World of KJ http://worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
getluv's response http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43503 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Corpse [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 4:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | getluv's response |
Quote: To whom it may concern, If the KJ moderators think I should be banned then fair enough. It’s their forum they have a duty of care to the other users as well. I would like to say hello to someone first, Misinformation. Hello Misinformation. Howz it been we have issues to sort out. Some of you are under impression that I start fights, quite the contrary actually. Back in 2005, I would randomly start fights but I was never banned during that time. I had very few acquaintances and was severely disliked by the majority of the community. Over the years I have improved to the point where I actually care about certain users. I search my username every week or so to see what other people have been saying about me in the rest of the forum. Some of these comments at times have been “unsavoryâ€Â. I don’t see the point in starting attacks on someone unless they have given me a reason to start one. For example, I was given a warning for suggesting to Corey to call himself a “cunt face†because he is a cunt face. What Roid didn’t see were the minutes before it where he made a comment in regards to me being placed 4th in Michael’s power list. Was it an overreaction? Yes. But to think I should just report the post as “baiting†would be kind of pointless. If Roid says he’s in charge of looking after the box office side of things, then I hope he does this in future. I shouldn’t have to go looking for every -ve comment said about me. Moderating over the past few months has been inconsistent. When Roid says that every moderation decision is fair and free from bias I should hope so. But when I was told Munke would not receive a warning because some of his comments over the past weekend were in response to my comments then this pissed me off. Well using that analogy the post I was banned for I was merely responding to something Michael had said. I usually agree with everything Michael says, up until that day. I explained my decision behind why I would not play nice with MunkE. I had left MunkE alone for a great deal of time over the past year, none of his comments bothered me and he left me alone. Until one day a few months ago when he just came out of nowhere and just attacked me. The same problem with inconsistency can be seen with Argos and Guybrush. They were eventually banned but how long did it take. How many “report posts†did I have to do to achieve that. Exactly. One person reports a post were I speak about people in general and I am banned for it. One! Not multiple times, one. How come I’m warned within a heartbeat of calling mav a “sperm donor†and you guys don’t think it’s important to treat something I have to complain about promptly. This is unreasonable. Over the past few months Box has been instigating a fight with Michael that seemed to have come from nowhere. I remember at one stage I reported a post, but was never given any feedback about my complaint. This is double standards right here. I really didn’t give a damn about Box and Michael’s argument, it was just one time when Box literally just gave a very poor dig at Michael that I thought was largely unnecessary. From what I can gather, anytime getluv has a problem with something you guys just seem to let it slide. For instance the post I reported last week in regards to Argos. Was nothing done? An attack made at me in german, for which he was told to stop doing. This is the kind of crap someone shouldn’t have to stand for. I’m sorry. I followed the rules and nothing was done. This is one of the reasons why I shouldn’t bother using the “report button’ if the moderators aren’t going to step in and do what’s right for me. Is this selfish? Not really. Considering I’m allowed to dispute moderator rulings and decisions like everybody else. If they think me criticizing them should stop them from making fairer decisions in regards to me then I’m stuck aren’t i. Because this is not exactly fair and balanced moderating. Let’s move onto “threatening behaviourâ€Â. That Russian dude was given a warning in regards to threatening messages he sent to me, but how come MunkE was let off the hook when he did something quite similar. “He was responding to the comments you made blah blah blah blahâ€Â. Threatening behaviour should not be condoned at any level Roid and should be treated a lot more harshly as opposed to “baitingâ€Â. Again, MunkE is given another “free passâ€Â. So what about loyal’s comments about getting away with “murder†basically. Well Loyal over the past few months you have contributed to the deterioration of KJ in general. The box office bash fuelled by your annoying love for Wall-E and TDK has brought the site to a standstill. I’m surprised there isn’t a thread about “The Dark Knight being the highest grossing film starting with the letter ‘D’.†I voiced my attitude about these problems with this and I was given a “it will be over soon†response, the same sort of response we get about the poll function and Quick Reply. “Just Waitâ€Â. This is quite poor, because before KJ could separate itself to the other immature box office sites that compete with us, largely BOM. At the end of the day, we are no better than them, if not worse. Loyal, The Site forum is a place on KJ where people can voice their problems about their site, including moderating. I never attacked Roid, I attacked his methods and thought process in coming to a decision. All I ask when I return that there is a level in consistency in regards to the moderating on KJ in future, and I will do my best to leave people alone. Many of the people who have defended me over the past few days, I thank you. In honour of your praise I will over indulge in anal sex and will be writing more LA-Deli material. Anyway, whether or not I will be back is anyones guess. KJ is sometimes like a car accident, you wanna look away but u can’t. I’m enjoying posting on LA-Deli forums. I get quick replied everytime. -luv (u want some, ask for some) PS I do have OCD in regards to the capital g in my name. If you were me, you would understand why. PSS I luved the avatar I ended with. getluv would also like for this thread (as a thread and not a post because the other threads are a bit of a mess, and this one doesnt have to be I dont think) to remain open (unless it gets out of hand, which it really shouldn't if everyone just remains calm). And I only agreed to post the letter because it is indeed a calm letter asking for some feedback on the situtation. |
Author: | Corpse [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
Also, I am aware that part of being banned means not being able to participate in forum activity, so I won't be posting anymore messages after this one. |
Author: | neo_wolf [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
Maybe he can really go to austrailia this time. |
Author: | Corpse [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
I think you are talking about Excel? ![]() I think getluv, well, he does, live in a land called Oz. |
Author: | Rev [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
Corpse wrote: Also, I am aware that part of being banned means not being able to participate in forum activity, so I won't be posting anymore messages after this one. sure you won't ![]() |
Author: | Corpse [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
Rev wrote: Corpse wrote: Also, I am aware that part of being banned means not being able to participate in forum activity, so I won't be posting anymore messages after this one. sure you won't ![]() Messages from banned users that is. ![]() |
Author: | El Maskado [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 6:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
Corpse wrote: Quote: To whom it may concern, If the KJ moderators think I should be banned then fair enough. It’s their forum they have a duty of care to the other users as well. I would like to say hello to someone first, Misinformation. Hello Misinformation. Howz it been we have issues to sort out. Some of you are under impression that I start fights, quite the contrary actually. Back in 2005, I would randomly start fights but I was never banned during that time. I had very few acquaintances and was severely disliked by the majority of the community. Over the years I have improved to the point where I actually care about certain users. I search my username every week or so to see what other people have been saying about me in the rest of the forum. Some of these comments at times have been “unsavoryâ€Â. I don’t see the point in starting attacks on someone unless they have given me a reason to start one. For example, I was given a warning for suggesting to Corey to call himself a “cunt face†because he is a cunt face. What Roid didn’t see were the minutes before it where he made a comment in regards to me being placed 4th in Michael’s power list. Was it an overreaction? Yes. But to think I should just report the post as “baiting†would be kind of pointless. If Roid says he’s in charge of looking after the box office side of things, then I hope he does this in future. I shouldn’t have to go looking for every -ve comment said about me. Moderating over the past few months has been inconsistent. When Roid says that every moderation decision is fair and free from bias I should hope so. But when I was told Munke would not receive a warning because some of his comments over the past weekend were in response to my comments then this pissed me off. Well using that analogy the post I was banned for I was merely responding to something Michael had said. I usually agree with everything Michael says, up until that day. I explained my decision behind why I would not play nice with MunkE. I had left MunkE alone for a great deal of time over the past year, none of his comments bothered me and he left me alone. Until one day a few months ago when he just came out of nowhere and just attacked me. The same problem with inconsistency can be seen with Argos and Guybrush. They were eventually banned but how long did it take.How many “report posts†did I have to do to achieve that. Exactly. The first report you filed against him consisted of the foreign language thingy which I wasnt even able to decipher on Babavista. We have to prove that he said something nasty in your direction. Your second report was that avatar thing he used of you which I made him take down and issued a warning right after he posted back up. To my knowledge only two reports were filed against Argos prior to the whole nazi picture post. Quote: Quote: One person reports a post were I speak about people in general and I am banned for it. One! Not multiple times, one. How come I’m warned within a heartbeat of calling mav a “sperm donor†and you guys don’t think it’s important to treat something I have to complain about promptly. This is unreasonable. Your attacks were a little more blunt and laced more with profanity not in a joking way either. Not that you use this word but calling someone a dumbfuck would be weighted more than calling someone a buffoon. We do listen to your concerns, getluv. A good portion of it we have addressed but I dont know if you were satisfied with some of the outcome or not such as moving Munk-E's from the Wall E:WWW to another forum. I didnt think a warning should have been issued for that because it was only addressed as spam and I didnt see anything that was worthy of a warning when no attacks were involved. Quote: Over the past few months Box has been instigating a fight with Michael that seemed to have come from nowhere. I remember at one stage I reported a post, but was never given any feedback about my complaint. This is double standards right here. I really didn’t give a damn about Box and Michael’s argument, it was just one time when Box literally just gave a very poor dig at Michael that I thought was largely unnecessary. Well Ill take a look at the Box vs Michael in the future but FYI I didnt see any report about the post unless it was buried in the back pages of the Cooler forums. Quote: From what I can gather, anytime getluv has a problem with something you guys just seem to let it slide. For instance the post I reported last week in regards to Argos. Was nothing done? An attack made at me in german, for which he was told to stop doing. This is the kind of crap someone shouldn’t have to stand for. I’m sorry. I followed the rules and nothing was done. Its not the first time the modding team has been accused of that prior to me. Anytime a mod takes action on an individual, foul and favoritism is called from the individual as with the whole Skype issue. As for your report about ARgos, from what I heard the thing wasnt able to be deciphered in babavista. Anyhow in that regards, we will place disciplinary action on Argos if the quote holds water and was an attack on you. We will though take the foreign language thing into account if you think theres a legitimate reason why you think it should be reported like it translates to an attack on you or that nature Quote: This is one of the reasons why I shouldn’t bother using the “report button’ if the moderators aren’t going to step in and do what’s right for me. Is this selfish? Not really. Considering I’m allowed to dispute moderator rulings and decisions like everybody else. If they think me criticizing them should stop them from making fairer decisions in regards to me then I’m stuck aren’t i. Because this is not exactly fair and balanced moderating. Theres nothing wrong in that regards of criticizing the mod team and I wont deter anyone from using the report button. I dont like it when people take actions in their own hands. Quote: Let’s move onto “threatening behaviourâ€Â. That Russian dude was given a warning in regards to threatening messages he sent to me, but how come MunkE was let off the hook when he did something quite similar. “He was responding to the comments you made blah blah blah blahâ€Â. Threatening behaviour should not be condoned at any level Roid and should be treated a lot more harshly as opposed to “baitingâ€Â. Again, MunkE is given another “free passâ€Â. That must of been my comment to you about tame comments vs more aggressive comments. That Munk E comment must have escaped me and by the time I got the report which was like 25 hrs later and buried almost towards the third page. I didnt even notice it until today. Yes Ive sent MunkE a message concerning that 2 hrs prior to this post. In normal circumstance he would have received a warning for that and you too for comments you made about his wife but its kind of too late to warn someone 3 days later. Chip though knows next time he does it, he will get a warning Quote: All I ask when I return that there is a level in consistency in regards to the moderating on KJ in future, and I will do my best to leave people alone. We will try our best but human errors sometimes happen unconciously until we are made aware of it. I believe most of the issue going on is that theres not enough people to monitor the Cooler forums. We would probably going to add another mod for that forum to mediate things. Christian does a fine job of it but theres only so much one person can do |
Author: | Corpse [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 6:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
It can probably be locked now so no outside fights occur, I think getluv just wanted some feedback which Roid gave. |
Author: | El Maskado [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 6:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
its fine. I let jayhawk do the same with mineapple |
Author: | bABA [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 6:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
a) There are already thhreads on this. b) Hes banned. wait a week, then put your response. |
Author: | Gulli [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 6:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
You two stop backseat modding and let Roid do his job ![]() |
Author: | Rev [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 6:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
Gulli wrote: You two stop backseat modding and let Roid do his job ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Eagle [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 7:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
Gulli wrote: You two stop backseat modding and let Roid do his job ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Christian [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 7:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
Before this is locked, let me just say that I *do* remember seeing a report by getluv pertaining to the Box/Michael saga... however during that time, I was already busy fielding PMs from both parties trying to get a compromise so at least the claws can be controlled. |
Author: | neo_wolf [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
Corpse wrote: I think you are talking about Excel? ![]() I believe they are the same person or related in some way. ![]() |
Author: | Chippy [ Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
![]() |
Author: | paper [ Tue Jul 29, 2008 1:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
And people here tell me I'm the one always looking for attention? |
Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Tue Jul 29, 2008 7:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
Oh God, so much hoopla about a week of banning? Freaking c'mon!! *sigh* |
Author: | Riggs [ Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
![]() ![]() ![]() But he's right about Argos, just ban him. ![]() |
Author: | Argos [ Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
Hehe: Riggs. |
Author: | Michael. [ Tue Jul 29, 2008 3:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
Id like to say I'm going to try as best I can to make sure dino doesn't use la deli forums to attack users here, but i think and hope hes over it because i don't want that conflict to arise. |
Author: | Excel [ Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
Its damn online forum, how can somebody possibly care about it that much to have such cries for attention? Corpse wrote: I think you are talking about Excel? ![]() I think getluv, well, he does, live in a land called Oz. ![]() |
Author: | Corpse [ Wed Jul 30, 2008 11:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
TDK Ran Shit wrote: Its damn online forum, how can somebody possibly care about it that much to have such cries for attention? Corpse wrote: I think you are talking about Excel? ![]() I think getluv, well, he does, live in a land called Oz. ![]() I thought he was refering to that Australia thread. |
Author: | Rev [ Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: getluv's response |
Is there a catagory for saddest thread in the poster awards? |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |