http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/more-t ... ure-gaffe/
32.9m viewers is still above the 2008 broadcast, no?
I forgot the 2014 broadcast was so high, though. Damn!
| World of KJ http://worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| The Oscar Ratings Could... http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=81619 |
Page 2 of 2 |
| Author: | zwackerm [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 2:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Oscar Ratings Could... |
Chippy wrote: Literally nobody has ever said that. It's not their fault you have a little pea brain that can't understand words. You never cease to amaze me. |
|
| Author: | Jmart [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 10:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Oscar Ratings Could... |
zwackerm wrote: I don't need to be talked to like a child. You kind of do because you kind of are. |
|
| Author: | Jack Sparrow [ Tue Feb 28, 2017 10:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Oscar Ratings Could... |
I think a lot of ratings has to do with people watching them online as well. I am sure its worldwide broadcast has gone bigger. |
|
| Author: | Jiffy [ Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Oscar Ratings Could... |
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/more-t ... ure-gaffe/ 32.9m viewers is still above the 2008 broadcast, no? I forgot the 2014 broadcast was so high, though. Damn!
|
|
| Author: | zwackerm [ Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Oscar Ratings Could... |
The original numbers said 29.07. |
|
| Author: | Jiffy [ Fri Mar 03, 2017 6:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Oscar Ratings Could... |
zwackerm wrote: The original numbers said 29.07. I know, I'm just sayin'. |
|
| Author: | i.hope [ Fri Mar 03, 2017 9:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Oscar Ratings Could... |
zwackerm wrote: The original numbers said 29.07. Live telecast usually adjusts up in ratings. |
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|