The more people get to see of Obama and the other candidates, the more they get to realize hows AWFUL a leader they have right now is, and how much better America can do
| World of KJ http://worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=38796 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | Beeblebrox [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 3:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
http://americanresearchgroup.com/economy/ And everyone thought it had bottomed out! Well, at least Bush now has a legitimate claim to a legacy that no other president can make. Isn't that what he always wanted? EDIT: I couldn't fit all of my headline. It's the lowest approval rating of any president since recorded polling, lower even than Nixon's during Watergate. |
|
| Author: | insomniacdude [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
I just saw the news as well. It's mind-boggling. 19%?! Really? Any one of us could manage at least a 1-out-of-5 approval rating. Bush can't even get that? |
|
| Author: | Box [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
The more people get to see of Obama and the other candidates, the more they get to realize hows AWFUL a leader they have right now is, and how much better America can do
|
|
| Author: | Chris [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
That's insane. 
|
|
| Author: | Groucho [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
I can't believe it! 19% of the people still approve of him??? What has he got to do to lose them, kill somebody? |
|
| Author: | redfirebird2008 [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Groucho wrote: I can't believe it! 19% of the people still approve of him??? What has he got to do to lose them, kill somebody? It's the right wing neo-cons that still support him. |
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
I support him. |
|
| Author: | Groucho [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Munk·E wrote: I support him. Do you have a reason? Or is this just blind loyalty to your party? |
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Well... if you paid attention, you would know that I'm probably voting for Obama... So... Cross off #2. I think he has done a lot of great things for our economy. Probably shouldn't be allowed to talk to other countries anymore... but... yeah. |
|
| Author: | Libs [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Good. It makes me happy that he will be remembered as one of the worst presidents of all time. |
|
| Author: | Caius [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Libs wrote: Good. It makes me happy that he will be remembered as one of the worst presidents of all time. Isn't that prediction pretty early? Harry Truman was disliked and history has been pretty kind to him. I still support Bush out of blind party loyalty. |
|
| Author: | Groucho [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
I'm reminded of a quote Al Franken once said about the difference between Democrats and Republicans... Democrats love America like an adult loves their spouse. You have your disagreements, things you wish were better, but you value the relationship and want both of you to improve as people. Republicans love America like a toddler loves their mother. Mommy is perfect and everything she does is wonderful, and if you say otherwise you’re lying and a very bad man. And the same goes for the love they have for their party! |
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Al Franken is obviously an idiot. |
|
| Author: | Beeblebrox [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Groucho wrote: Republicans love America like a toddler loves their mother. Mommy is perfect and everything she does is wonderful, and if you say otherwise you’re lying and a very bad man. I think that's only true when there's a Republican president. They weren't so fond of American policies during the Clinton administration. So I'd argue that their party loyalty trumps love of America. |
|
| Author: | Harry Warden [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
But this is the first time Obama's stupid as hell wife is proud of her country. That's the dumbest, arrogant, and ignorant statement in a long while. Obama only cares about Obama and how much power he can get. |
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Democrats were gaga over Clinton, but hate Bush. Smells like major party loyalty to me! |
|
| Author: | Beeblebrox [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Munk·E wrote: Democrats were gaga over Clinton, but hate Bush. Smells like major party loyalty to me! Clinton was a pretty good president and Bush is an incompetent retard. That's a judgment based on merit if ever there was one. |
|
| Author: | Harry Warden [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Beeblebrox wrote: Munk·E wrote: Democrats were gaga over Clinton, but hate Bush. Smells like major party loyalty to me! Clinton was a pretty good president and Bush is an incompetent retard. That's a judgment based on merit if ever there was one. Clinton didn't enough to prevent 9/11. He knew about things way before it happened. |
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Beeblebrox wrote: Munk·E wrote: Democrats were gaga over Clinton, but hate Bush. Smells like major party loyalty to me! Clinton was a pretty good president and Bush is an incompetent retard. That's a judgment based on merit if ever there was one. Last I checked, retards don't become president. Unless, of course, they run against even BIGGER retards. Which... if you are to be correct, then the Democratic parties are the retards in this situation for nominating even bigger retards. So... pick your poison. |
|
| Author: | Beeblebrox [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Joe wrote: Clinton didn't enough to prevent 9/11. He knew about things way before it happened. That's nonsense. |
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Beeblebrox wrote: Joe wrote: Clinton didn't enough to prevent 9/11. He knew about things way before it happened. That's nonsense. About as nonsensical as the economic recession is Bush's fault. |
|
| Author: | Harry Warden [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Beeblebrox wrote: Joe wrote: Clinton didn't enough to prevent 9/11. He knew about things way before it happened. That's nonsense. 
|
|
| Author: | Beeblebrox [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Munk·E wrote: Last I checked, retards don't become president. Then check harder because we have a retarded president. Quote: Unless, of course, they run against even BIGGER retards. Which... if you are to be correct, then the Democratic parties are the retards in this situation for nominating even bigger retards. So... pick your poison. This is what we in the real world call a false dichotomy. Bush can be a retard (which he is) and win an election even if he is running against someone who isn't retarded (which he did). What has to happen is that the people voting for him don't care that he is a retard or don't know that he is a retard; and his opponent has to run a terrible campaign (which is true for both Kerry and Gore). |
|
| Author: | Beeblebrox [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Munk·E wrote: About as nonsensical as the economic recession is Bush's fault. SInce you credit him with the economy when it's doing well, doesn't it make sense to blame him when things go wrong? Oh, that's right. Making sense isn't really your thing, is it. |
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bush's approval at 19% - lowest in recorded history |
Well... if a retard can run a better campaign than Gore AND Kerry... they must both be even MORE retarded. Seems you have a conundrum! |
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|