| World of KJ http://worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| hey torrino http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=53855 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Michael A [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | hey torrino |
wtf? what happened to your policy of never locking threads in "the site"? I liked that, and now you locked two of them that had plenty of reason to continue discussion. Although I am glad that joe was banned, I'm surprised everyone responded so rudely to jim's post. IMO that kind of personal attack is completely un-called for and deserves a ban. |
|
| Author: | Korrgan [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
Our dear (lol) admin has made plenty of personal attacks about people's issues they chose to share on KJ. I think it's a bit hypocritical for him to start taking issue now and banning people over them, when he's done it himself. |
|
| Author: | paper [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
I take responsibility for the locked threads |
|
| Author: | Grill [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 5:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
paper wrote: I take responsibility for the locked threads nope, didn't he open it and post and then lock it. He could have left it open.... and are all these issues being voting on...like was promised. Just wondering. |
|
| Author: | torrino [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 5:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
I didn't lock the threads. |
|
| Author: | torrino [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 5:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
Grill wrote: and are all these issues being voting on...like was promised. Just wondering. Yes. Enough mods wanted Joe banned. We have yet to decide on the length of his ban. |
|
| Author: | Korrgan [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 5:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
paper wrote: I take responsibility for the locked threads And no thread in The Site discussing something the admin team did was ever suppose to be locked. Way to go, paper. And also, where are the threads showing the steps the admin team took in deciding something? That was part of Torri Spelling's campaign, that everything would be known. And I don't think they've listed one single thing. |
|
| Author: | STEVE ROGERS [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 5:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
torrino wrote: Grill wrote: and are all these issues being voting on...like was promised. Just wondering. Yes. Enough mods wanted Joe banned. We have yet to decide on the length of his ban. The whole concept of banning someone on a public website is absurd.. Joe's been gone long enough.. Why on earth should he be banned again and for what??? Cause not enough posters have thicker skins and can't take the heat like Savage??? |
|
| Author: | torrino [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 5:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
Joe actually asked us to ban him a week or so ago. |
|
| Author: | paper [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
Korrgan wrote: paper wrote: I take responsibility for the locked threads And no thread in The Site discussing something the admin team did was ever suppose to be locked. Way to go, paper. Actually, they weren't threads discussing what the admin team did. Halpert's was a complaint about Joe, and Snack's was an unnecessary thread asking what happened, when clearly all the evidence needed was in the Halpert thread. |
|
| Author: | Argos [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
paper will not be a member of the new Argos administration. |
|
| Author: | paper [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
Aw damnit. |
|
| Author: | Argos [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
Joe might take your position. |
|
| Author: | paper [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
An inspired choice |
|
| Author: | Korrgan [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
paper wrote: Korrgan wrote: paper wrote: I take responsibility for the locked threads And no thread in The Site discussing something the admin team did was ever suppose to be locked. Way to go, paper. Actually, they weren't threads discussing what the admin team did. Halpert's was a complaint about Joe, and Snack's was an unnecessary thread asking what happened, when clearly all the evidence needed was in the Halpert thread. It was a discussion of what happened. That's what it became. |
|
| Author: | Argos [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
paper wrote: An inspired choice I always felt he had all that it takes to become a cleaner. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
Feel free to discuss as much as you like in those threads. |
|
| Author: | paper [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
FYI everyone Lecter wants to be Admin |
|
| Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
Do I? |
|
| Author: | Argos [ Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hey torrino |
No. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|