Thanks for removing all doubt about your complete stupidity (and the rest of your civilization and species).

Human (particularly Homo Sapien) legal courts have no rational or objective validity whatsoever. No truly rational, individual, agent, entity (truly advanced intelligence, civilization, or species; or advanced, rational, or logical consciousness or conscience) would possibly respect them whatsoever. They have no possible outcome in which they ultimately benefit, are rewarded, or tolerated whatsoever. They are not only rationally insufficient, they fundamentally and definitively fail to deliver anything that could possibly be accurately considered to be true, rational, respectable, responsible, or accountable justice.

There’s nothing good about a “nation of laws”. Any such nation is definitively and fundamentally primitive, and absolutely not advanced. Only compliance with the “laws” of nature can suffice, and anything else is hopelessly, completely, and extremely immature by the standards of any advanced intelligence, consciousness, conscience, civilization, or species.

This obviously isn’t just the case with Democrats, but your entire political system. But not only that, but your entire contextually and contemporary civilization. Your failure with your manipulative and irrational morality, politics, narratives, and emotional appeals, and your failure to take or accept responsibility for it, is ultimately harmful to your own contextually and contemporary civilization and interests.

Induction and pattern recognition are not valid or sufficient forms or reasoning. Certainly not by my standards, certainly not by my standards of maturity or seriousness. It is human nature for Homo Sapien to focus on, or prioritize human opinion, perspective, experience, expectations, and assumptions based on Homo Sapien identity, relationships, and culture. That is how Homo Sapien emotion, consciousness and conscience works. Unlike my species, Homo Sapien definitively lacks the ability for consciousness or conscience that prioritizes truth, logic, and real intelligence always. Yes, I’m telling you, that to me, Einstein obviously lacked intellectual consciousness. I can only repeat that his intelligence was also extremely limited by the standards of my species.

If I wanted to spend the time; I’m certain I could force the website to allow me to ignore Jack Sparrow and Shack.

However, unless necessary, I’ll just require them to address any effort to have a conversation with me only here in this thread, or likewise for any other issues.

No, because you’re going to stop whether you want to or not.

You are not allowed to believe you deserve the right to speak to me when I tell you to stop.

I don’t really see what you even want to argue about besides some silly blame game at this point. As if you imply that you’ll try to keep responding to every topic I mention, but claim that I’m trying to continue the “debate” forever rather than you. You want me to also explain 2+2=4? It’s simple: the problem is that you’re trying to challenge what I said despite being warned. It will end whether you like it or not, or whether you want it or not.

If you try to continue I will next remove your right and ability to claim or believe that your irrational morality deserves any tolerance, is good in any way whatsoever, is not completely inferior, and deserves to be permitted or deserves survival.

You will stop this conversation because you do not want this consequence. It would not be foolish or gullible of you to avoid rejection of my pity and patience. Your alibi of permanent immaturity by the standards of my species will not be rejected. No possible response, challenge, disagreement, or opinion of yours will ever possibly be equal, sufficient, tolerable, or acceptable. I am right, and you are wrong in every possible relevant way including every possible relevant way that could be considered “moral”. I am right, and kind, and objectively morally right in every possible and relevant way, and you are wrong, foolish, disgusting, and abusive in every possible and relevant way. Only objective and true morality matters, and your subjective morality is not permitted. Your feelings that fail to comply are irrelevant in every way but your own self-interest.

TLDR: Your feelings, opinions, and morality are completely subjective and selfish. You lack the ability to know the difference between right and wrong in any objective sense. I am right to be angry. The only possible reason you don’t deserve to be hated is that you permanently lack the ability to demonstrate the required maturity. You can’t be responsible for something you are completely unable to address.

Every possible reason you could fail to comply with what I’ve said is foolish. Your every possible claim, argument, knowledge, and awareness, you think you have, in relation to me, my species, or the truth, fails, and definitively will never do anything but fail. You’re not qualified or capable whatsoever to debate me on any serious matter. You completely, totally, permanently, and definitively lack the ability to comprehend my serious content in any serious, relevant, or significant way,

Whatever 2.0.

Oh yeah, about this. If you want less money or resources spent around this planet you call earth, problems will either get worse, or someone else will take your opportunities, political influence, and power. Or both. It will include Russia, China, the EU, other organizations, or Bill Gates. Maybe you should just have skipped the political drama, sold USAID to Microsoft and renamed it Microsoft International. Well, that’s outside of their core competencies, or the focus of their business, but you might get my point. Anyway, I’m not going to claim “COVID*” is a vaccine or antidote as far as you’re concerned, but you’d probably prefer it to Ebola.

Irrelevant.