World of KJ http://worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
Weekend Actuals http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=5229 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Anonymous [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 4:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Weekend Actuals |
The Pacifier $30.55m Be Cool $23.45m Hitch $12.12m Diary of a Mad Black Woman $11.03m Million Dollar Baby $8.14m Constantine $6.13m Cursed $3.87m Man of the House $3.51m Because of Winn-Dixie $3.20m The Jacket $2.72m |
Author: | Andrew [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
wow, i'm impressed the pacifier managed to stay above $30million, good number for M$B but i had hoped for more. |
Author: | Rev [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
damn you to hell Vinny ![]() |
Author: | Jeff [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Diary of a Mad Black Woman dropped almost $1 million from estimates. Quite a drop for the film, not that it wasn't expected though. |
Author: | zingy [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Fantastic for The Pacifier. It managed to remain above $30 million. |
Author: | neo_wolf [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Good numbers for TP,Hitch and Be cool. M$B also did good but i expected more. |
Author: | Libs [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
The Pacifier went up from its estimate, which is nice to see for a change. Be Cool was on-target, as well. |
Author: | Spidey [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Box Office Mojo numbers are up: http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2005&wknd=09&p=.htm |
Author: | Joker's Thug #3 [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
M$B better keep steady next weekend and fall no more then 15%, thats not such a good increase. |
Author: | Jeff [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Only 10% for Million Dollar Baby is dissapointing, however the film still has a relatively good chance at $100 million. |
Author: | Spidey [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Remember M$B is targeted for the adult audience and they don't go and rush out to see a movie, even if it won some big Oscars. This is not LOTR. |
Author: | Joker's Thug #3 [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
RogueCommander wrote: Only 10% for Million Dollar Baby is dissapointing, however the film still has a relatively good chance at $100 million. |
Author: | Libs [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Spiderman2005 wrote: Remember M$B is targeted for the adult audience and they don't go and rush out to see a movie, even if it won some big Oscars. This is not LOTR. Million Dollar Baby has been out since January. It's not "rushing out to see it" in March. |
Author: | Spidey [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Libs wrote: Spiderman2005 wrote: Remember M$B is targeted for the adult audience and they don't go and rush out to see a movie, even if it won some big Oscars. This is not LOTR. Million Dollar Baby has been out since January. It's not "rushing out to see it" in March. It just won some big Oscars. I am saying the audience is not rushing out to see it AFTER it won some Oscars. |
Author: | Libs [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 8:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Spiderman2005 wrote: Libs wrote: Spiderman2005 wrote: Remember M$B is targeted for the adult audience and they don't go and rush out to see a movie, even if it won some big Oscars. This is not LOTR. Million Dollar Baby has been out since January. It's not "rushing out to see it" in March. It just won some big Oscars. I am saying the audience is not rushing out to see it AFTER it won some Oscars. But you can't talk about Return of the King when you're pointing that out, as Oscars hardly caused that movie to make the amount of money it did. |
Author: | Anonymous [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 8:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Libs wrote: Spiderman2005 wrote: Libs wrote: Spiderman2005 wrote: Remember M$B is targeted for the adult audience and they don't go and rush out to see a movie, even if it won some big Oscars. This is not LOTR. Million Dollar Baby has been out since January. It's not "rushing out to see it" in March. It just won some big Oscars. I am saying the audience is not rushing out to see it AFTER it won some Oscars. But you can't talk about Return of the King when you're pointing that out, as Oscars hardly caused that movie to make the amount of money it did. We'll be able to further debate the M$B issue when whatever wins next year increases by 30 or 40%. |
Author: | Jeff [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
All this talk of Million Dollar Baby makes me want to see it again. Maybe next week. |
Author: | sako [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Good for the Pacifier, but I find M$B very dissappointing, I was expecting atleast 30% increase, but maybe it can hold well and make 100m. |
Author: | MGKC [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 11:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
You guys are forgetting it increased last weekend as well. It would have been around $6.4 with a light decline like the Aviator, making this weekend's increase around 27%. |
Author: | Lucky [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 11:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
MDBs 10.8% Oscar boost is among the lowest in recent years and this is for a film that added 225 theaters. MDB would have dropped after the Oscars without the added theaters. When Oscar noms were announced The Aviator bounced up 56% and road it's Oscar float for weeks with soft drops despite losing hundreds of theaters each week. With no Oscar float and no big holidays it will be interesting to see how MDB holds up. |
Author: | Jeff [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 11:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Killuminati510 wrote: RogueCommander wrote: Only 10% for Million Dollar Baby is dissapointing, however the film still has a relatively good chance at $100 million. Good point. The Aviator also had an Oscar-nom bounce though. |
Author: | bABA [ Mon Mar 07, 2005 11:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Lucky wrote: MDBs 10.8% Oscar boost is among the lowest in recent years and this is for a film that added 225 theaters. MDB would have dropped after the Oscars without the added theaters. When Oscar noms were announced The Aviator bounced up 56% and road it's Oscar float for weeks with soft drops despite losing hundreds of theaters each week. With no Oscar float and no big holidays it will be interesting to see how MDB holds up. you know .. i never really did check up on the boosts. what was rotk? for a fan based flick and with so much frontloadedness, how much did it increase? |
Author: | Lucky [ Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:05 am ] |
Post subject: | |
bABA wrote: Lucky wrote: MDBs 10.8% Oscar boost is among the lowest in recent years and this is for a film that added 225 theaters. MDB would have dropped after the Oscars without the added theaters. When Oscar noms were announced The Aviator bounced up 56% and road it's Oscar float for weeks with soft drops despite losing hundreds of theaters each week. With no Oscar float and no big holidays it will be interesting to see how MDB holds up. you know .. i never really did check up on the boosts. what was rotk? for a fan based flick and with so much frontloadedness, how much did it increase? If you look at BOMs article he looks at the Oscar boosts for the film that had not reached $100 mil by Oscar night; Shakespeare in Love, Shindler's List and The English Patient. Those films had post Oscar boosts of 44%, 53% and 50%. A boost of 11% for MDB is really low. Even Chicago bounced 17% after the Oscars. |
Author: | Joker's Thug #3 [ Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:11 am ] |
Post subject: | |
bABA wrote: Lucky wrote: MDBs 10.8% Oscar boost is among the lowest in recent years and this is for a film that added 225 theaters. MDB would have dropped after the Oscars without the added theaters. When Oscar noms were announced The Aviator bounced up 56% and road it's Oscar float for weeks with soft drops despite losing hundreds of theaters each week. With no Oscar float and no big holidays it will be interesting to see how MDB holds up. you know .. i never really did check up on the boosts. what was rotk? for a fan based flick and with so much frontloadedness, how much did it increase? |
Author: | Kris K [ Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:09 am ] |
Post subject: | |
This is brilliant, PACIFIER remained over $30M and BE COOL stayed steady. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |