World of KJ
http://worldofkj.com/forum/

Signatures that are TOO MUCH
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=12539		 Page 1 of 4
Author:  Maverikk [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 7:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Signatures that are TOO MUCH
Hey, I don't want to sound like I'm complaining, but there are a few members here who have started going overboard with the size of their sigs, and it hurts the eyes just to look at them. Isn't there some kind of limit that can be put on the size of the sigs that are allowed? If nobody else cares, I'll just shut up.
Author:  Rev [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 7:51 pm ]
Post subject: 
that one dude with the giant ass mi:3 logo and michael's sig come to mind.
Author:  zingy [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 7:54 pm ]
Post subject: 
I don't mind the small ones much, like dolce's one for the WOKJ IFF.

But, eh, whatever.
Author:  Maverikk [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 7:55 pm ]
Post subject: 
Zingaling wrote:
I don't mind the small ones much, like dolce's one for the WOKJ IFF.

But, eh, whatever.


Yes, dolce's is fine.
Author:  matatonio [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:23 pm ]
Post subject: 
is mine to big?! :unsure:
Author:  Schlomo [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:29 pm ]
Post subject: 
revolutions wrote:
that one dude with the giant ass mi:3 logo and michael's sig come to mind.


STFU...

Okay, okay, okay...I'll take it down

EDIT: how does it look now you sensitive hoes :tongue:
Author:  Maverikk [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:32 pm ]
Post subject: 
matatonio wrote:
is mine to big?! :unsure:


Yours is a little bit loud, yes. Any signature longer than 2 inches is a bit much on the eyes. It's the same as somebody POSTING EVERYTHING IN CAPITAL LETTERS IN EVERY POST. IT'S A BIT HARD TO LOOK AT AFTER AWHILE, AND WHEN MORE THAN A FEW START DOING IT, IT'S HEADACHE INDUCING.
Author:  matatonio [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:42 pm ]
Post subject: 
better!?...
Author:  bABA [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:45 pm ]
Post subject: 
name the people whos signatures are giving you a problem with. sorry but i work on high res so i can't always tell. so list the names down and let me know and i'll PM them myself. Thanks
Author:  Rev [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:50 pm ]
Post subject: 
Schlomo wrote:
revolutions wrote:
that one dude with the giant ass mi:3 logo and michael's sig come to mind.


STFU...

Okay, okay, okay...I'll take it down

EDIT: how does it look now you sensitive hoes :tongue:


:rofl:

much better ;)
Author:  Maverikk [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:58 pm ]
Post subject: 
bABA wrote:
name the people whos signatures are giving you a problem with. sorry but i work on high res so i can't always tell. so list the names down and let me know and i'll PM them myself. Thanks


I would have to compile a list, but Spider-Man, Moviegeek, Vincent, and Michael are 4 people that are going way overboard on signature size. Now I'll be labeled the bad guy for complaining and naming names. :nope:
Author:  dolcevita [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:00 pm ]
Post subject: 
But, but, Michael's is also a promo for the WOTK IFF :sad: Maybe if I got 100 people to join as moviegoers I would ask them to take them down. They only did it because I've been begging people to help promote the event. :sad:
Author:  Maverikk [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:02 pm ]
Post subject: 
dolcevita wrote:
But, but, Michael's is also a promo for the WOTK IFF :sad: Maybe if I got 100 people to join as moviegoers I would ask them to take them down. They only did it because I've been begging people to help promote the event. :sad:


You're promoting it, too, and you're not causing headaches with your sig at the same time. Can't he make his sig the same size as you and make everybody happy? :smile:
Author:  Impact [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:08 pm ]
Post subject: 
Is mine to small?
Author:  Maverikk [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:10 pm ]
Post subject: 
Impact wrote:
Is mine to small?


I'll bet that's not the first time you've asked that question. :hahaha:
Author:  Rev [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:12 pm ]
Post subject: 
Maverikk wrote:
Impact wrote:
Is mine to small?


I'll bet that's not the first time you've asked that question. :hahaha:



:lol: :tongue:
Author:  Impact [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:14 pm ]
Post subject: 
revolutions wrote:
Maverikk wrote:
Impact wrote:
Is mine to small?


I'll bet that's not the first time you've asked that question. :hahaha:



:lol: :tongue:
Nah you must be confusing me wiht someone else! :hahaha:
Author:  Mister Ecks [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:28 pm ]
Post subject: 
I stopped doing "pics in sigs" a while ago. I was probably one of the first to do it back at the start of KJ with my Jennifer Garner stuff. I did a few since then, but I don't put pics there anymore. Sometimes, it can be a bit much, but I don't mind a lot. If someone posted a huge-ass picture, it would be troublesome.
Author:  MGKC [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:41 pm ]
Post subject: 
I made a similar thread about 6 months ago pleading people not to use pictures in signatures. I'm not as against it now as I once was, but the huge ones still bother me. It's like pop-up ads annoying.

Vincent and Spider-Man come to mind.
Author:  bABA [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:51 pm ]
Post subject: 
well i do expect this thread to pop up once in a while.

i'll let michael's sig be for now only cause its for something a lot of people helped promote (in and outside the site).

Matatonio, your signature though, i think may be too wide for people with 800 by 600.

i'll look into the other signatures tomorrow.

everyone, please be careful with your signatures ... they can be annoying if they're too big (in width and in height) and it can become annoying if they are very flashy or are big gif files. examples of good gifs that come to mind are neo_wolf's dancing peple, while the file was big, it was easy on the eyes.
Author:  insomniacdude [ Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:15 am ]
Post subject: 
What about me? No image, but the quotes tags apprently add space for no reason.
Author:  Anonymous [ Mon Sep 12, 2005 10:06 am ]
Post subject: 
Sommie - here's a genius idea: instead of using quote tags, why not just say: "Ripper: A good leader knows when to give in and follow, and when to take charge; doing either 100% of the time makes one a bad leader and a bad follower." and so on.
Author:  El Maskado [ Mon Sep 12, 2005 1:59 pm ]
Post subject: 
I will say this, all Hillary Duff,Lindsay Lohen, the OC, and WB show banners should be banned
Author:  Mister Ecks [ Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:07 pm ]
Post subject: 
El_Masked_esteROIDe_user wrote:
I will say this, all Hillary Duff,Lindsay Lohen, the OC, and WB show banners should be banned


Well, that just about solves every KJ problem.
Author:  Impact [ Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:16 pm ]
Post subject: 
El_Masked_esteROIDe_user wrote:
I will say this, all Hillary Duff,Lindsay Lohen, the OC, and WB show banners should be banned
ahh what the heck how bout all banners (that arnt promoting kj) get banned!
Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/