World of KJ
http://worldofkj.com/forum/

Britney Spears ... the soon to be mother ... nude
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=4147
Page 1 of 3

Author:  Eagle [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 9:27 am ]
Post subject:  Britney Spears ... the soon to be mother ... nude

http://gorillamask.net/bsnaked.shtml

Yeh ... way to go britney ...

Author:  xXVincentxX [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 10:06 am ]
Post subject: 

I'm not very impressed. That facial expression looks like a poodle.

Author:  Mister Ecks [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 10:54 am ]
Post subject: 

For Christ's sake. Even when she appears like a drunk slut, she's still a goddamn tease.

Author:  Algren [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 11:00 am ]
Post subject: 

Ugly

Author:  xXVincentxX [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 11:16 am ]
Post subject: 

Algren wrote:
Ugly


Yeah, she looks like she hasn't taken a shower for days, and her hair is out of control, and that facial expression is just fugly.

Author:  Mister Ecks [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 11:18 am ]
Post subject: 

Pinkpanther wrote:
Algren wrote:
Ugly


Yeah, she looks like she hasn't taken a shower for days, and her hair is out of control, and that facial expression is just fugly.


Futt bugly ugly... wait a minute... confusion.

Author:  xXVincentxX [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 11:20 am ]
Post subject: 

Mr. X wrote:
Pinkpanther wrote:
Algren wrote:
Ugly


Yeah, she looks like she hasn't taken a shower for days, and her hair is out of control, and that facial expression is just fugly.


Futt bugly ugly... wait a minute... confusion.


lol I don't think Britney is ugly. I just think that picture doesn't do her psychical appearance justice.

Author:  Anonymous [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 11:30 am ]
Post subject: 

Old. And third one is fake.

Author:  Mister Ecks [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 11:30 am ]
Post subject: 

Pinkpanther wrote:
Mr. X wrote:
Pinkpanther wrote:
Algren wrote:
Ugly


Yeah, she looks like she hasn't taken a shower for days, and her hair is out of control, and that facial expression is just fugly.


Futt bugly ugly... wait a minute... confusion.


lol I don't think Britney is ugly. I just think that picture doesn't do her psychical appearance justice.


Yeah, that's what I meant, too. She looks good in magazines and at awards show. But usually these balcony shots (there are a few floating around) don't do her any justice at all.

Author:  Algren [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 11:36 am ]
Post subject: 

She is ugly. That is her natural. i do not call beauty when people have make-up on to enhance theyre appearance. When she has no make-up on, she is ugly, no matter what anybody says.

Author:  xXVincentxX [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 11:38 am ]
Post subject: 

Algren wrote:
She is ugly. That is her natural. i do not call beauty when people have make-up on to enhance theyre appearance. When she has no make-up on, she is ugly, no matter what anybody says.


Well what kind of celebrities do you find hot? Let me evaluate them, and tell you if they are beautiful, average, or ugly. :wink:

Author:  Algren [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 11:42 am ]
Post subject: 

Pinkpanther wrote:
Algren wrote:
She is ugly. That is her natural. i do not call beauty when people have make-up on to enhance theyre appearance. When she has no make-up on, she is ugly, no matter what anybody says.


Well what kind of celebrities do you find hot? Let me evaluate them, and tell you if they are beautiful, average, or ugly. :wink:


Well, the celebrities that have natural beauty, that i like are Adriana Lima, Halle Berry, Monica Belucci, Rachel Stevens & Keira Knightley (not everyone's taste though).

Author:  Anonymous [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 12:10 pm ]
Post subject: 

Like I've posted many times before, Britney is part of a large group of young white celebrities who white people find attractive, when in fact they are quite ordinary, if not ugly.

If she worked at a Piggly Wiggly, I doubt anyone would pay her a second look at the register.

Author:  Algren [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 12:19 pm ]
Post subject: 

loyalfromlondon wrote:
Like I've posted many times before, Britney is part of a large group of young white celebrities who white people find attractive, when in fact they are quite ordinary, if not ugly.

If she worked at a Piggly Wiggly, I doubt anyone would pay her a second look at the register.


Couldn't agree with you more.

Author:  Michael. [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 12:20 pm ]
Post subject: 

these are supposed to be fakes,

i always find it humorous when people call celebrities ugly...celebrities are famous due to, in large part, their awe inspiring, memorably good looks - not for being ugly.

Britney Spears is stunning, but shes just as rough in the mornings as everyone else.

Author:  Anonymous [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 12:31 pm ]
Post subject: 

Michael wrote:
i always find it humorous when people call celebrities ugly...celebrities are famous due to, in large part, their awe inspiring, memorably good looks - not for being ugly.

Britney Spears is stunning, but shes just as rough in the mornings as everyone else.


That is completely untrue in today's world, you've been brainwashed my friend.

Take a second, look at MTV. Watch the Ashley Simpson show. She is not a celebrity because of her looks and neither is Kristen Dunst or Tara Reid or Paris Hilton or countless other people. These women aren't famous for their looks, they're famous because of their managers and press agents and the papparazzi and because the media has told you to think they are beautiful.

You need to remove them from their profession and ask yourself a simple question. If they weren't famous and you ran into them at a store, would you stand amazed in awe?

And it's not a matter of personal preference IMO. The truth is, none of these people would make it in an open modeling call. They just don't have natural beauty. Airbrush them to hell, all that's left is a CGI cartoon.

](*,)

Author:  bABA [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 12:33 pm ]
Post subject: 

Well, before those pics of her where she was completely drunk, I had the hots for Tara Reid.

Author:  Algren [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 12:37 pm ]
Post subject: 

loyalfromlondon wrote:
These women aren't famous for their looks, they're famous because of their managers and press agents and the papparazzi and because the media has told you to think they are beautiful.

You need to remove them from their profession and ask yourself a simple question. If they weren't famous and you ran into them at a store, would you stand amazed in awe?



=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

Author:  Michael. [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 12:44 pm ]
Post subject: 

loyalfromlondon wrote:
Michael wrote:
i always find it humorous when people call celebrities ugly...celebrities are famous due to, in large part, their awe inspiring, memorably good looks - not for being ugly.

Britney Spears is stunning, but shes just as rough in the mornings as everyone else.


That is completely untrue in today's world, you've been brainwashed my friend.

Take a second, look at MTV. Watch the Ashley Simpson show. She is not a celebrity because of her looks and neither is Kristen Dunst or Tara Reid or Paris Hilton or countless other people. These women aren't famous for their looks, they're famous because of their managers and press agents and the papparazzi and because the media has told you to think they are beautiful.

You need to remove them from their profession and ask yourself a simple question. If they weren't famous and you ran into them at a store, would you stand amazed in awe?

And it's not a matter of personal preference IMO. The truth is, none of these people would make it in an open modeling call. They just don't have natural beauty. Airbrush them to hell, all that's left is a CGI cartoon.

](*,)


Sorry , but who the hell are you to tell me that im brainwashed ?

Do you HONESTLY think if Paris Hilton was 21 stone and smelt like rotten egg she would be famous, just because of good management? Anyone with 5 braincells can see that good management and manipulation of media is the key to fame http://naturalflux7.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1371, but looks are the hugest part of celebrity.

Author:  Anonymous [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 12:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

Michael wrote:
loyalfromlondon wrote:
Michael wrote:
i always find it humorous when people call celebrities ugly...celebrities are famous due to, in large part, their awe inspiring, memorably good looks - not for being ugly.

Britney Spears is stunning, but shes just as rough in the mornings as everyone else.


That is completely untrue in today's world, you've been brainwashed my friend.

Take a second, look at MTV. Watch the Ashley Simpson show. She is not a celebrity because of her looks and neither is Kristen Dunst or Tara Reid or Paris Hilton or countless other people. These women aren't famous for their looks, they're famous because of their managers and press agents and the papparazzi and because the media has told you to think they are beautiful.

You need to remove them from their profession and ask yourself a simple question. If they weren't famous and you ran into them at a store, would you stand amazed in awe?

And it's not a matter of personal preference IMO. The truth is, none of these people would make it in an open modeling call. They just don't have natural beauty. Airbrush them to hell, all that's left is a CGI cartoon.

](*,)


Sorry , but who the hell are you to tell me that im brainwashed ?

Do you HONESTLY think if Paris Hilton was 21 stone and smelt like rotten egg she would be famous, just because of good management? Anyone with 5 braincells can see that good management and manipulation of media is the key to fame http://naturalflux7.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1371, but looks are the hugest part of celebrity.


Hi, I'm Loyal. Is that sufficient?

Celebrity and looks were once intertwined. But now, thanks in part to the ignorance of the masses, people who fuck on tape and have little talent are now considered beautiful celebrities simply because people are led to believe they are.

If you have the hots for ugly broads, I'm happy for you. But I won't allow digital cable and pop music to tell me who's beautiful.

Author:  Michael. [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 12:55 pm ]
Post subject: 

loyalfromlondon wrote:
Michael wrote:
loyalfromlondon wrote:
Michael wrote:
i always find it humorous when people call celebrities ugly...celebrities are famous due to, in large part, their awe inspiring, memorably good looks - not for being ugly.

Britney Spears is stunning, but shes just as rough in the mornings as everyone else.


That is completely untrue in today's world, you've been brainwashed my friend.

Take a second, look at MTV. Watch the Ashley Simpson show. She is not a celebrity because of her looks and neither is Kristen Dunst or Tara Reid or Paris Hilton or countless other people. These women aren't famous for their looks, they're famous because of their managers and press agents and the papparazzi and because the media has told you to think they are beautiful.

You need to remove them from their profession and ask yourself a simple question. If they weren't famous and you ran into them at a store, would you stand amazed in awe?

And it's not a matter of personal preference IMO. The truth is, none of these people would make it in an open modeling call. They just don't have natural beauty. Airbrush them to hell, all that's left is a CGI cartoon.

](*,)


Sorry , but who the hell are you to tell me that im brainwashed ?

Do you HONESTLY think if Paris Hilton was 21 stone and smelt like rotten egg she would be famous, just because of good management? Anyone with 5 braincells can see that good management and manipulation of media is the key to fame http://naturalflux7.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1371, but looks are the hugest part of celebrity.


Hi, I'm Loyal. Is that sufficient?

Celebrity and looks were once intertwined. But now, thanks in part to the ignorance of the masses, people who fuck on tape and have little talent are now considered beautiful celebrities simply because people are led to believe they are.

If you have the hots for ugly broads, I'm happy for you. But I won't allow digital cable and pop music tell me who's beautiful.


Why do you seem to think you stand apart from everyone else in your perceptions of beauty - like your some sort of rebel against the system of presentation? Beauty is what you want it to be, just as i think one womans totally stunning, someone else thinks shes a plain jane.

Your making out like everyone else is so far inferior intelectually than you that we cannot make descisions for ourselves, its really condescending.

Author:  zingy [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 1:03 pm ]
Post subject: 

That picture is old. Very old.

Author:  Maverikk [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 1:15 pm ]
Post subject: 

Britney is a pretty girl with a great body. Only on the internet do people act like she isn't. Only on the internet do people act like Jennifer Garner looks like a man.

Does anybody REALLY wonder why the internet stereotype is one of a dateless guy living in the basement? :razz:

Author:  Algren [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 1:25 pm ]
Post subject: 

Pretty? LAUGH!!!!!!!!!! She has a nice body, not great. Jennifer garner does look like a man, its not just people on internet.

Maverikk, you look like the guy that is in the basement etc.... taking dancing lessons to improve on his club mojo...saddo.

Author:  Maverikk [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 1:28 pm ]
Post subject: 

Algren wrote:
Pretty? LAUGH!!!!!!!!!! She has a nice body, not great. Jennifer garner does look like a man, its not just people on internet.

Maverikk, you look like the guy that is in the basement etc.... taking dancing lessons to improve on his club mojo...saddo.


Dude, you clearly are clueless about women, and about decent behavior. Your comments are always hateful toward others, so why do you think anything you say has any credibility. The insecurities are getting the better of you.

Page 1 of 3 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/