World of KJ http://worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
Star Wars http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=83776 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Flava'd vs The World [ Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Star Wars |
Am I crazy or is the backlash greatly improving this movie’s chances of being nominated? The academy could piss off nerds and trumpers, the two groups they hate the most at the same time. And Star Wars is very inclusive, celebrates diversity and promotes other liberal values while deconstructing our code of ethics. It’s kind of the perfect storm and the only thing holding it back is its title. |
Author: | Algren [ Sat Dec 23, 2017 5:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
Author: | Darth Indiana Bond [ Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
I thought about that as well. It is the first Star Wars movie that asks its audience to think about the material it presents. But that damn casino planet |
Author: | Rev [ Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
Darth Indiana Bond wrote: But that damn casino planet PETA's version of Star Wars |
Author: | tree and a half [ Sat Dec 23, 2017 10:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
Darth Indiana Bond wrote: It is the first Star Wars movie that asks its audience to think about the material it presents. |
Author: | zwackerm [ Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
It will get similar nominations to TFA and nothing else. |
Author: | Darth Indiana Bond [ Sat Dec 23, 2017 1:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
tree and a half wrote: Darth Indiana Bond wrote: It is the first Star Wars movie that asks its audience to think about the material it presents. I know, even Empire and all it's magic was more about the placement of the hero's journey in a new context vs asking us to question the hero's journey itself And yeah, maybe some tech noms and that is it, too much weakness overall in the film |
Author: | Price [ Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
It's more likely to be the first Star Wars movie to win the Razzie for worst picture. |
Author: | Darth Indiana Bond [ Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
I doubt it. |
Author: | Rev [ Sat Dec 23, 2017 4:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
Price wrote: It's more likely to be the first Star Wars movie to win the Razzie for worst picture. FUCK YOU!!!! |
Author: | Price [ Sun Dec 24, 2017 6:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
Rev wrote: Price wrote: It's more likely to be the first Star Wars movie to win the Razzie for worst picture. FUCK YOU!!!! Search your feelings. You know it to be true. |
Author: | Darth Indiana Bond [ Sun Dec 24, 2017 7:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
Have we finally lost you Magnus to the Alt-Star Wars fans? |
Author: | Flava'd vs The World [ Sun Dec 24, 2017 1:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
TFA was not politicized by backlash from “angry white men.” Plus Star Wars promotes diversity more than Wonder Woman. It actually does carry the liberal agenda WW was accused of. |
Author: | Darth Indiana Bond [ Sun Dec 24, 2017 1:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
What is the name of the casino planet again? |
Author: | zwackerm [ Sun Dec 24, 2017 2:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
Darth Indiana Bond wrote: What is the name of the casino planet again? Canto Bight |
Author: | Darth Indiana Bond [ Sun Dec 24, 2017 2:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
That planet alone will keep this from sniffing Oscar gold |
Author: | Price [ Sun Dec 24, 2017 2:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
Flava'd vs The World wrote: TFA was not politicized by backlash from “angry white men.” Plus Star Wars promotes diversity more than Wonder Woman. It actually does carry the liberal agenda WW was accused of. Most of the backlash I'm seeing online has nothing to do with diversity or any agenda, it's more about the disregard to Luke's persona from the previous film, an unnecessary 30 minutes subplot that could have been edited out and it wouldn't have changed the movie, questions posed in the previous film not being answered (Snoke, Rey's parents), Phasma wasted again, ... |
Author: | Jmart [ Fri Dec 29, 2017 1:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
Price wrote: Flava'd vs The World wrote: TFA was not politicized by backlash from “angry white men.” Plus Star Wars promotes diversity more than Wonder Woman. It actually does carry the liberal agenda WW was accused of. Most of the backlash I'm seeing online has nothing to do with diversity or any agenda, it's more about the disregard to Luke's persona from the previous film, an unnecessary 30 minutes subplot that could have been edited out and it wouldn't have changed the movie, questions posed in the previous film not being answered (Snoke, Rey's parents), Phasma wasted again, ... Wow are people stupid. You'd think some people would've paid attention to the damn thing. |
Author: | Darth Indiana Bond [ Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Star Wars |
People wanted a movie that glorifies Luke and move on. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |