Author |
Message |
tree and a half
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:38 am Posts: 2084
|
James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for women
James Cameron says Wonder Woman is a step backwards for female protagonistsThe social justice warriors are going to hate having the truth pointed out to them by Cameron. Quote: "All of the self-congratulatory back-patting Hollywood’s been doing over Wonder Woman has been so misguided. She’s an objectified icon, and it’s just male Hollywood doing the same old thing! I’m not saying I didn’t like the movie but, to me, it’s a step backwards. Sarah Connor was not a beauty icon. She was strong, she was troubled, she was a terrible mother, and she earned the respect of the audience through pure grit. And to me, [the benefit of characters like Sarah] is so obvious. I mean, half the audience is female!
I don’t – I don’t know. There are many women in power in Hollywood and they do get to guide and shape what films get made. I think – no, I can’t account for it. Because how many times do I have to demonstrate the same thing over again? I feel like I’m shouting in a wind tunnel!"
|
Fri Aug 25, 2017 6:45 am |
|
|
stuffp
Keeping it Light
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 8:06 am Posts: 11204 Location: Bright Falls
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Cameron is always right, except for his endorsement on Terminator Genisys.
|
Fri Aug 25, 2017 7:47 am |
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 67043
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
SJWs will love this, what are you talking about? They scour the Internet looking for things to trigger their Tweets.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Fri Aug 25, 2017 8:04 am |
|
|
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm Posts: 20346 Location: Where they shot Knock at the Cabin
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
"Boo hoo! Wonder Woman is hotter and better than the average woman! She should be obese with blue hair and hate men!"
|
Fri Aug 25, 2017 9:31 am |
|
|
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32104 Location: the last free city
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Quote: Patty Jenkins’ response to James Cameron.....“James Cameron's inability to understand what Wonder Woman is, or stands for, to women all over the world is unsurprising as, though he is a great filmmaker, he is not a woman. Strong women are great. His praise for my film Monster, and our portrayal of a strong yet damaged woman was so appreciated. But if women have to always be hard, tough and troubled to be strong, and we aren't free to be multidimensional or celebrate an icon of women everywhere because she is attractive and loving, then we haven't come very far have we. I believe women can and should be EVERYTHING just like male lead characters should be. There is no right and wrong kind of powerful woman. And the massive female audience who made the film a hit it is, can surely choose and judge their own icons of progress.”
_________________ Is it 2024 yet?
|
Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:06 am |
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 67043
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
It would have been better if she had just ignored what he said. This back-and-forth in the media is so infantile. It's like something the US President would do on Twitter, not normal people.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:26 am |
|
|
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32104 Location: the last free city
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Algren wrote: It would have been better if she had just ignored what he said. This back-and-forth in the media is so infantile. It's like something the US President would do on Twitter, not normal people.
_________________ Is it 2024 yet?
|
Fri Aug 25, 2017 11:07 am |
|
|
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21641 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Do people actually think WW did something for women? Part of the movies charm is how unimpactful it is.
_________________Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:36 pm |
|
|
Price
Gamaur's sex slave
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:15 pm Posts: 8889 Location: Los Pollos Hermanos
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Thegun wrote: Do people actually think WW did something for women?
_________________
|
Fri Aug 25, 2017 2:27 pm |
|
|
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Wow, look at all the men mansplaining to women what the movie means.
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com
|
Fri Aug 25, 2017 9:53 pm |
|
|
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32104 Location: the last free city
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Groucho wrote: Wow, look at all the men mansplaining to women what the movie means. right
_________________ Is it 2024 yet?
|
Sat Aug 26, 2017 1:17 am |
|
|
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21641 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
If that was the case, why aren't any women stepping up? Cameron would have been crushed in an hour.
And also fuck Cameron. The whole thing is ludicrous. Make your next film already. Why is he even commenting?
_________________Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Sat Aug 26, 2017 2:45 am |
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 67043
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
That's all it took for Thegun to back down. lol
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sat Aug 26, 2017 3:36 am |
|
|
tree and a half
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:38 am Posts: 2084
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Groucho wrote: Wow, look at all the men mansplaining to women what the movie means. Wow, look at the gender binarist binarsplaining to the gender spectrum what gender identity means.
|
Sat Aug 26, 2017 9:56 am |
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 67043
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
I bet Chippy wishes he did not say he would no longer post. This topic is right up his alley.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sat Aug 26, 2017 11:15 am |
|
|
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21641 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Algren wrote: That's all it took for Thegun to back down. lol Back down from what? I wasn't the ones mansplaining that Groucho was referring to, I was adding to his and my point.
_________________Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Sat Aug 26, 2017 11:43 am |
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 67043
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Thegun wrote: Do people actually think WW did something for women? Part of the movies charm is how unimpactful it is. Yeah ok
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sat Aug 26, 2017 11:46 am |
|
|
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28293 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
If only we knew what it was like to be married to a man who knocks other films for their portrayal of women while touting their own ability to portray strong, independent females on screen! Wait, let me check out if Joss Whedon's ex has anything to say about it...
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:46 pm |
|
|
FILMO
The Original
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 10:19 am Posts: 9808 Location: Suisse
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Yeah James.....the world needs more addict single mothers with violence issues like Sarah Connor.
_________________Libs wrote: FILMO, I'd rather have you eat chocolate syrup off my naked body than be a moderator here.
|
Sat Aug 26, 2017 1:30 pm |
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 67043
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Wonder Woman is only good for women because it has "Woman" in the title. Otherwise, it's no different than any other film about women. She was only powerful because she has superpowers, and she is pretty. She has no personality, and is mostly the butt of every awkward joke. Is that really empowering for women in 2017? The film and its subsequent buzz was all a bit of a con really. Females felt forced to support it because it's a female superhero film made by a female. There you go, Groucho.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sat Aug 26, 2017 7:14 pm |
|
|
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11009 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
While there always has been a weird kinkiness to Wonder Woman, DC has so much more female representation in its lore than the "socially progressive" Marvel outside of X-Men. This just reeks of jealousy.
_________________
|
Sun Aug 27, 2017 9:55 am |
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 67043
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Because when people don't notice, they really don't want female superheroes. When they are forced (made to feel guilty) to care, then we get Wonder Woman making $400m.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sun Aug 27, 2017 10:13 am |
|
|
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Algren wrote: Because when people don't notice, they really don't want female superheroes. When they are forced (made to feel guilty) to care, then we get Wonder Woman making $400m. The fact that it's a good movie has nothing to do with it, of course. I blogged about this when the film came out. https://ventrellaquest.com/2017/06/04/w ... hollywood/
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com
|
Sun Aug 27, 2017 10:56 am |
|
|
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 67043
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Groucho wrote: Algren wrote: Because when people don't notice, they really don't want female superheroes. When they are forced (made to feel guilty) to care, then we get Wonder Woman making $400m. The fact that it's a good movie has nothing to do with it, of course. Exactly.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sun Aug 27, 2017 11:50 am |
|
|
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11009 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
Re: James Cameron points out WW is a step backwards for wome
Fury Road, Wonder Woman, Force Awakens, I think we can stop with the novelty argument, it's becoming the norm the last couple of years
_________________
|
Sun Aug 27, 2017 1:39 pm |
|
|