| World of KJ http://worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| few bannings http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=46262 |
Page 1 of 16 |
| Author: | El Maskado [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | few bannings |
The mods and admins have reviewed and conferred the events that transpired in The Water Cooler on Sunday and have come to the following conclusions: > A shitty thing was done on Sunday to an innocent and valued member of the community. It was instigated by a mod and a poster who shall go unnamed at this time so as to warrant a new bullet point. > The shitty thing was instigated by Christian and Korrgan. Evidently, the former provided the latter with (erroneous) information about another poster who, at this time (see above bullet point for reason), shall go unnamed, indicating that said poster might be a double account. The latter then saw fit to take forum law into their own hands and threw said poster to the lions, the lions in this case being the surprisingly - and depressingly - mob happy KJ denizens. > In case you hadn't guessed, the aforementioned unnamed poster was Libs. Who, let it be said at this time, is not filmlover's double account. What transpired in the thread was disappointing and, at times, bloody pathetic. It quickly devolved into a witchhunt, with numerous posters leaping into the fray and saying some pretty abhorrent things. Some of these posters we expected more of, others pretty much played to par. What should have always been a matter dealt with in private by forum staffers, turned into a public display of character assassination and personal attacks. For shame. Now, this issue is unlikely to be resolved here and now, but measures can - and are being - taken to try to ensure it doesn't happen again. > First off, Christian is no longer a mod. He tendered his resignation in the aftermath of the event and we respect his decision. Mainly because had he not, we would've had to tender it for him. Breaches of privacy on this level will not be tolerated at KJ. No matter how nice and cuddly they may be. > Certain members, in light of their behaviour in numerous threads that night, will be having their posting privileges taken away for a week. These posters are as follows: Chip (one week ban) getluv (one week ban) Korrgan (TWO week ban) Maverikk (one week ban) french man (one week ban) These posters, in the numerous threads relating to this childish and pathetic drama, personally attacked each other and other members on many occasions. Hopefully this will serve as a lesson to them that we will no longer accept the kind of behaviour displayed in those threads. Guys, if you don't have anything nice to say, tell it to the mods or shut the fuck up. > For the many good, kind posters who come here to talk about films and life in general, we apologise for what occurred on Sunday, and ask that if there's one thing they take away from this whole ordeal it's that some people are just twats, and it's best to rise above it and try to consort with the many lovely posters here who are not. We've lost a great many good posters here in recent months, and we don't plan on losing any more. We may even have a few tricks up our sleeves to get the old ones back. Such as a cash prize for a certain Squee. In conclusion, if you're thinking of making a similar thread about any other posters (unless it's for overtly comic reasons), don't. Any further comments/complaints will be duly looked at and acted on or thrown away as necessary. Thank you Mod Team |
|
| Author: | snack [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
Quote: > First off, Christian is no longer a mod. He tendered his resignation in the aftermath of the event and we respect his decision. Mainly because had he not, we would've had to tender it for him. I think that's really unfair to say. |
|
| Author: | El Maskado [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
snack wrote: Quote: > First off, Christian is no longer a mod. He tendered his resignation in the aftermath of the event and we respect his decision. Mainly because had he not, we would've had to tender it for him. I think that's really unfair to say. If someone is in the mod position of leaking out info to another party, it goes against the confidential agreement. |
|
| Author: | Snrub [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
snack wrote: Quote: > First off, Christian is no longer a mod. He tendered his resignation in the aftermath of the event and we respect his decision. Mainly because had he not, we would've had to tender it for him. I think that's really unfair to say. Christian was a great mod and is a great guy who had a massive lapse of judgement. It's sad that he resigned, but there was absolutely no way that he could've been kept on as a mod given the circumstances. It's a testament to his character that he decided to step down. Hopefully he'll continue posting regardless, cos he's a top bloke and one of my personal faves on the site regardless of this mishap. |
|
| Author: | Corpse [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
Is it possible a little more specific reasons were given not named Korrgan? I decided some time ago I didn't want to be involved in any drama and such, and haven't been for some time, and Ive generally moved out of caring all that much about what happens here or anywhere online, but... I don't really like getting hit with PMs and IMs over this asking me to be the middle man to figure out why they were banned, etc. I think they just want to know some specifics, don't really think anyone is complaining over being banned really, but mostly asking why. |
|
| Author: | DepartedLvr [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
That's bologna |
|
| Author: | Disappointed [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
This is sad KJ. This is really sad. You just lost another poster for good. |
|
| Author: | snack [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
Oh I wasn't saying that it would have been unfair for you to remove his mod-ness, I was referring to the fact that Roid implied that Christian only resigned because he new he was going to be forced to anyways...but re-reading Roid's post, the reference could have been ambiguous and he might have just been saying that they respect his decision because they would have done to him the same. Anyways, nevermind. |
|
| Author: | Gulli [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
This cash prize for the return of Squee, is it dead or alive? |
|
| Author: | Eagle [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
The Dark Knight wrote: Disappointed wrote: This is sad KJ. This is really sad. You just lost another poster for good. Korrgan? French Man. |
|
| Author: | Eagle [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
snack wrote: Oh I wasn't saying that it would have been unfair for you to remove his mod-ness, I was referring to the fact that Roid implied that Christian only resigned because he new he was going to be forced to anyways...but re-reading Roid's post, the reference could have been ambiguous and he might have just been saying that they respect his decision because they would have done to him the same. Anyways, nevermind. I don't think the reference was in any way implying that, rather it meant that even if he hadn't resigned, WoKJ simply can't tolerate personal information being given out by it's mods, regardless of how great the mod may have been, and make no mistake, Christian was a great mod. |
|
| Author: | Snrub [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
Disappointed wrote: This is sad KJ. This is really sad. You just lost another poster for good. Let's not get all melodramatic here, Frenchie. You stuck up for Libs, but said a few shitty things to other posters in the process. Take the medicine and come back a week from now as the french man we all know and love. |
|
| Author: | Snrub [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
Gulli wrote: This cash prize for the return of Squee, is it dead or alive? It's up for debate. I think alive would be preferable, followed closely by dead and controlled by Andrew McCarthy and Jonathan Silverman. |
|
| Author: | Rev [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
Royd wrote: > Certain members, in light of their behaviour in numerous threads that night, will be having their posting privileges taken away for a week. These posters are as follows: Chip (one week ban) getluv (one week ban) Korrgan (TWO week ban) Maverikk (one week ban) french man (one week ban) Bravo!  Obama approves.
|
|
| Author: | Price [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
If I leave and come back do I get some ca$h too? |
|
| Author: | DepartedLvr [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
Rev wrote: Royd wrote: > Certain members, in light of their behaviour in numerous threads that night, will be having their posting privileges taken away for a week. These posters are as follows: Chip (one week ban) getluv (one week ban) Korrgan (TWO week ban) Maverikk (one week ban) french man (one week ban) Bravo! Obama approves.
|
|
| Author: | Snrub [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
Price wrote: If I leave and come back do I get some ca$h too? Are you Squee? |
|
| Author: | Mister Ecks [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
|
|
| Author: | Price [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
Snrub wrote: Price wrote: If I leave and come back do I get some ca$h too? Are you Squee? I'm squeer than Squee. |
|
| Author: | Argos [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
Royd wrote: getluv (one week ban) Well done. |
|
| Author: | timothy [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
thank you!!! most of these people deserve it after their words in that thread!!! my goodness Tim |
|
| Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
Eagle wrote: The Dark Knight wrote: Disappointed wrote: This is sad KJ. This is really sad. You just lost another poster for good. Korrgan? French Man. 
|
|
| Author: | makeshift [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
I'm wondering if there is some other place the majority of KJ's denizens go to talk about movies, because this ridiculous, petty bullshit has completely overrun what (I always thought) this place was largely supposed to be about. Granted, the Water Cooler can be a decently fun and entertaining place sometimes, but it seems like it has become the main thrust of the entire community. Hopefully the events of the past couple days reverse this trend. I'd like to see some effort made to get this back to a place where people come to talk about movies, music, videogames, or whatever art is currently blowing their skirt up, and not a place where people come to act like eighth graders. I'm not under any delusion that I haven't said/done stupid shit here, but I'm hoping as a community we can figure this out and get the ship righted again. |
|
| Author: | Shack [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
I'll play devil's advocate and say this is going too far. Korrgan's ban you can make a case for (though she was seemingly just stating what she heard), the rest didn't act any better or worse than they normally do in "dramahz" situations like this. Frankly if you wanted more people to be punished, I should've been first on the list... I'm equally as guilty as Korrgan and Christian for blowing up this mess. I'll gladly accept a ban to be honest, I deserve it and it'd probably do me well to take a week off. |
|
| Author: | Grill [ Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: few bannings |
Shack wrote: I'll play devil's advocate and say this is going too far. Korrgan's ban you can make a case for (though she was seemingly just stating what she heard), the rest didn't act any better or worse than they normally do in "dramahz" situations like this. Frankly if you wanted more people to be punished, I should've been first on the list... I'm equally as guilty as Korrgan and Christian for blowing up this mess. I'll gladly accept a ban to be honest, I deserve it and it'd probably do me well to take a week off. well you are equal to Christian as he didn't even get any ban so take your a verbal tongue lashing as punishment. |
|
| Page 1 of 16 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|