Author |
Message |
publicenemy#1
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am Posts: 18890 Location: San Diego
|
Wednesday #s
Ralph Breaks the Internet - 18.5m
|
Thu Nov 22, 2018 11:52 am |
|
|
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 9148 Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
Re: Wednesday #s
publicenemy#1 wrote: Ralph Breaks the Internet - 18.5m Incredible. A big surprise even with the original being well liked.$100m 5-day in play.
_________________ Making Predictions Great Again!
|
Thu Nov 22, 2018 12:25 pm |
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm Posts: 13041 Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
|
Re: Wednesday #s
Some more:
$7.05m Grinch $3.16m Robin Hood $2.88m Bohemian Rhapsody $1.21m Widows $0.91m Green Book $0.54m Nutcracker
_________________ Nothing Compares 2 U
|
Thu Nov 22, 2018 12:30 pm |
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm Posts: 13041 Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
|
Re: Wednesday #s
$6.90m Fantastic Beasts 2
So FB2 fell behind The Grinch yesterday...
_________________ Nothing Compares 2 U
|
Thu Nov 22, 2018 12:37 pm |
|
|
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 9148 Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
Re: Wednesday #s
That seems pretty terrible for Widows?
_________________ Making Predictions Great Again!
|
Thu Nov 22, 2018 12:45 pm |
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm Posts: 13041 Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
|
Re: Wednesday #s
It is... that's $8.5m for the 5 days...
_________________ Nothing Compares 2 U
|
Thu Nov 22, 2018 12:50 pm |
|
|
Flava'd vs The World
The Kramer
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:36 am Posts: 23817 Location: Classified
|
Re: Wednesday #s
$11.6M for Creed. The box office is back!
|
Thu Nov 22, 2018 12:50 pm |
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm Posts: 13041 Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
|
Re: Wednesday #s
1 - Ralph Breaks the Internet BV $18,500,000 - - 4,017 $4,605 $18,500,000 1 2 - Creed 2 MGM $11,600,000 - - 3,359 $3,453 $11,600,000 13 2 Dr. Seuss' The Grinch (2018) Uni. $7,047,000 +4% +165% 3,960 $1,780 $145,471,250 13 4 1 Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald WB $6,900,000 -1% - 4,163 $1,657 $81,097,238 6 5 - Robin Hood (2018) LG/S $3,160,000 - - 2,827 $1,118 $3,160,000 16 3 Bohemian Rhapsody Fox $2,885,000 +16% +29% 3,076 $938 $135,524,253 20 7 4 Instant Family Par. $2,315,000 -1% - 3,286 $705 $20,641,508 6 8 5 Widows Fox $1,215,000 -21% - 2,803 $433 $16,225,819 6 9 - Green Book Uni. $908,000 +2,230% - 1,063 $854 $1,308,401 610 7 A Star is Born (2018) WB $550,000 -8% -21% 1,350 $407 $187,475,173 48 11 6 The Nutcracker and the Four Realms BV $542,000 -36% +17% 1,757 $308 $45,975,698 20 https://www.boxofficemojo.com/daily/cha ... -21&p=.htm
_________________ Nothing Compares 2 U
|
Thu Nov 22, 2018 12:52 pm |
|
|
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm Posts: 20365 Location: Where they shot Knock at the Cabin
|
Re: Wednesday #s
mark66 wrote: $6.90m Fantastic Beasts 2
So FB2 fell behind The Grinch yesterday... Grinch will fall more today and increase more Friday, so the two will be neck and neck this weekend.
|
Thu Nov 22, 2018 12:53 pm |
|
|
publicenemy#1
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am Posts: 18890 Location: San Diego
|
Re: Wednesday #s
900k for Green Book is pretty poor.
|
Thu Nov 22, 2018 1:52 pm |
|
|
Dil
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:48 pm Posts: 8942 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Re: Wednesday #s
Fantastic numbers for Ralph and Creed 2. Both should be posting some huge numbers over the next couple of days. Embarrassing as expected for Robin Hood though.
|
Thu Nov 22, 2018 1:52 pm |
|
|
publicenemy#1
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am Posts: 18890 Location: San Diego
|
Re: Wednesday #s
Omg Girl in the Spider's Web might not even hit $15m lolol
That is one of the biggest misfires I can think of. Shame, it's not bad.
|
Thu Nov 22, 2018 1:54 pm |
|
|
Magic Mike
Wallflower
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am Posts: 34876 Location: Minnesota
|
Re: Wednesday #s
Excellent for The Grinch with Ralph over-performing so much.
|
Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:48 pm |
|
|
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am Posts: 34865 Location: Maryland
|
Re: Wednesday #s
publicenemy#1 wrote: Omg Girl in the Spider's Web might not even hit $15m lolol
That is one of the biggest misfires I can think of. Shame, it's not bad. It's almost an amusing situation. The it's-too-long, it's-too-difficult, it's-too-grim one made 100m, and then they retooled everything to streamline it into a franchise-ready action movie with a the-nukes-are-in-play! plot...and it is going to struggle to 15 million.
_________________1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
Fri Nov 23, 2018 2:17 am |
|
|
Barrabás
llegó a la casa vía marítima
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm Posts: 6144 Location: la gran casa de la esquina
|
Re: Wednesday #s
Fincher's Dragon Tattoo was pretty good. I would have watched another one and I'm sure enough people would have to justify it. It didn't have to cost $100m again either, that was a ridiculous budget for the type of film it was in the first place.
Robin Hood also cost $100m, it's a massive bomb. Audiences really don't seem to care about films set in medieval times, they've been flopping since the mid 2000s (remember King Arthur and Kingdom of Heaven?).
_________________ .
|
Fri Nov 23, 2018 2:48 am |
|
|
Flava'd vs The World
The Kramer
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:36 am Posts: 23817 Location: Classified
|
Re: Wednesday #s
I feel like every year we get a movie or two trying to capitalize on Game of Thrones’ massive success, but every year audiences say “we just want more Game Of Thrones.”
|
Fri Nov 23, 2018 3:10 am |
|
|
Magic Mike
Wallflower
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am Posts: 34876 Location: Minnesota
|
Re: Wednesday #s
Barrabás wrote: Fincher's Dragon Tattoo was pretty good. I would have watched another one and I'm sure enough people would have to justify it. It didn't have to cost $100m again either, that was a ridiculous budget for the type of film it was in the first place.
I think so too. A true follow-up never would have bombed like this.
|
Sat Nov 24, 2018 1:42 am |
|
|
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21647 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Re: Wednesday #s
Was the Daniel Craig film that much of a hit? From what I remember it barely broke even, hence why they never made a sequel. This cost almost 90 million less. And what it'll do 110 WW on a 42 million budget. It's smaller in scale but the dividends are really not that much different.
_________________Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Sat Nov 24, 2018 3:13 pm |
|
|
publicenemy#1
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am Posts: 18890 Location: San Diego
|
Re: Wednesday #s
It's at 27m WW right now...
|
Sat Nov 24, 2018 3:17 pm |
|
|
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am Posts: 34865 Location: Maryland
|
Re: Wednesday #s
If the brand has a future outside novels, Netflix or Amazon should develop a Lisbeth Salander series. I could imagine a successful television series based on the character. One mystery per season. Perhaps newly developed mysteries using the elements people most associate with the character--serial murders, cold-case mysteries, sexual deviants, right-wing/"men's-rights"-obsessed extremists--instead of Spider's Web's Mission: Impossible-style MacGuffin.
_________________1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
Sat Nov 24, 2018 4:19 pm |
|
|
DP07
Homo Dperious
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 14501 Location: Everywhere
|
Re: Wednesday #s
David wrote: publicenemy#1 wrote: Omg Girl in the Spider's Web might not even hit $15m lolol
That is one of the biggest misfires I can think of. Shame, it's not bad. It's almost an amusing situation. The it's-too-long, it's-too-difficult, it's-too-grim one made 100m, and then they retooled everything to streamline it into a franchise-ready action movie with a the-nukes-are-in-play! plot...and it is going to struggle to 15 million. Maybe this is based off mission impossible, but the movie doesn’t feel like the nukes are in play.
|
Tue Nov 27, 2018 3:49 am |
|
|
DP07
Homo Dperious
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 14501 Location: Everywhere
|
Re: Wednesday #s
Barrabás wrote: Fincher's Dragon Tattoo was pretty good. I would have watched another one and I'm sure enough people would have to justify it. It didn't have to cost $100m again either, that was a ridiculous budget for the type of film it was in the first place.
Robin Hood also cost $100m, it's a massive bomb. Audiences really don't seem to care about films set in medieval times, they've been flopping since the mid 2000s (remember King Arthur and Kingdom of Heaven?). For all the blockbuster brands, Robin Hood and King Arthur didn’t do well. You could add Peter Pan; maybe they are too old.
|
Tue Nov 27, 2018 3:57 am |
|
|
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am Posts: 22690 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
Re: Wednesday #s
The 1991 version was a huge hit and the 2010 version (though unnecessary) didn't do too badly. There was just no need for another.
_________________
What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934
|
Tue Nov 27, 2018 6:35 am |
|
|
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm Posts: 20365 Location: Where they shot Knock at the Cabin
|
Re: Wednesday #s
DP07 wrote: Barrabás wrote: Fincher's Dragon Tattoo was pretty good. I would have watched another one and I'm sure enough people would have to justify it. It didn't have to cost $100m again either, that was a ridiculous budget for the type of film it was in the first place.
Robin Hood also cost $100m, it's a massive bomb. Audiences really don't seem to care about films set in medieval times, they've been flopping since the mid 2000s (remember King Arthur and Kingdom of Heaven?). For all the blockbuster brands, Robin Hood and King Arthur didn’t do well. You could add Peter Pan; maybe they are too old. But Tarzan did do well. Go figure
|
Tue Nov 27, 2018 9:30 am |
|
|