| World of KJ http://worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| Which SAG winner will lose the Oscar? http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=4180 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Alex Y. [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which SAG winner will lose the Oscar? |
Since the beginning of SAG Awards, at least one SAG winner went on to lose the oscar. (People who won an SAG w/o the Oscar, from a thread in OW): 2003 - Best Actor Johnny Depp 2002 - Best Actor Daniel Day Lewis -------- Best Actress Renee Zellweger -------- Best Supporting Actor Christopher Walken 2001 - Best Actor Russell Crowe -------- Best Supporting Actor Ian McKellen -------- Best Supporting Actress Helen Mirren* 2000 - Best Supporting Actor Albert Finney* -------- Best Supporting Actress Judi Dench 1999 - Best Actress Annette Bening 1998 - Best Supporting Actor Robert Duvall -------- Best Supporting Actress Kathy Bates 1997 - Best Supporting Actress Gloria Stuart* 1996 - Best Supporting Actress Lauren Bacall 1995 - Best Supporting Actor Ed Harris -------- Best Supporting Actress Kate Winslet 1994 - Best Actress Jodie Foster Who will it be this year? Could there be more than one? Personally, I think Swank is the most likely of the four SAG winners to lose. |
|
| Author: | Maverikk [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Those are all my picks to win the Oscar. |
|
| Author: | matatonio [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
they all have a great chance of winning, but if i got to pick one ive picked Morgan Freeman! |
|
| Author: | MovieDude [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Maybe Cate Blanchett, that's it though. |
|
| Author: | Maverikk [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
MovieDude wrote: Maybe Cate Blanchett, that's it though. I think she has the biggest chance of not winning of the group, but I don't see it happening. That would really not make it look too good for The Aviator early in the show, because Alda and Leo aren't going to win. The Aviator HAS to take the one acting award it's favored to take, or Marty's eyebrows might give birth. #-o |
|
| Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hilary Swank for the reasons that I've stated on numerous occasions and also for the mere fact that the three others look like more certain bets. |
|
| Author: | andaroo1 [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Blanchett is probably the weakest link, with Madsen taking up her place if Sidways is more loved than we all think. Freeman is next, because Hayden Church (not Clive Owen, sorry you guys, the Globes is not an indicator). Then Swank, with the only other runner being Benning. Staunton can't win, sorry guys. Then Foxx... well... if a meteor hits the Earth and the Awards are stopped, Jamie will sadly never get his Oscar. |
|
| Author: | torrino [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I don't think Swank or Foxx will lose. It'll probably be one of the Supporting Role winners, perhaps both (it seems that the two from Closer and Sideways, Freeman, and Blanchett all have chances...those two categories are perhaps the hardest to predict... |
|
| Author: | Atoddr [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think Freeman is the most likely to lose. After that, I would go with Blanchett, which would be a shame because she is the best thing about The Aviator. But I wouldn't be surprised if the winners were all the same. |
|
| Author: | Goldie [ Mon Feb 07, 2005 12:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dr. Lecter wrote: Hilary Swank for the reasons that I've stated on numerous occasions and also for the mere fact that the three others look like more certain bets. Blah, blah, blah - I can see you are going to carry this ERROR IN REASONING WITH HALF ASS LOGIC all the way to the Oscar telecast. Anyone know how to get through to a ](*,) #-o . And since this bloated analysis took place without even seeing the movie or the performance - blah, blah, blah.  ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)
|
|
| Author: | Goldie [ Mon Feb 07, 2005 8:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
andaroo wrote: Blanchett is probably the weakest link, with Madsen taking up her place if Sidways is more loved than we all think. Freeman is next, because Hayden Church (not Clive Owen, sorry you guys, the Globes is not an indicator). Then Swank, with the only other runner being Benning. Staunton can't win, sorry guys. Then Foxx... well... if a meteor hits the Earth and the Awards are stopped, Jamie will sadly never get his Oscar. I agree as I think the supporting categories has the most chances for the upsets. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Goldie wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Hilary Swank for the reasons that I've stated on numerous occasions and also for the mere fact that the three others look like more certain bets. Blah, blah, blah - I can see you are going to carry this ERROR IN REASONING WITH HALF ASS LOGIC all the way to the Oscar telecast. Anyone know how to get through to a ](*,) #-o . And since this bloated analysis took place without even seeing the movie or the performance - blah, blah, blah. ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)I suggest you suicide 
|
|
| Author: | Chris [ Mon Feb 07, 2005 7:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I have a feeling (maybe hope) that Cate will lose. Hilary might also lose too. She was predicted to win the SAG because she lost in in 1999, and she won the Globe, but so did Annette. I think a split between them will give it to Imelda Stauton. The Academy obviously liked the film to give it three major nominations, and this will be a good way to pay it its dues. M$B will likely win a few others, and since Hilary already has one, they may feel like not giving it to her. |
|
| Author: | Goldie [ Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dr. Lecter wrote: Goldie wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Hilary Swank for the reasons that I've stated on numerous occasions and also for the mere fact that the three others look like more certain bets. Blah, blah, blah - I can see you are going to carry this ERROR IN REASONING WITH HALF ASS LOGIC all the way to the Oscar telecast. Anyone know how to get through to a ](*,) #-o . And since this bloated analysis took place without even seeing the movie or the performance - blah, blah, blah. ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)I suggest you suicide The only thing that is committing suicide is your Oscar picks on Oscar night. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Goldie wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Goldie wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Hilary Swank for the reasons that I've stated on numerous occasions and also for the mere fact that the three others look like more certain bets. Blah, blah, blah - I can see you are going to carry this ERROR IN REASONING WITH HALF ASS LOGIC all the way to the Oscar telecast. Anyone know how to get through to a ](*,) #-o . And since this bloated analysis took place without even seeing the movie or the performance - blah, blah, blah. ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)I suggest you suicide The only thing that is committing suicide is your Oscar picks on Oscar night. Not you? 
|
|
| Author: | Tyler [ Fri Feb 25, 2005 12:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
They will all win the Oscar, I'm thinking. Blanchett is the iffiest of the bunch, but she's owed and the only Aviator actor who has a chance of winning. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|