:29 am
Profile WWW
A very honest-hearted fellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 4767
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
Mannyisthebest wrote:
Thats a silly argument.

Obama smokes does that show lack of will power?

It shows he succumbed to peer pressure and picked up an expensive and stupid habit and yes it shows he lacks self-discipline, though indications are that he has mostly quit.


Sun Sep 29, 2013 10:57 am
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8636
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
Imo looking into the past Superfical leaders get nothing done.

The ones who are more real and relatable have,

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:15 am
Profile WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
Presidents don't exist to be "leaders". They exist to distract from real power.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Tue Oct 01, 2013 5:24 am
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
The Democrat candidates look to be Warren, Clinton and Biden. In my opinion, obviously.

I'd say that is a MUCH stronger slate than anything the Republicans throw out.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:03 pm
Profile
A very honest-hearted fellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 4767
Post Re: 2016 Election: Back To The Future?
Tyler wrote:
How, because she's hawkish on banks? Banks are pretty unpopular. It's a selling point, if anything. Though it might piss off the Geithner types the Democrats have wooed since the mid-1970s. Plus, she's also hawkish on Iran. Honestly, my dream candidate is Feingold, but that's seriously unlikely.

What about this bank? http://go.bloomberg.com/political-capital/2014-07-18/warren-backs-ex-im-bank-heritage-invites/


Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:50 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.