
Re: Dylan Farrow pens open letter, restates claims of abuse
Explain the opposite to me then. Tell me how Dylan is mistaken in a way that doesn't speculate or generally smear her or her story. I didn't care to elaborate too much. What would possess someone to have those specific memories? Where do those memories come from? Anytime I ever don't remember something perfectly it's easy to see where the error could have come from (exact details can slip, but it isn't completely invented). Explain to me how she could possibly be mistaken about memories she seems to have no reason to think to doubt. She stuck with it all this time, indicating it's based on actual memories, not the influence of Mia Farrow. How could the memories have been fabricated from nothing? I'm not saying it's impossible for someone to invent memories, but unless there is reason to doubt them they should generally be reliable. People have been executed for much less.
The suggestion Mia Farrow somehow compelled her to make the accusations is what's repugnant and irrational. The path of least resistance.